|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
251
   |
Posted - 2014.02.21 18:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:really? you're actually going to try to deny his points with anecdotal evidence of how you are the magical jesus of blowing up tanks?
all right then....
may I suggest video evidence of your elite tank fighting skills, I personally would enjoy watching the batman of tank fighting deal with tanks like they were your whipping boys.
I would like to add a rail gun tank is nothing like a forge gunner, the forge gunner is vulnerable, slow, has near to no anti-infantry capabilities, and if he's a good forge gunner probably costs more then the tank.
Erm, what "evidence" do you complainers present to the contrary if not anecdotal?  |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
251
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 18:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:calisk galern wrote:really? you're actually going to try to deny his points with anecdotal evidence of how you are the magical jesus of blowing up tanks?
all right then....
may I suggest video evidence of your elite tank fighting skills, I personally would enjoy watching the batman of tank fighting deal with tanks like they were your whipping boys.
I would like to add a rail gun tank is nothing like a forge gunner, the forge gunner is vulnerable, slow, has near to no anti-infantry capabilities, and if he's a good forge gunner probably costs more then the tank. Erm, what "evidence" do you complainers present to the contrary if not anecdotal? hmmm....how about every single video on your tube involving the numerous 6 tank steam rolls? how about the hundreds of players that feel like quitting after being rolled game after game after game because they don't have 20+ million sp characters with anti tank fits. math, has been presented, videos presented, numerous steam rolls, ambush is practically unplayable because of them, what more do you want -.-. I can find the threads, and the videos, but seriously why do I need to, it's been discussed, av is likely getting buffed, i'm just shocked someone wants to still use the "I can pop a tank with my 35 million sp character, so tanks must be balanced" defence.
Still just anecdotal evidence.
Here's some more anecdotal evidence: I got popped by a forge gunner yesterday.
If you feel like calling me a "bad tanker" because of it, then i suggest you put your money where your mouth is.
What I thought was funny here is how you whiners seem to consider your "evidence" to be "scientific" (or something) +ñven you are all just as biased and base your views on nothing but anecdotes like everyone else.
What's obvious to the rest of us is just that you suck at this game. And I don't really care if you feel like quitting. :) |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
251
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 18:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:its funny because tankers can now sit on a tower with a railgun, and are about 5x as effective as any infantry unit pre 1.7. Ask buzzzzzzzz kiilllllllllllllllllllll for details Forge gunners doing it is fine, but tankers doing it is OP. Double standards all the way. Oh right totally the same.... well except with double the range forge guns ever had, double the DPS, with a great zoom, while being invulnerable to infantry, faster than infantry, and stronger than infantry.... but yeah totally the same.
Yeah, because forge gunners and HAV's totally have the same elevation in aiming... Oh wait a minute! |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
253
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 19:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:calisk galern wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:calisk galern wrote:really? you're actually going to try to deny his points with anecdotal evidence of how you are the magical jesus of blowing up tanks?
all right then....
may I suggest video evidence of your elite tank fighting skills, I personally would enjoy watching the batman of tank fighting deal with tanks like they were your whipping boys.
I would like to add a rail gun tank is nothing like a forge gunner, the forge gunner is vulnerable, slow, has near to no anti-infantry capabilities, and if he's a good forge gunner probably costs more then the tank. Erm, what "evidence" do you complainers present to the contrary if not anecdotal? hmmm....how about every single video on your tube involving the numerous 6 tank steam rolls? how about the hundreds of players that feel like quitting after being rolled game after game after game because they don't have 20+ million sp characters with anti tank fits. math, has been presented, videos presented, numerous steam rolls, ambush is practically unplayable because of them, what more do you want -.-. I can find the threads, and the videos, but seriously why do I need to, it's been discussed, av is likely getting buffed, i'm just shocked someone wants to still use the "I can pop a tank with my 35 million sp character, so tanks must be balanced" defence. Still just anecdotal evidence. Here's some more anecdotal evidence: I got popped by a forge gunner yesterday. If you feel like calling me a "bad tanker" because of it, then i suggest you put your money where your mouth is. What I thought was funny here is how you whiners seem to consider your "evidence" to be "scientific" (or something) when you are all just as biased and base your views on nothing but anecdotes like everyone else. What's obvious to the rest of us is just that you suck at this game. And I don't really care if you feel like quitting. :) yep not worth my time talking with someone of your type
Nope, spend your time coming up with an actual case instead. Then we can talk. |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
253
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 21:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:its funny because tankers can now sit on a tower with cilgun, and are about 5x as effective as any infantry unit pre 1.7. Ask buzzzzzzzz kiilllllllllllllllllllll for details Forge gunners doing it is fine, but tankers doing it is OP. Double standards all the way. ARGGHHHHH the irony is killing me!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You do understand that currently tanks can camp towers while infantry cannot, due to tanks having a longer range on their rail weaponry than infantry? All you have to do is fly on top of a tower, recall dropship, deploy MLT railgun tank with double damage mods. Where in my statement did i say that forge gun camping on a tower or tanks camping on a tower is OP? Please find it, as i would greatly appreciate viewing my invisible statement. Currently, tankers (yourself included, if you can consider yourself a tanker) complain that tower camping with a forge gun is OP, should not be done, etc. However, you have had a way to fight back against this, albeit rather difficultly, with a railgun which can one shot the infantry. Whereas now, if a tanker is sitting on a tower, infantry AV is powerless to intervene, as their weapons are ineffective at that range. You could be more hypocritical and nonsensical than Tankahiro, and thats really saying something
And you do understand that the turret elevation prevents a tank completely from doing what you describe, right?
A tank can't aim very well at all below its hull.
|
Leonid Tybalt
Fatal Absolution
General Tso's Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.02.24 12:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:its funny because tankers can now sit on a tower with a railgun, and are about 5x as effective as any infantry unit pre 1.7. Ask buzzzzzzzz kiilllllllllllllllllllll for details Forge gunners doing it is fine, but tankers doing it is OP. Double standards all the way. Oh right totally the same.... well except with double the range forge guns ever had, double the DPS, with a great zoom, while being invulnerable to infantry, faster than infantry, and stronger than infantry.... but yeah totally the same. Yeah, because forge gunners and HAV's totally have the same elevation in aiming... Oh wait a minute! Joke post? Joke post. You can't honestly think that is even remotely comparible right? So HAVs have a 50 degree elevation restriction, and that totally evens out the invulnerability to 90% of the game, oh and the incredible speed, oh and the cheapness, and being non-sp intensive, and double the range, and double the DPS, and easily travesing terrain that would make a heavy cry, and .... Well I think I made my point.
No im very serious.
Seems to me that there's a trend among you complainers to only take factors into account that supports your views on the matter, while tactically ignoring other factors that might serve to oppose your arguments.
It's making you look rather dishonest and biased.
Also a tank is a much bigger target than one guy on foot, making it easier to hit. Just another of many factors that you seem to ignore when you're doing your jackass comparisons. I wonder why... |
|
|
| |
|