DUST Search - 1.8 SP Refund

Scheherazade VII wrote:

Rinzler XVIII wrote:

Scheherazade VII wrote:

Rinzler XVIII wrote:

Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads

(Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig)

Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking

CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ?

say goodbye to your account just through making this thread.

be careful.

It seems to be the only way to get any kind of DEV response these days

Honestly If they'd actually give the community some feedback in the Respec thread then I wouldn't have felt the need to create this thread

Fact is they made the thread so they didn't have to deal with the issue and we simply can't allow them to sidestep an issue as important as this

You'd think they'd have realised how pasionate the community was about the issue seeing as they had to create a thread themselves for it due to the sheer number of player based threads on the subject

Logibro or whichever DEV locks this thread (I know how you work) go look at the respec discussion thread you created and ACTUALLY TALK TO THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINION

EDIT: if u read what i put (as this post) ignore it i just realised it was really stupid

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rinzler XVIII Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 52	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:39:00 - [1] - Quote Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ?
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance 1956	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:40:00 - [2] - Quote to be fair the devs aren't commenting on anything at all. not sure why respecs would be the exception lol. seriously i'm pretty sure logibro is the last person working on dust and he's just their to turn the lights off on the way out.
Scheherazade VII 266	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:56:00 - [3] - Quote Rinzler XVIII wrote: Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ? say goodbye to your account just through making this thread. be careful.
Rinzler XVIII Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 56	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:05:00 - [4] - Quote Scheherazade VII wrote: Rinzler XVIII wrote: Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ? say goodbye to your account just through making this thread. be careful. It seems to be the only way to get any kind of DEV response these days Honestly If they'd actually give the community some feedback in the Respec thread then I wouldn't have felt the need to create this thread Fact is they made the thread so they didn't have to deal with the issue and we simply can't allow them to sidestep an issue as important as this You'd think they'd have realised how pasionate the community was about the issue seeing as they had to create a thread themselves for it due to the sheer number of player based threads on the subject Logibro or whichever DEV locks this thread (I know how you work) go look at the respec discussion thread you created and ACTUALLY TALK TO THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINION If not then I implore all players in support of an infantry respec to create a thread in general discussion until such time the DEVS engage with us in the thread they created
Scheherazade VII 266	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:07:00 - [5] - Quote Rinzler XVIII wrote: Scheherazade VII wrote: Rinzler XVIII wrote: Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ? say goodbye to your account just through making this thread. be careful. It seems to be the only way to get any kind of DEV response these days Honestly If they'd actually give the community some feedback in the Respec thread then I wouldn't have felt the need to create this thread Fact is they made the thread so they didn't have to deal with the issue and we simply can't allow them to sidestep an issue as important as this You'd think they'd have realised how pasionate the community was about the issue seeing as they had to create a thread themselves for it due to the sheer number of player based threads on the subject Logibro or whichever DEV locks this thread (I know how you work) go look at the respec discussion thread you created and ACTUALLY TALK TO THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINION i think they created one thread for all respec discussion, i created a respec thread and got banned when there were 16 on the front page. well they have responded, they just can't say yes or no, they responded with "maybe"...so i guess that's a response? its' still being debated.
Hynox Xitio Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 130	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:11:00 - [6] - Quote LOGIBRO WE HAVE MORE FOOD FOR YOU, COME OUT NOW. Unleash the Fogwoggler
Rinzler XVIII Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 58	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:13:00 - [7] - Quote Scheherazade VII wrote: Rinzler XVIII wrote: Scheherazade VII wrote: Rinzler XVIII wrote: Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ? say goodbye to your account just through making this thread. be careful. It seems to be the only way to get any kind of DEV response these days Honestly If they'd actually give the community some feedback in the Respec thread then I wouldn't have felt the need to create this thread Fact is they made the thread so they didn't have to deal with the issue and we simply can't allow them to sidestep an issue as important as this You'd think they'd have realised how pasionate the community was about the issue seeing as they had to create a thread themselves for it due to the sheer number of player based threads on the subject Logibro or whichever DEV locks this thread (I know how you work) go look at the respec discussion thread you created and ACTUALLY TALK TO THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINION EDIT: if u read what i put (as this post) ignore it i just realised it was really stupid I'm taking 1 for the team here All I want is for them to discuss it with the players ... not a maybe .. if there are reasons why they don't want to give us one .. why don't they share them with us ? I'd rather not get one and know why than not get one and have no idea why we haven't been given one
Rinzler XVIII Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 58	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:17:00 - [8] - Quote calisk galern wrote: to be fair the devs aren't commenting on anything at all. not sure why respecs would be the exception lol. seriously i'm pretty sure logibro is the last person working on dust and he's just their to turn the lights off on the way out. That is exactly what all the problems in this game stem from Not enough communication between CCP and the players .. there isn't even enough communication between CPMs and the players either .. hence the 1.7 fail with the CPMs help
Cotsy8 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 12	Posted - 2014.02.26 01:47:00 - [9] - Quote Relax, Everyone will get some sort of limited refund/re-spec etc.. When the new 2.0 skill tree is inserted into the game. Whether that will be 1.8 or 1.9. Too many new skills, old ones changing, values and SP costs changing. So patience. Elite player won't want a re-spec to keep their gap wider, CCP has all but said they will have a limited re-spec on weapons and one can assume that extends to suits cuz the changes are very sudden and drastic. So stop posting treads about it, either they feel the update is game changing enough or they don't. Regardless of community opinion CCP will do what they want and will deal with the backlash afterwards.
Patrick57 5480	Posted - 2014.02.26 01:54:00 - [10] - Quote Infantry respec, yes. I go negative in PC, yay
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 3275	Posted - 2014.02.26 03:58:00 - [11] - Quote I'd be happy with a dropsuit command respec. Maybe a weaponry one too. Modules & equipment would be harder to argue for though. Those are things you would have picked to compliment the role you chose. No.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 11597	Posted - 2014.02.26 04:03:00 - [12] - Quote I want out dis fat suit Videos / Fiction Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
Disturbingly Bored The Strontium Asylum 1758	Posted - 2014.02.26 04:08:00 - [13] - Quote Just based on what CCP did for vehicles, I'm almost certain we'll be getting some kind of respec/refund/wtfever in 1.8. CCP is probably tight-lipped because no one has decided how far they'll go. Refund SP in heavy and scout suits only? Refund it in Dropsuit Command only? Refund everything but weapon SP? Or just do a full-on respec just to squelch all the inevitable whining? If they even acknowledge that, at a bare minumum, we'll be getting some SP back, they'll be inundated with so many threads and questions that the current number of threads would look like a slow day in General Discussions. So I imagine they're under strict orders to STFU. That's just how I see it. I imagine info isn't more than a week or two off. In the mean time, I'm happily mulching away with my HMG. I used to own the FAT GAT until this --> [ASCII Art removed - *draconian forum overlord* CCP Logibro]
Tweaksz Crimson Saints 17	Posted - 2014.02.26 04:08:00 - [14] - Quote Moar wood for da fire! Raptor Squad
Poonmunch Sanguis Defense Syndicate 805	Posted - 2014.02.26 04:12:00 - [15] - Quote Scheherazade VII wrote: Rinzler XVIII wrote: Due to there being no DEV response at all in the respec discussion thread I have decided to not take any notice of it and have decided to instead create SP Refund discussion threads (Loophole CCP LogiBro SP Refund and Respec are 2 different things so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig) Although I don't think that any discussion is required, a full infantry respec in 1.8 should be an absolute certainty so basically I'm just asking CCP 1.8 Infantry SP Refund Yes or No ? say goodbye to your account just through making this thread. be careful. I disagree. Anything constructive should be fine. They've let plenty of inflammatory posters keep their accounts (although they do lock inappropriate threads). Munch Munch for CPM 1 Campaign Headquarters
THEAMAZING POTHEAD Nyain San Renegade Alliance 996	Posted - 2014.02.26 04:13:00 - [16] - Quote CCP said they still haven't decided yet. Derp, pay more attention-click search-dev posts, scroll through & keep tabs on them. GEEEEEEETTT SOOOOOOMMMMMEEEE!!!!!!

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page