Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![Scott Knight Scott Knight](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Scott Knight
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
39
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.14 05:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
After thinking about ambush, I came up with this idea. Suppose both sides have a fort with a hackable objective inside. You have two -five minutes to prepare before the battle starts so that you could place installations, proximity mines, etc. The objective is that the first group who breaks into the opponents fort and hacks the objective wins.
Or maybe make it more capture the flag like where you take the objective out and back to your base to score points. Would be awesome I do believe. |
![sebastian the huds sebastian the huds](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
sebastian the huds
Legions of Infinite Dominion Zero-Day
0
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.14 13:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
I like this idea and all but what role could the objective we hack play in the bigger picture? Like the objectives we have now shoot down massive command centers. Maybe we could capture a bomb of a sort to blow up an installation that prevents OB support on that planet. That would be pretty cool.
Usually outnumbered 7:1 and still kicking
|
![Aikuchi Tomaru Aikuchi Tomaru](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1784
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.14 14:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
No. That wouldn't really be different from skirmish. A game mode like that would need 2 teams with different goals. For example one team must defend the fort until a timer runs out while the other team has to capture it. 2 forts would be weird.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
![Scott Knight Scott Knight](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Scott Knight
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
41
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.14 22:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yeah I actually thought about that after I posted. Maybe the idea is that you are setting charged explosives.
The primary difference between this idea and skirmish would be the objective being located inside a building/cave/some other structure. |
![JP Acuna JP Acuna](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
JP Acuna
Pendejitos Canis Eliminatus Operatives
65
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.14 23:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think it's a good idea. The team that divides defense/offense in the best way would win. |
![sebastian the huds sebastian the huds](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
sebastian the huds
Legions of Infinite Dominion Zero-Day
0
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.17 01:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scott Knight wrote:Yeah I actually thought about that after I posted. Maybe the idea is that you are setting charged explosives.
The primary difference between this idea and skirmish would be the objective being located inside a building/cave/some other structure. So it could be a game mode where vehicles and OB support mean next to nothing? That could keep people from complaining about vehicles controling the game. I like it.
Usually outnumbered 7:1 and still kicking
|
![True Adamance True Adamance](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_amarr_128.jpg)
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
7148
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.17 02:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
I love the idea of a siege...but hate the idea of arcadey capture the flag mechanics.
New Eden is cold and harsh and not for the weak.
Give those fortress defenders heavy blaster cannon bunkers and angled terrain to slow us down and force up along narrow pathways, make us bleed and die for every slow agonizing step we take up those massive bastion walls. And let us all cry out with exhilaration as we beat the keep and take it for ourselves!
"Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
|
![True Adamance True Adamance](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_amarr_128.jpg)
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
7148
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.17 02:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
sebastian the huds wrote:Scott Knight wrote:Yeah I actually thought about that after I posted. Maybe the idea is that you are setting charged explosives.
The primary difference between this idea and skirmish would be the objective being located inside a building/cave/some other structure. So it could be a game mode where vehicles and OB support mean next to nothing? That could keep people from complaining about vehicles controling the game. I like it.
Nope in any siege vehicles will play integral parts being mobile cover, busting bunkers and turrets, carrying troops into underground garages, providing bunker like support and reps.
"Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
|
![Scott Knight Scott Knight](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_caldari_128.jpg)
Scott Knight
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
43
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.17 20:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
My original goal was not to make vehicles useless, but to add a different kind of scenario.
Also there should never be a capture the flag game mode, vehicles present a problem with that aspect. So maybe the goal is to plant explosives and when say three explosives get planted you win. (With the option to defuse explosives) |
![low genius low genius](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_minmatar_128.jpg)
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
1256
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.17 20:49:00 -
[10] - Quote
as a play on that:
how about instead of something to hack, you have to hold an objective by player-count. a small socket is designated as a zone, and you capture it by having more people within the zone than the other team.
|
|
![sebastian the huds sebastian the huds](https://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/img/character_creator/male_gallente_128.jpg)
sebastian the huds
Legions of Infinite Dominion Zero-Day
0
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2014.02.19 14:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maybe just add some game modes where we can just f*ck about for an unpresidented amount of time on the district that our corps fought so hard to get and get literally no reward for.
Usually outnumbered 7:1 and still kicking
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |