|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
1766
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 18:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Before: AV is invulnerable to Tanks (rendering glitch)
Now: Tanks are invulnerable to infantry and most AV overnerfed SL and fixed bugs
Before: Blah Blah ISK 200k HAV > 1x 200k suit when we could see them
Now: 200k tank >>>>>>>>>>>> 200k suits assuming you're a scrub and don't have/know how to use effective AV tactics. Or you expect your Duvolle to kill my HAV
Before:
1 AV'er killing 3 tanks is OP *1 AVer killing 1 HAV inside 10s from outside render distance is OP
Now: 1 tank killing squads not OP because they've never done this before? Did you ever even play against a decent tanker?
Before: AV should be able to SOLO! Make tanks require teamwork.
Now: Tanks should be able to SOLO!! Make AV require teamwork.
Then: 400M range locks down entire field
Now: lol railguns and killing infantry at 200 Ms with blasters....
400m =/= 200m. This is called basic mathematics.
Yeah, you guys never get to talk about underpowered again... ever. You have no credibility left. two months =/= eight months. Although apparently Crimson Cerberes = Spkr4theDead.
I'm terribly sorry, but your credibility is approximately as poor as ours, if not worse.
lol@ invisible 400m fire-and-forget 2k DPS weapon 'requires skill'.
Yeah, nope.
Do you know how often people would dance in the middle of the street trying to kill me? With both forges and swarms? Had a rather low success rate, which makes sense considering my experience surviving BS AV, but the very fact that it happened?
Clearly it was somewhat successful.
Do you honestly think it makes sense for me to be running an anti-infantry turret and that you are (hypptheticaly) capable of soloing me from the middle of the road in front of me?
You might enjoy bitching and moaning (let's face it, you clearly do) but I can find you no more than two tankers that are satisfied with this current situation.
I bet you can guess who they are
Please, find me some AVers who stuck up for pilots at ANY point in the last eight months.
Then come talk to me about fucking 'hypocrisy'.
I'm done.
Enjoy your circle jerk.
Forge on for great justice!
Defend the meek! Destroy the weak!
Q-sync breaches into the rectum of everyone else!
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
1768
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 18:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Oh only about 90% of the forums agreed that tanks and especially dropships were underpowered. It was everyone on the forums who thought that they needed a boost. This is no secret, look at the damn forums. This was a large cross section from all types of gameplay.
Bullshit. You weren't paying attention, apparently. We'd point out how fucking BS it was that we'd get slaughtered inside ten seconds from outside rendering by assholes camping towers and the community would tell us 'HTFU'.
We'd complain about getting 3shotted by Lai Dai grenades. We'd be told to HTFU.
Bull-fucking-shit.
Quote:Now? People still don't have a problem with LAVs or Dropships
Right, whatever. Saw some QQ about road killing last week.
ADSes? People have been bitching about those too. Learn to read.
Quote:ONLY TANKS. Now LAV drivers, Dropships pilots, infantry, and AV all have a problem with tanks. Who doesn't have a problem with tanks? The tanker community.
Right whatever. No such thing as a LAV driver - they're tankers on a break. DS pilots have a problem with the redline. Infantry want AV in their pockets - always have, even when it was blatantly OP - I've been seeing calls for SL to be sidearms for months.
AV - well you guys are just whiners. Can't hack it when everything's going your way, and now you have to invest SP and WORK. But no, you can't do that. You're amazing at this game - if you can't solo a HAV clearly it's OP. You shouldn't have to work or think - who called this the 'thinking man's shooter', anyway?
Quote:Sure you can say that there are only two tankers who have a problem with it, but that would be less the genuine wouldn't it?
Nope.
I ran my tank once today out of about twenty matches. I ran my forge in about twelve of those. Please make valid assertions next time.
Forge on for great justice!
Defend the meek! Destroy the weak!
Q-sync breaches into the rectum of everyone else!
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
1768
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 19:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:its funny because tankers can now sit on a tower with a railgun, and are about 5x as effective as any infantry unit pre 1.7. Ask buzzzzzzzz kiilllllllllllllllllllll for details Forge gunners doing it is fine, but tankers doing it is OP. Double standards all the way. Oh right totally the same.... well except with double the range forge guns ever had, double the DPS, with a great zoom, while being invulnerable to infantry, faster than infantry, and stronger than infantry.... but yeah totally the same. Yeah, because forge gunners and HAV's totally have the same elevation in aiming... Oh wait a minute! Joke post? Joke post. You can't honestly think that is even remotely comparible right? So HAVs have a 50 degree elevation restriction, and that totally evens out the invulnerability to 90% of the game, oh and the incredible speed, oh and the cheapness, and being non-sp intensive, and double the range, and double the DPS, and easily travesing terrain that would make a heavy cry, and .... Well I think I made my point.
Do you know how to get useful elevation from the top of a tower?
Lean over its edge.
Know what happens when you do that? You wouldn't, because unlike tankers, you've never really tried the other side, have you?
You risk falling off. You make yourself a huge target. Only an idiot rails from the top of a tower.
I bet I'll see you up there sometime soon.
P.S. How much terrain is there on top of a tower again?
At least be consistent in your arguments.
Forge on for great justice!
Defend the meek! Destroy the weak!
Q-sync breaches into the rectum of everyone else!
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
1813
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 14:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:this is still going O.o
Yeah, I thought it'd either be dead or locked by now.
Guess not?
Wonder if those guys ended up having their showdown?
Forge on for great justice!
Defend the meek! Destroy the weak!
Q-sync breaches into the rectum of everyone else!
|
|
|
|