|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1113
   |
Posted - 2014.02.19 05:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=136370&find=unread
feedback section of the forums, top of the page |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1113
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 06:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
NK Scout wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=136370&find=unread
feedback section of the forums, top of the page Not the bonuses, the bonuses effect at 5, but I think I found the numbers
its written in plain english.. just multiply by 5
math is hard |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1113
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 06:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cruxio wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Cal scouts can get well below 15dB. Gëê13.7, actually. 45-(45*.35) = 29.25dB (skills alone) 29.25-(29.25*.532) = 13.7 (4 cplx precision mods) Stacking penalty formula taken from here. To my knowledge, the stacking penalty is the same in Eve. Interesting, so your actually adding your %'s together? I was always told otherwise Also even if you were adding your percentages together, your second part seems off (or I'm off) I got 54.4 compared to your 53.2 20+17.4+11.4+5.6 So... what did I goof on?
its
(suit bonus 1) * (skill bonus 1) * (module bonus 1) * (DR module bonus 2) * ( DR module bonus 3) etc etc
each module is calculated seperatly and stacks with previous modules but suffers from diminishing returns (stacking penalty DR) for every module past the 2nd.
you never add together |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1115
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:Cruxio wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Cal scouts can get well below 15dB. Gëê13.7, actually. 45-(45*.35) = 29.25dB (skills alone) 29.25-(29.25*.532) = 13.7 (4 cplx precision mods) Stacking penalty formula taken from here. To my knowledge, the stacking penalty is the same in Eve. Interesting, so your actually adding your %'s together? I was always told otherwise Also even if you were adding your percentages together, your second part seems off (or I'm off) I got 54.4 compared to your 53.2 20+17.4+11.4+5.6 So... what did I goof on? its (suit bonus 1) * (skill bonus 1) * (module bonus 1) * (DR module bonus 2) * ( DR module bonus 3) etc etc each module is calculated seperatly and stacks with previous modules but suffers from diminishing returns (stacking penalty DR) for every module past the 2nd. you never add together You are all terrible at math.  A Caldari with four complex precision enhancers would have a scan precision of 16.78 dB. The following equation demonstrates how this number is arrived at: Profile dampening skill is calculated thusly: 1 + .2 GÇó Lv = x 45x(1 - .25) GÇó (1 - .2) GÇó (1 - (.869 GÇó .2)) GÇó (1 - (.571 GÇó .2)) GÇó (1 - (.283 GÇó .2)) = 16.78
lol calling me terrible at math.... then you proceed to use the exact same math but with numbers instead of words
also simplify if your going to try to be all specific, 1-.25 is the exact same as .75, 1-.2 =.8, etc etc etc |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1115
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:lol calling me terrible at math.... then you proceed to use the exact same math but with numbers instead of words
also simplify if your going to try to be all specific, 1-.25 is the exact same as .75, 1-.2 =.8, etc etc etc Don't know what you're talking about. My comment wasn't directed at you, which should have been obvious by the math involved. Also, it was a demonstration of how the math is arrived at, not trying to ease the burden trying to teach. The equation I posted was very acurate. If you want acurat results you'll follow my math.
you were missing the precision enhancement skill bonus :P |
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1115
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 07:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:lol calling me terrible at math.... then you proceed to use the exact same math but with numbers instead of words
also simplify if your going to try to be all specific, 1-.25 is the exact same as .75, 1-.2 =.8, etc etc etc Don't know what you're talking about. My comment wasn't directed at you, which should have been obvious by the math involved. Also, it was a demonstration of how the math is arrived at, not trying to ease the burden trying to teach. The equation I posted was very acurate. If you want acurat results you'll follow my math. you were missing the precision enhancement skill bonus :P No im not. Is = x.
i missed that :P
|
|
|
| |
|