|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
691
   |
Posted - 2014.02.22 22:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Wolfman previously stated they will be addressing the PLC soon....
I for one love the mechanic of the regular variant and
will be disappointed if drastic changes are introduced
As I know from experience, a buff will create a FoTm atomic bomb
And I also know once you adapt to it's use it can be effective, I've used since release 
It excels at the role of anti-infantry suppresion, and can deter Vehicles
CCP I know you do your best to avoid my opinion, but like all crazy people claim..
- This time I know what I'm talking about - 
If CCP introduce variants then the role of PLC can extend to being specialist AV
- Breach , slow but hits really hard (2200DMG)
- Assault, usually these are faster versions but I would make exception with PLC
And have the Assault deal less direct hit DMG but causes lasting DMG to targets
so basically the burning effect we have seen posted on forum
This way the Assault would stop vehicles from repping between shots
And would make the PLC perform perfectly in AV...
We get the regular (Infantry SUPPRESION) Not infantry slaying...
It works perfectly in holding any infantry back from desired target
The Breach, basically an Orbital Cannon
The Assault, faster fire with the bonus of delaying vehicle reps
I have also though a lot since 1.7 on if it should ignore hardeners on vehicles
And that is something that could be looked at, it is really tough to get CQC with HAV
Just to have to endure 60 seconds of hardener until it's worth firing...
By which time the HAV has repped, and cycled through hardeners so there is no hope
Anyone seeking a slayer weapon should stick to DMG Modded AR variants
Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
693
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 22:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:There will be no Assault Plasma Cannon, because the Gallante weapons are inherently Assault. This is the reason there is not an Assault Shotgun or Assault Assault Rifle.
Thanks for info, but I did say it wouldn't function like the usual Assault variants
So as it is not intended as 'Assault' I will change the name in OP
Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
695
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 22:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:an OB plasma cannon
fire's ob rounds
Technically the std PLC hits higher DMG per-shot than an OB per-pulse
Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
696
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 10:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Wolfe, a source for your input would be nice
We have all heard these 'ideas' but nothing has been confirmed by CCP
Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
696
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 11:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Indeed, and thank CCP for that or we would see it spammed from every rooftop
Plasma Cannon will have its chance if AR/HAV 514 is ever fixed
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
887
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 13:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bump!
EA can reset/ban exploiters/boosters
What can CCP do about them???
|
|
|
| |
|