|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bradric Banewolf
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
64
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 06:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe wrote:The HAV is a frontline combat vehicle. The LAV is a transport/support vehicle. They don't work the same way. I don't think this stretches reason too much.
Besides, it stands to reason there should be at least one vehicle that you can use without having to get a whole squad together. Sure, but the tank isn't that vehicle?! Dropships already fly and fire with on3 operator. To do so much damage should take multiple operators. There are no one man tanks in real life. It doesn't make sense to give one player a mobile fortress while ground troops get nerfed weapons to deter it with. And before you say "get a tank" no! I'm a real fighter thank you.
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
66
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 21:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:We still need a tank that can be operated solo.
Just make it so you have Xhav's and Hav's. Xhav's have 40% extra HP, and use OP's idea. Also they have 4/3 slot layout.
Hav's maintain their current speed, and operate decently solo. Xhav's operate in a team and will stomp any Hav because it's bigger, and has more slots/fitting.
Hav's need fitting reduced, as to not be able to fit proto turret, an all proto modules on a base hull. Hav's should have to sacrifice, a nitrous? Or what about a damage mod? Shield extender?
Xhav's would gain that lost fitting, and quite possibly have 2 large turrets. Or make it 1xl, 1l, and 1 S/M.
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
66
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 21:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:We still need a tank that can be operated solo.
Just make it so you have Xhav's and Hav's. Xhav's have 40% extra HP, and use OP's idea. Also they have 4/3 slot layout.
Hav's maintain their current speed, and operate decently solo. Xhav's operate in a team and will stomp any Hav because it's bigger, and has more slots/fitting.
Hav's need fitting reduced, as to not be able to fit proto turret, an all proto modules on a base hull. Hav's should have to sacrifice, a nitrous? Or what about a damage mod? Shield extender?
Xhav's would gain that lost fitting, and quite possibly have 2 large turrets. Or make it 1xl, 1l, and 1 S/M.
The speed is the problem not the hp?! I can kill easily if they weren't able to just run to the redline at the speed of an lav?!
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ The Umbra Combine
66
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 21:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Tanks should stay as one man vehicles. But tanks should be about killing other vehicles. They should have to rely on small turrets to protect them from infantry.
There should also be a LAV that let's you use the turret and drive at the same time.
Your clearly not playing the same game?! Why do so many ppl want this "easy mode" for dust? Scrap the "I win button" please?! Tanks ARE rediculously OP! Flat out pointblank man?! If you need to be engaged by a squad just for you to be downed, then you should require help! Operator and gunner for all vehicles! Dropships need gunners, lav's need a gunner, so why not hav's? These "one man fortresses" are bs?!
And this idea about a one man lav is ludicrous! Remember murder taxi's! Same thing, different concept?! So many of you guys just want to be invincible it's ridiculous lol! No work ethic?! No more heavily armored, heavily shielded, one man army, powerful blaster cannon carrying, super vehicles?! If u wanna tank fine! More power to ya! But know, like the rest of us, that you will die?! If I choose to run proto I can't get mad at people when I loose money by dying! I'm not gonna run a balac's gar 21, and require the whole squad to keep me alive so I don't loose my rifle?! That's selfish as h***!?
If you bring it to battle, prepare to loose it! No "I win buttons"!
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
|
|
|