DUST Search - PROTO vs. MLT/STD/ADV

All Channels

General Discussions

PROTO vs. MLT/STD/ADV

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
UR M0MMA AUT0B0TS 7	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:38:00 - [1] - Quote There should be levels of gameplay:[ *1st level: Milita and standard fits only= Little ISK gain but is safe for people running those suits *2nd level: Advanced suits and modules= Better ISK gain than prev. level but still keeps protos out and evens out the battlefield. *3rd level: Proto and everything else= Best ISK payout and salvage along with other incentives to make people strive to get access to this level. Other things such as WP and SP gain should vary for each level to make it worth while. I think that would be a good start to make the gameplay a lot more evenly matched.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7324	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:38:00 - [2] - Quote No there shouldn't, this is a persistent world, you don't get to make those kinds of choices. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 5811	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:40:00 - [3] - Quote Stop trying to split the game further. We want teiricide, not tieriphiles. Never forget May 14, 2013: Beta 2.0
GHOSTLY ANNIHILATOR The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 1131	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:45:00 - [4] - Quote There should but just think of how that can be abused. Js G£«ASSAULT AK.0 !!!!!*G£« {{BACK ON DUST}}!!!!!!!! Check out my Youtube
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2014	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:48:00 - [5] - Quote No there should be null sec and high sec public contracts, high sec has a strict matchmaking performance based. Null sec is what we have now. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p TRA1LBLAZERS 704	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:52:00 - [6] - Quote make it so that people are incentivized to put proto into 3rd tier, but don't remove the possibility of it being used in 1st tier, as this is a sandbox game Kills- Archduke Ferdinand Balance!
CLONE117 planetary retaliation organisation ACME Holding Conglomerate 684	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:52:00 - [7] - Quote kinda gets rid of the risk vs reward system in away.
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 5811	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:54:00 - [8] - Quote Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: make it so that people are incentivized to put proto into 3rd tier, but don't remove the possibility of it being used in 1st tier, as this is a sandbox game Or, and here's a better idea, we remove tiers altogether? I amaze myself sometimes. Never forget More tiericide, less tieriphiles.
Galvan Nized Deep Space Republic 671	Posted - 2014.02.19 22:58:00 - [9] - Quote True Adamance wrote: No there shouldn't, this is a persistent world, you don't get to make those kinds of choices. How do you explain the Battle Academy then? It's pretty much the same thing. This could work, we definitely need at least one more mode with higher payout that pulls all the vets off of younger players. It could split they playerbase too much but then people may not immediately quit once they leave the academy either. I for one would accept these restrictions if it meant more players.
CLONE117 planetary retaliation organisation ACME Holding Conglomerate 684	Posted - 2014.02.19 23:01:00 - [10] - Quote i kinda had the idea of an open door restriction. ill just put the link to very old thread..which is probably on the very bottom of the forums currently.. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=130727&find=unread

ERYN Warchild Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic 15	Posted - 2014.02.19 23:09:00 - [11] - Quote It may take a full clip to kill a proto-heavy with my std sniper but the delicious reward points. So I lose. It's a game. Why does everything have to hold your hand? Life is vicious. Suck it up.
low genius The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance 1257	Posted - 2014.02.19 23:28:00 - [12] - Quote it should be dictated by sec status.
Nothing Certain Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 256	Posted - 2014.02.19 23:33:00 - [13] - Quote UR M0MMA wrote: There should be levels of gameplay:[ *1st level: Milita and standard fits only= Little ISK gain but is safe for people running those suits *2nd level: Advanced suits and modules= Better ISK gain than prev. level but still keeps protos out and evens out the battlefield. *3rd level: Proto and everything else= Best ISK payout and salvage along with other incentives to make people strive to get access to this level. Other things such as WP and SP gain should vary for each level to make it worth while. I think that would be a good start to make the gameplay a lot more evenly matched. Yeah, they could make like, PC for serious competition, FW for mid-level, and have public matches for newer players. No one would **** that up. Because, that's why.
ERYN Warchild Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic 15	Posted - 2014.02.19 23:42:00 - [14] - Quote Veteran players in std or adv gear are still veteran. They have the tactical and situation awareness that allows them to do so well. Sure it may take less hits to kill them but they still have team work and communication. What you are asking is them to nerf team work. Which in my opinion is silly.
Meeko Fent Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State 1762	Posted - 2014.02.20 00:09:00 - [15] - Quote True Adamance wrote: No there shouldn't, this is a persistent world, you don't get to make those kinds of choices. That would imply that we stay wherever we are in DUST, i.e. Open-World. Sadly, we have not the technology. Looking for a Interesting Character Name? Why Not Zoidberg?
Bazookah Tooth NECROM0NGERS The CORVOS 426	Posted - 2014.02.20 00:18:00 - [16] - Quote ERYN Warchild wrote: It may take a full clip to kill a proto-heavy with my std sniper but the delicious reward points. So I lose. It's a game. Why does everything have to hold your hand? Life is vicious. Suck it up. Your gonna become famous with your "suck it up, I'm better then you and I'm a noob" posts "I believe it's a sin not to rule the world if you've been blessed with the strength!" Justice HMG for life
Yan Darn Forsaken Immortals Top Men. 241	Posted - 2014.02.20 00:35:00 - [17] - Quote TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: make it so that people are incentivized to put proto into 3rd tier, but don't remove the possibility of it being used in 1st tier, as this is a sandbox game Or, and here's a better idea, we remove tiers altogether? I amaze myself sometimes. ^ I can make a ton of fittings on just my STD scout - tiered suits defeat the point of both specialisation and versatility. Frankly, it's just a very lazy way to give a sense of progression and character development I'm not sure why CCP went down the same pointless road a second time. I was hoping the removal of BPOs had something to do with implementing tiercide, but I'm not sure... You probably don't know me. But next time you get gunned down or exploded by a Valor scout...check the name.
UR M0MMA AUT0B0TS 9	Posted - 2014.02.20 01:52:00 - [18] - Quote ERYN Warchild wrote: nerf team work. Yea NERF team work!! *I fluxed up*


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.