Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
317
   |
Posted - 2014.02.14 05:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Texs Red wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:[
True true. But still the Ar is a lot better at CQ.
Im NOT TALKING the = ''oh i find an enemy and stand there receiving RR shots to the face while i hipfire my AR at the roof and then come to the Forums to QQ on how the RR is the best weapon at CQ,'' kind of CQ of course....
I am willing to prove how a profile dampened assault with an AR can pretty much wreck anything... I would love to have a profile damped Gallente assault with an AR (proper Gallente tactics), however a Caldari assault with a RR could do it better. The Caldari could retain tank (shields) while gaining a profile low enough to avoid ADV scanners and the RR is superior to the AR at hipfire, range, and damage per clip so why use the AR?
This is not frogking spread sheets in space.
There are tooooooo many human variables that blow the statistical DPS bullsiht right out of the water.
On paper, the dps of a kalaak rail rolls in the 480 range. Try walking with that damn thing in ads and hitting each shot.
Then add in a simple adadadada strafe.
Then the enemy jumps.
And since each bolt has a travel time that is different at each range, each enemy movement has a higher chance to miss being hit by the bolt.
All of a sudden your 42 bolt mag is empty and that smug bastard is running off with 75% armor.
This goes the same for the AR.
Strafe, dance, jump blah blah blah.
putting raw DPS stats into a discussion in a FPS is mind-blowingly ignorant.
There are simply too f c king many battlefield variations that mess up everything excel told you about.
PS why are we mucking about with medium suit profiles, theyre goign to get scanned unless your insane with fitting?
CEO of SAM-MIK...sometimes. (shhh don't tell anyone, they'll start asking questions)
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
317
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 05:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:Texs Red wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:[
True true. But still the Ar is a lot better at CQ.
Im NOT TALKING the = ''oh i find an enemy and stand there receiving RR shots to the face while i hipfire my AR at the roof and then come to the Forums to QQ on how the RR is the best weapon at CQ,'' kind of CQ of course....
I am willing to prove how a profile dampened assault with an AR can pretty much wreck anything... I would love to have a profile damped Gallente assault with an AR (proper Gallente tactics), however a Caldari assault with a RR could do it better. The Caldari could retain tank (shields) while gaining a profile low enough to avoid ADV scanners and the RR is superior to the AR at hipfire, range, and damage per clip so why use the AR? Do shields or armor increase scan profile in eve?
shields
and theres very little you can do to dampen profiles in eve
CEO of SAM-MIK...sometimes. (shhh don't tell anyone, they'll start asking questions)
|