| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
990
   |
Posted - 2014.02.23 19:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Give it a cone of fire, make it fire faster, and make it do less damage. Maybe even for the smalls.
Seeing as CCP, in their infinite wisdom made rails better for anti-tank work, even at point blank range with higher DPS, alpha, and range. May as well just make the party favor blaster tanks good for something.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Glitch116
On The Brink
CRONOS.
82
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 20:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
no
large turrets are anti tank that is their main job anything other then this is secondary
as for blasters being good against infantry that needs some work but not this
I AM THE KING OF THE BLASTER!!!
deal with it
|
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
993
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 21:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Glitch116 wrote:no
large turrets are anti tank that is their main job anything other then this is secondary
as for blasters being good against infantry that needs some work but not this
Really? then why does it have less DPS than the rail turrets, less alpha than the missiles, and less range than both?
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Regis Blackbird
DUST University
Ivy League
101
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 21:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Make the large blaster suck against infantry (let's say too inaccurate to hit a small moving target), and improve the small blaster turrets instead. This way the tanks will be forced to equip small turrets if they want have good anti infantry capabilities.
This also removes the (since 1.7) complain that it takes coordinated effort to kill a tank piloted with only one person.
I.e remove all extra seats (small turrets), and be a sitting duck for infantry.
Or equip small turrets and be a much harder target, but will thigh up more people to do the tanking. |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
993
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 21:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Regis Blackbird wrote:Make the large blaster suck against infantry (let's say too inaccurate to hit a small moving target), and improve the small blaster turrets instead. This way the tanks will be forced to equip small turrets if they want have good anti infantry capabilities.
This also removes the (since 1.7) complain that it takes coordinated effort to kill a tank piloted with only one person.
I.e remove all extra seats (small turrets), and be a sitting duck for infantry.
Or equip small turrets and be a much harder target, but will thigh up more people to do the tanking.
So, cripple the only thing it does well, while adding nothing to the gun...
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Glitch116
On The Brink
CRONOS.
86
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 23:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Glitch116 wrote:no
large turrets are anti tank that is their main job anything other then this is secondary
as for blasters being good against infantry that needs some work but not this Really? then why does it have less DPS than the rail turrets, less alpha than the missiles, and less range than both?
because rails are op right now and missiles are made for alpha
the blaster is meant to be a high DPS high tracking turret
where as rails are meant to be high alpha low tracking turrets
blaster work nicely up close and personal against other tanks they are just over shadowed in CQC by the broken rails
I AM THE KING OF THE BLASTER!!!
deal with it
|
Meeko Fent
Kirkinen Risk Control
Caldari State
1790
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 23:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Glitch116 wrote:no
large turrets are anti tank that is their main job anything other then this is secondary
as for blasters being good against infantry that needs some work but not this Really? then why does it have less DPS than the rail turrets, less alpha than the missiles, and less range than both?
Yeah.
That's what everybody knows Blasters are for. Anti-Infantry.
They suck for anything else.
Looking for a Interesting Character Name?
Why Not Zoidberg?
|
Glitch116
On The Brink
CRONOS.
86
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 00:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
i use blasters and wreck tanks blaster work great for AV if you know what you are doing they can out perform both rails and missiles in the right hands
I AM THE KING OF THE BLASTER!!!
deal with it
|
ladwar
Death by Disassociation
Legacy Rising
1994
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 02:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
ah so this is still going about... so happy i don't worry about stuff like this.
Level 2 Forum Warrior, bitter vet.
I shall smite Thy Trolls with numbers and truth
doing reviews in free time, want 1?
|
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
996
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 02:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Glitch116 wrote:i use blasters and wreck tanks blaster work great for AV if you know what you are doing they can out perform both rails and missiles in the right hands
Right. believe your beating an idiot who was in way over their head outweighs the math and actual results of any realistic testing.
A blaster "can outperform in the right hands". a rail can outperform in just about every situation, in any hands.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |