| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lorhak Gannarsein
1442
   |
Posted - 2014.02.01 15:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
So when you try to spool up your railgun turret (large or small) but cancel without firing a shot, your turret needs some time to 'vent' before you can spool again.
The RR doesn't have this.
I feel like if pre-spooling wasn't so easy, the RR would be much less effective at CQC, which is, of course, the primary concern.
On another note, people often complain about the RR that you had time to spin 180 degrees to kill the guy sneaking up on you; I'd just like to point out that this is not a situation in which the spool time should punish the defender, considering that an AR could kill you in the same timeframe.
Happily printing ISK with permahardeners and MLT blasters.
Just let me get a couple mil more before nerf, CCP!
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
368
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
in addition to huge spread and hip fire kick, i agree
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Help Shields
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
1445
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:in addition to huge spread and hip fire kick, i agree
Hip fire kick sure, but spread wouldn't actually stop people using it at CQC; it'd just drive the people who are competent enough to land all those shots to migrate to the CR.
Happily printing ISK with permahardeners and MLT blasters.
Just let me get a couple mil more before nerf, CCP!
|
CRYPT3C W0LF
MK.V
316
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Why not have an overheating feature like Its larger counterpart?
Ahhhh....
CPM? Nononono
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
1446
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
CRYPT3C W0LF wrote:Why not have an overheating feature like Its larger counterpart?
Not really a good comparison, considering that blasters overheat and AR doesn't, and also that overheat for RR means quite a lot of balancing.
Furthermore, the idea isn't to make it hard to start shooting AND hard to KEEP shooting, but to lower (not negate) its CQC performance somewhat; ideally without touching DPS, because that affects its performance at range, too. And considering its competitor at range is the (underrepresented at the moment, in my opinion) ScR, it needs to keep most of that DPS.
Happily printing ISK with permahardeners and MLT blasters.
Just let me get a couple mil more before nerf, CCP!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |