Just dropped a rail tank with a neutron blaster. Text book, kept something between us, lost his hardener and rushed him. Pop.

OP it is not. If they hide in the Red Line (which is their decision) I bring out the PC +damage and get them sooner or later. 9 out of 10 times they get popped. Just planning, although having a high sniper doing over watch is very helpful.

Most if not all of the QQ Kittens on these forums are just rage kitties that cannot think for themselves. Constant whining and wanting to have a Push To Win button that only works For Them! Then when someone else kills them three times in one match they never shut up about again. If that is a rail gun tank or a proto sniper it really doesn't matter.

It doesn't help that Cannot Comprehend Programming only balances by swinging abilities to the extremes.

this while it is a good idea causes another problem.

right now the redline rails arnt truly invulnerable and can still be damaged and while they oftin duck behind cover they can technically still be damaged even though its not really all that likely.

with the introduction of true invulnerability you will see people start to take advantage and poke their heads out shoot then return to the bubble before any possable return fire and have TRUE invulnerability rather then the psudo invulnerability they have now.

meaning redline rails will simply be stuck inside small bubbles and will come out for just enough time to take pot shots then return to their invulnerable palace where absolutly nothing you can do outside of a tank blockade around the bubble will stop them.

so while it is an interesting idea i dont think that replacing psudo-invulnerability with ACTUAL invulnerability is a good idea as it opens up the situation for even more blantant and dangerous abuses then we currently have to deal with. especially concidering it alows a rail tank to remain completly invulnerable from dropships while still giving the railtank every advantage in the fight it currently has.

your solution doesnt actually solve the problem it intends to solve and instead keeps the problem the exact same while potentially creating new problems along the way.

depending on how its done it could also prevent you from being able to orbital redline rails, removing one of our only real ways to get rid of redline rail infestations.

TL:DR the cure is worse then the disease

I agree this idea does have its faults and its not the instant cure that we all want, it is just an idea, but I think you have missed the point of what I was trying to express in this video.... I loath nerfs and I don't want the rail tank to be nerfed im trying to provide a different solution to nerfing and this idea is one such solution. There are many others and im sure a combination of these ideas will see the change in tactics which has a knock on effect to the loadout of the tank and therefore lowers the DPS, no need for nerfs.... wipe out the source of the disease and there wont be a need for a cure

This is pure opinion, just a "nu-uh!". It doesn't present new facts, it doesn't analyze and dismantle previous arguments, and it doesn't present any new reasoning of its own. It's opinion with no backup.

This is supposed to be a refutation of Judge's presentation?

It would be nice to see the redline go; so I can freely fly off into the distance in my derpship and go explore those massive Loldari and Faillente cities we often see in the far distance!

I'll just add to this by saying HMG, heavy machine gun, a name by which you would be forgiven for thinking similarly to your above post on the name HAV, but unfortunately needs massive eHP and a nice friendly logi to be effective in just spitting distance So many naming issues with gear in this game, but fortunately(I hope) CCP don't balance by name.

I'll check the video later Bamm, and I'm expecting/hoping there to have been loads of crayons used. Or really bad Paintbrushing And the only pie chart had better be made out of a good pork pie.