DUST Search - Will EvE mattering change things?

Dr PepperPoP wrote:

Just to make sure you understand your own logic - how are you any different then what you claim of me? Besides - you know - the difference of one of us usually being invited to the winning side, rather then having to seek out the winning side themselves. Roll

Dr PepperPoP wrote:

Funny part is - calling me a bandwagoner. I've never sought out the corp I've been in accept ZTCD. Imps sought me out when I left ZTCD - and when TP realized I would fight for highest bidder they contacted me. If anything - my bandwagoning has shown that the best around consistently are willing to fight with me.

Now what about you? Nothing. You say I'm all talk on the forums - yet that's exactly where you are, not me. I've solved my grudges and had my matches against those I wanted - now I can sit back and just troll the forums with millions in my pocket, with millions more to come.

I'll be the first to admit after all my bragging I'm not the best heavy - Preston is, but how that is relevant to the discussion of how EvE and Dust will link and how it effects corps hiding behind EvE Alliance Tags - is beyond me. Or how anything you say is relevant - or how you yourself are.

Now go back to hiding behind your EvE guys while your dust side gets face stomped by 'band wagoners' Lol


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1125	Posted - 2014.02.27 21:52:00 - [1] - Quote These posts made by barely decent players who hopped on a bandwagon and get carried by better players is just funny. Keep up the good troll-lol filled posts... boys. /sips bacon flavored soda
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1125	Posted - 2014.02.27 22:44:00 - [2] - Quote Dr PepperPoP wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: These posts made by barely decent players who hopped on a bandwagon and get carried by better players is just funny. Keep up the good troll-lol filled posts... boys. /sips bacon flavored soda Does this mean you agree or disagree? Not that the opinion of someone who can't win a game without ringers matter - but hey, let's hear it anyways. Does it really matter? Lol I find The second part ironic since you are part of a ringer mercenary corp, one of their loudest . So heres another lol for you. (at you, not with you)
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1125	Posted - 2014.02.28 00:09:00 - [3] - Quote Forge space!!
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1126	Posted - 2014.02.28 04:27:00 - [4] - Quote Dr PepperPoP wrote: You shouldn't find anything ironic about it - Being in a merc group simply gives me first hand view on which corps can't win on there own. And if it didn't matter why would I make a thread on the topic, and why would you reply to said thread? If you're trying to troll you're going to find yourself out-classed here. I guess class is in session you egomaniacle scrub, take out your pen and paper, try to keep up. So here is how irony works. You thumb your nose up at me for being in ML who apparently cant win a match on their own without ringers, according to you. Yet you havent proven to be anythng but a big mouth, semi-decent player who follows the best around from corp to corp trying to be relevant... So please tell me again why anyone should give anythng you say any more merit than, oh i dunno, how about rampage. You bloated fool. I came to troll this self righteous thread because it deserved trolling, Just because you make a thread about something doesnt mean it matters. Actually, since you are nothing more than a troll, always have been always will be, i can rest assured that pretty much everything you say is utter trash... Good for lols and nothing more. lol outclassed in a trolling match. Seek help friend.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1126	Posted - 2014.02.28 04:30:00 - [5] - Quote Oh and anime sucks... Nerd.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1128	Posted - 2014.02.28 14:37:00 - [6] - Quote Dr PepperPoP wrote: Just to make sure you understand your own logic - how are you any different then what you claim of me? Besides - you know - the difference of one of us usually being invited to the winning side, rather then having to seek out the winning side themselves. Not sure I understand.. I don't go around beating my chest on these forums like I am something special (you do) and making constant posts putting down other corporations (you do). That's the difference, I know my role, I know my place, and its in the middle somewhere. I don't piggy back the accomplishments of better players and come off all high and mighty like I did something special (you do). I may be a **, but I'm not a douche (like you). Dr PepperPoP wrote: Funny part is - calling me a bandwagoner. I've never sought out the corp I've been in accept ZTCD. Imps sought me out when I left ZTCD - and when TP realized I would fight for highest bidder they contacted me. If anything - my bandwagoning has shown that the best around consistently are willing to fight with me. Now what about you? Nothing. You say I'm all talk on the forums - yet that's exactly where you are, not me. I've solved my grudges and had my matches against those I wanted - now I can sit back and just troll the forums with millions in my pocket, with millions more to come. I'll be the first to admit after all my bragging I'm not the best heavy - Preston is, but how that is relevant to the discussion of how EvE and Dust will link and how it effects corps hiding behind EvE Alliance Tags - is beyond me. Or how anything you say is relevant - or how you yourself are. Now go back to hiding behind your EvE guys while your dust side gets face stomped by 'band wagoners' Lol I don't see much to respond to here so I will leave you with this And just remember, not everyone is out there to bandwagon join the already established "best of the best". That has worked for you I guess and your "millions" lol (you don't really think people like me ever need to worry about isk in this game, do you?).. some of us enjoy the struggle of rising from the bottom, building and growing a corp, a team with likeminded individuals, just as much as we enjoy shooting red dots. You can keep on beating your chest tho.. and I may have to come and ** in your cheerios again. ______________ On topic, like the previous poster said... its a wait and see scenario. A lot of things can and will probably change regarding PC soonTM. Obviously the current iteration has proven to be a bit broken.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1135	Posted - 2014.02.28 15:48:00 - [7] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: In the near term they could change the timers up to allow for battles to spin up within an hour of an attack and this would open up PC quite a bit. Or basically just ensure everyone had a job to be online every day. o.O And an hour warning is barely enough time to spin up a team for the match. I doubt many of the larger corps would have a problem throwing a team together. It could promote more folks getting invited into PC, but yeah I could see a potential problem for the smaller corps who have pooled together some of the better players this game has to offer and who currently have a strangle hold on PC as a whole. It would change the dynamics quite a bit... whats wrong with change?
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1136	Posted - 2014.02.28 16:15:00 - [8] - Quote Which would make it a lot more like "war" instead of "planned parenthood". I cant see much merit in your argument that corps wouldn't be able to put together suitable teams because both sides would be hindered by that dilemma. Forced to re-evaluate their PC approach, corp size, alliance, eve support.. instead of shipping 200 million isk to better players to save their land.. tomorrow. Individual players would need to be more concerned with filling multiple roles, which will become easier the older the game gets and the more skill points people acquire. I am a semi-casual player, but I have played for over a year now... and even I can put together two proto suits to fill a few different roles. Just a thought, not right or wrong. Thanks for sharing your opinion.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1137	Posted - 2014.02.28 17:18:00 - [9] - Quote Ok I see where you are coming from. If districts are open to attack at any time during a 24 hour day, this would be true. But this poses the next question, why is that a bad thing? Normally in a war scenario, the attackers do and should have the upper hand regarding when a fight takes place.. since, ya know, they choose when to attack. Edit: Perhaps having more options for battle.. for example: instant surprise attack... 120 clones. 1 hour prep time regular attack... 180 clones. 3 hour prep time All out war... 300 clones. 24 hour prep time (this type of battle could last quite a bit longer than a typical PC battle today, maybe 30-45 minutes of straight fighting) Defenders benefit from being entrenched, ie. having more clones, knowing their land better than their opponents.. perhaps defenders would have the ability to pick map, infrastructure, or choose some sort of other bonus to be applied during battle.. say a small incrase to damage dealt to enemy MCC, or 5% increase to HP, or some other benefit to the defending troops.. call it a defensive buff. These decisions could be made during the 1 hour window from when the attacker initiates the attack, and the battle begins. This would promote utilizing friendly ties within game a lot more now, and on the spot. Alliances would be more useful, relationships would be built or shattered, meta, spying, awoxing, etc etc. Assuming this would be the case, and a defending corporation cannot put together a defensive force and they lose their district. The next day they attack back, and assuming the attacker always have the upper hand now the shoe is on the other foot. What does this promote? More fights, more isk being spent, more activity, and perhaps more fun. Now regarding your part about increasing the barrier for new players... not sure I understand how that would work. If corporations are inundated with defenses and attacks, logically they would need more players to field for these battles. hence, invite players whom you would not normally invite.. because they either are too new, too inexperienced, have bad breath, whatever. My position is to figure out a way where the top 100 players in the game no longer have the ability to monopolize the entire board due to restrictive, planned parenthood battles, where it simply takes a small amount of incentive (isk) to convince these top players to fight everyones battles for them. If you like having that as an option, then we do not hold the same views for what PC should, or could be.