|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
793
   |
Posted - 2014.02.27 09:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm just going to say, good stuff to the players who roll with the punches 
Yes vehicles are in a bad way, but AV is not as ineffective as people are claiming
If more players actually performed an AV role it's a non-issue (until tanks 5,6,7 show up)
How many guys have posted QQ on forum over vehicles....
Rather than get on with it, adapt or die..... Co-ordinate!!!!! 
I'm sick of seeing, ''Yeah just got my IshukoneFG, now I can kill Vehicles''
My thoughts are, ''You could do it with basic if your had the wits to time attacks''
It takes co-ordination to get AV kills, not Proto gear
- How many times are tanks covered in SL/FG rounds while hardeners active??
- How many times does the SL scare off the HAV before the FG comes into effect??
- How many scouts die because you couldn't resist firing on HAV while they tried to set RE??
The issue is with Dust players and Vehicle limits...
Some of the most skilled HAVs and ADS's have just became trolls since 1.7
As they know if their squad spams vehicles, they win matches....
I've been here long enough to not expect much from Dust players
The majority of the playerbase is leaning on this crutch, and will until CCP fix it
Again, I waste my breathe on this... 
Vehicles are not OP (speaking from AV role)
The issue is too many vehicles on maps...
Giving teams the ability to have 7 of one vehicle is madness
By introducing limits, these vehicles will be required to perform well
Not just trolling and padding their K/D .... sigh How do I reeeach theese Kiiiids - Eric Cartmenez
Rant over until the next QQ about I can't kill tanks happens....
If you wan't AV, hire a guy running AV since 1.7 
Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks
And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
793
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 09:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Don't get me wrong.... I hate the HAV epidemic as much as anyone
But since 1,7 I have had to main an AV role as too many players think
''That's too hard, My precious K/D might get hurt''
CCP if one of your Trolls *cough* I mean staff browse over this
Then please ask yourself why you have let this continue so long.....
When the work you have done on vehicles is very good
The issues are stacked Hardeners, and no vehicle restrictions
Proof that CCP Wolfman is Duna2002
Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks
And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
797
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 11:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ill jump online in 5 minutes
And if I revolutionkiller is online, you can see the squad that's been hunting Duna 
sidenote: Duna if you happen to see this, the offer still stands
- 50 million and we will stop actively targeting your tanks ... o7
Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks
And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
799
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 18:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
I had a thought before on keeping the ability to stack hardeners,
while reducing their effectiveness when multiple are equiped
So rather than 40% resistance for each, they would get maybe 25/30% for each...
This would add a benefit to not stacking, and a minor penalty to stacking
Plasma Cannons works, any less drawbacks
And I would have an Atomic Bomber on my shoulder
|
|
|
| |
|