|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
zibathy numbertwo
Nox Aeterna Security
386
   |
Posted - 2014.02.04 08:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Land:
LAV (LIGHT ******* ATTACK VEHICLE): Light transport/skirmish against infantry/a¦¦r¦¦m¦¦o¦¦r¦¦
MAV: Anti-Infantry, small turrets for OK Anti-Armor
HAV: Anti-Vehicle, small turrets for OK Anti-Infantry (PLEASE try to argue Missiles and Railguns do not decimate any and every vehicle, Blasters are OP against infantry)
Air:
Fighter: Anti-Infantry, small turrets for OK Anti-Armor
Dropship: Transport/skirmish against infantry/armor
Bomber: Anti-Vehicle, small turrets for OK Anti-Infantry
What we have now:
HAV: KILLS EVERYTHING BEST IN GAME GG HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
LAV: SUICIDE BOMBING ALLAHU AKBAR DEATH TO INFIDELS AHAHAHAHA
DROPSHIP: RDV. RAILGUN INSTALLATIONS. LOLOLOL OL O O ALWODOAWLDLASLD 
What we should have now:
LAV: Light transport/skirmish against infantry/armor
HAV: Anti-Vehicle, small turrets for OK Anti-Infantry
Dropship: Transport/skirmish against infantry/armor
CCP, make HAV better fit its correct role by making their main turrets (e.g. basically just the blaster) far weaker against infantry. Sharks (HAV) eat Tuna fish (other vehicles), not minnows (infantry).
Also make LAVs better capable of skirmishing against armor by buffing small turrets and balancing LAVs in relation to each other (Saga vs. Methana). Allow LAV to seat 3 passengers if you remove the small turret. Release vehicles for other classifications of AIR and LAND so we have a complete food chain.
Thanks.
Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
|
zibathy numbertwo
Nox Aeterna Security
386
|
Posted - 2014.02.04 08:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
This basic game design concept brought to you by Nox Aeterna Security; count on us for all of your security related needs.
Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
|
zibathy numbertwo
Nox Aeterna Security
386
|
Posted - 2014.02.04 08:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
HAHA OOPS I THOUGHT I WAS POSTING ON THE DUST 514 FORUMS
GUESS YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT PLANNED VEHICLES FOR SAID GAME
LET ME SHOW YOU THE DOOR, STUPID :D !
Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
|
zibathy numbertwo
Nox Aeterna Security
391
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 03:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bump
Do people really think that HAVs need to be anti-infantry when 2/3 of the turrets are superb AV?
I think the fighter would better fit an anti-infantry role because it balances out vehicle combat. Only having MAV be dedicated anti-infantry may seem a bit weird, but I'd be fine with a fighter being AV.
I was thinking of the fighter being more along the lines of an attack helicopter or little bird, y'know?
Long Live Freedom; Long Live the Federation.
|
|
|
| |
|