|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
494
   |
Posted - 2014.02.25 02:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
The corporate raiders seem to be a corp stuck in a canyon. They are stuck between success and failure. Due to one of their directors they are know by big name corps, but they are not strong. TRC appears to be a perfect combination of a laid back corp while still trying to be competitive.This prevents them from being successful. The alliance their may be holding them back due to the fake power it has. Supported by the Goon-swarm Federation yet true dust/eve alliance can easily crush what they may want to achieve. The corp does not appear to have large amounts of drama due to the radio silence that they appear to have on the forums.
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
496
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 01:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nomed Deeps wrote:Quote:The corporate raiders seem to be a corp stuck in a canyon. They are stuck between success and failure. Due to one of their directors they are know by big name corps, but they are not strong. PC is currently in a state where it is pointless to take PC seriously (which had already been stated). So to try and judge which corp is strong or weak off of current PC performance is also pointless. BTW, to assume a corp's in game activity by their activity here on the forum is pretty ridiculous. 95% of posts here are full of QQ, e-peen stroking, or plain gibberish where some rather just skim than actually post. I apologize for temporarily hijacking the post but wanted to reply to a couple of past comments.
Why are you attacking me? The Op asked for opinion of TRC. I gave it.
I didn't mention anything about activity. Radio silence is a term i used when i was in pradox simply saying don't talk on the forums. A post only gives more fuel for the engine of a troll. I never talked about activity. If you think i did talked about activity please post where next time.
When arguing success in New Eden it is no different then arguing Morality it is all subjective.
This doesn't involve the TRC, but performance in pc does show success and success shows strength. When it comes to PC the alliance you are in is a piece a crap. Let me remind you about last summer. Top-Men bought a planet from some other faction. shortly after that 187,Dark Legion, and i believe STB had the planet in a matter of days. ( This wasn't a coalition ). My version of success is making money no matter what it takes. When Top-Men had to keep their key to success they did not.
Soraya Xel wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote:Supported by the Goon-swarm Federation yet true dust/eve alliance can easily crush what they may want to achieve. Nomed picked apart most of your post, he missed this one. "True DUST/EVE alliance" ... lololololol. Nice try. :)
Do you have Intel on all of the alliances that are strong in dust, probably not with that statement. EVE side of every major alliance is growing rapidly. You wanna know why the war between PFV and SQDRN, Because OH/VC was scared of a SQDRN blitz on PFV. OH/VC also believed that by the time pc 2.0 came out SQDRN eve side could prevent any success of PFV in PC. So PFV decided to attack to eliminate SQDRN from PC. I'm not being rude when i say this but have you seen what has been happening with the alliances that own districts?
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
21yrOld Knight
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
503
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 00:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nomed Deeps wrote:
What honestly happened is we were repeatedly attacked from all sides from multiple corps (the only other I can remember off the top of my head right now is KEQ). We actually had our districts for a few weeks. Doesn't really matter though as the result ended up the same. And truthfully after undergoing so many attacks repeatedly day after day, we were ready to exit PC at that time. Top Men has always tried to rely on ourselves rather than buddying up with other alliances and continue to fight our own battles. With doing so, we normally own PC districts for a very short time as we are continually attacked until they are finally taken. Still, we persevere trying to learn from our losses. We also hadn't taken part in district locking which is mainly responsible for a lot of smaller corps' current "success".
In any case, the specific instance above has nothing to do with TCR as they were not in the alliance at the time.
21yrOld Knight wrote: When arguing success in New Eden it is no different then arguing Morality it is all subjective.
This doesn't involve the TRC, but performance in pc does show success and success shows strength. When it comes to PC the alliance you are in is a piece a crap. Let me remind you about last summer. Top-Men bought a planet from some other faction. shortly after that 187,Dark Legion, and i believe STB had the planet in a matter of days. ( This wasn't a coalition ). My version of success is making money no matter what it takes. When Top-Men had to keep their key to success they did not.
^
There is the original post. I clearly state that TRC was not involved with my example. I was giving my definition of success. I was explaining why i saw that if a corp had success in pc then they were successful. I was giving an example why i personally think Top Men is not successful. I think TRC is not succesful because they tried in pc, put isk into a fight and failed. Before that statement i stated that the definition of success is very subjective.
Attack as in attack my argument. Why did you have to reply at all. The statements i made were asked from the op about his corp I gave my summary. I am confused why you made a comment about my post.
Ralph Ellison was Right. Yes Suh.
|
|
|
| |
|