DUST Search - RA Locks Districts

All Channels

The War Room

RA Locks Districts

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Heimdallr69 1530	Posted - 2014.02.01 22:26:00 - [301] - Quote You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Arirana Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 424	Posted - 2014.02.01 22:40:00 - [302] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. God no. Please. We are all hypocrites. Inferring AE isn't is just gonna make them rage... I have an ego?! O.O The scales have fallen from my eyes.
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1475	Posted - 2014.02.01 22:41:00 - [303] - Quote Arirana wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. God no. Please. We are all hypocrites. Inferring AE isn't is just gonna make them rage... AE=Hypocrites Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Arirana Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 424	Posted - 2014.02.01 22:46:00 - [304] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Arirana wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. God no. Please. We are all hypocrites. Inferring AE isn't is just gonna make them rage... AE=Hypocrites lol. Why am I even here? both sides pointing fingers and still refusing to admit what they really are. This thread is officially a waste of my time. I have an ego?! O.O The scales have fallen from my eyes.
Heimdallr69 1530	Posted - 2014.02.01 22:54:00 - [305] - Quote Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1475	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:08:00 - [306] - Quote Arirana wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Arirana wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. God no. Please. We are all hypocrites. Inferring AE isn't is just gonna make them rage... AE=Hypocrites lol. Why am I even here? both sides pointing fingers and still refusing to admit what they really are. This thread is officially a waste of my time. Too bad you can't even admit cheating is wrong. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1475	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:12:00 - [307] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. AE blues up every competitive corp but a few uses it's billions of ISK and hundreds of people against a few corps complains about locking. If AE was at war with NS or DDB maybe people wouldn't lock up. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Shiyou Hidiyoshi 68	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:17:00 - [308] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Arirana wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Arirana wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: You stupid hypocrites. Unlock your districts before speaking out of turn. God no. Please. We are all hypocrites. Inferring AE isn't is just gonna make them rage... AE=Hypocrites lol. Why am I even here? both sides pointing fingers and still refusing to admit what they really are. This thread is officially a waste of my time. Too bad you can't even admit cheating is wrong. Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Will awoky woky Rampage in PC for Chucky Cheese tokens. C C P corp is full of scrubs, application to FWA REJECTED! :P
Long Evity 1449	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:19:00 - [309] - Quote Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
Himiko Kuronaga Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 2889	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:19:00 - [310] - Quote AE has nearly a limitless supply of clones to attack with and more than enough members and allies to field any attack and stack any timer that might need stacking. If the game wasn't designed in such a silly way, they would have been unlocked a long time ago. Getting your foot in the door when the blue donut is in town is very difficult. AE did not accomplish this on their own. EoN had to retire first.

Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1475	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:22:00 - [311] - Quote http://youtu.be/J6H52yHy1Dk definitely not OP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFhvDyjYoU0 From a different perspective. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Shiyou Hidiyoshi 68	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:25:00 - [312] - Quote Long Evity wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> Better than what melee is now :P Also, if you can't kill 1 guy running towards you with a whole squad, there is a problem with your squad. By the way, people in NF used the glitch against me ALL the time during FEC, shhhhhhhh non one will know. Just between you and me lol. Quick! Spam the thread so it gets lost in the numerous pages. Will awoky woky Rampage in PC for Chucky Cheese tokens. C C P corp is full of scrubs, application to FWA REJECTED! :P
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1475	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:27:00 - [313] - Quote Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Long Evity wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> Better than what melee is now :P Also, if you can't kill 1 guy running towards you with a whole squad, there is a problem with your squad. By the way, people in NF used the glitch against me ALL the time during FEC, shhhhhhhh non one will know. Just between you and me lol. Quick! Spam the thread so it gets lost in the numerous pages. The point is it was completely broken and Over Powered and Arirana that it was completely fine and has no remorse. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Long Evity 1449	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:28:00 - [314] - Quote Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Long Evity wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> Better than what melee is now :P Also, if you can't kill 1 guy running towards you with a whole squad, there is a problem with your squad. By the way, people in NF used the glitch against me ALL the time during FEC, shhhhhhhh non one will know. Just between you and me lol. Quick! Spam the thread so it gets lost in the numerous pages. NF wasn't around for the FEC. And if they were - it was when AE Was with us. >_>;; I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
Shiyou Hidiyoshi 68	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:37:00 - [315] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Long Evity wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> Better than what melee is now :P Also, if you can't kill 1 guy running towards you with a whole squad, there is a problem with your squad. By the way, people in NF used the glitch against me ALL the time during FEC, shhhhhhhh non one will know. Just between you and me lol. Quick! Spam the thread so it gets lost in the numerous pages. The point is it was completely broken and Over Powered and Arirana that it was completely fine and has no remorse. That video is funny, a guy who was injured that did not see the enemy behind him sneaking up on him and when he does, he is shooting him and didn't instantly die. If Jungian had a shotgun, that guy would have died before he had a chance to react. Also, I was referring to TP Sota. Will awoky woky Rampage in PC for Chucky Cheese tokens. C C P corp is full of scrubs, application to FWA REJECTED! :P
Long Evity 1449	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:41:00 - [316] - Quote Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Long Evity wrote: Shiyou Hidiyoshi wrote: Careful, Ari used a glitch that was so OP because he had to run up in your face and hit you a few times and there is nothing you could do about it. It is not like you could of just shoot him. It was so OP that if he didn't use it but used a shotgun, you would die faster. It's not like melee isn't useless 99% of the time and practically no one would ever spec into the melee modules. O wait... Yea, 1 hitting entire squads at objectives isn't OP at all... going 30+ kills each game - yea, very easy to stop... Especially for a fat, slow, large hit box heavy who needs a little bit of time to kill you, but you need only an instant to kill me. Not OP at all. >_> Better than what melee is now :P Also, if you can't kill 1 guy running towards you with a whole squad, there is a problem with your squad. By the way, people in NF used the glitch against me ALL the time during FEC, shhhhhhhh non one will know. Just between you and me lol. Quick! Spam the thread so it gets lost in the numerous pages. The point is it was completely broken and Over Powered and Arirana that it was completely fine and has no remorse. That video is funny, a guy who was injured that did not see the enemy behind him sneaking up on him and when he does, he is shooting him and didn't instantly die. If Jungian had a shotgun, that guy would have died before he had a chance to react. Also, I was referring to TP Sota. TP wasn't NF at the time - that's still EoN. :3 I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
Heimdallr69 1530	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:47:00 - [317] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. AE blues up every competitive corp but a few uses it's billions of ISK and hundreds of people against a few corps complains about locking. If AE was at war with NS or DDB maybe people wouldn't lock up. AE didn't blew up with Eon so qft. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Benjamin Ciscko Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1477	Posted - 2014.02.01 23:59:00 - [318] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. AE blues up every competitive corp but a few uses it's billions of ISK and hundreds of people against a few corps complains about locking. If AE was at war with NS or DDB maybe people wouldn't lock up. AE didn't blew up with Eon so qft. When did I say AE blued up EoN? Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
Shiyou Hidiyoshi 70	Posted - 2014.02.02 00:03:00 - [319] - Quote This is the forums. I am not allowed to be accurate or tell the truth. I am suppose to lie and start drama. So I am going to say it was NF and uh........ Onslaught Inc. yes yes.... :3 fiddles with fingers Will awoky woky Rampage in PC for Chucky Cheese tokens. C C P corp is full of scrubs, application to FWA REJECTED! :P
Heimdallr69 1531	Posted - 2014.02.02 01:19:00 - [320] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. AE blues up every competitive corp but a few uses it's billions of ISK and hundreds of people against a few corps complains about locking. If AE was at war with NS or DDB maybe people wouldn't lock up. AE didn't blew up with Eon so qft. When did I say AE blued up EoN? AE blues up with every competitive corp, there you go. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro

lDocHollidayl Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance 499	Posted - 2014.02.02 02:32:00 - [321] - Quote Fiddlestaxp wrote: From a different thread(Context is "Why are we locking up districts") Arirana wrote: We did it because of the tactical advantage it gave to the coalition that is forming against us. They could take a snag at our districts whenever they wanted, meanwhile all we can do is defend and spend an hour trying to snipe. Stop talking about wanting to fix the game. You are locking up for the strategic advantage that it provides. Everything else is just meta. Not directed at Arirana ofc. At least he gives straight talk. Everything else is metafactured to make it look like you aren't doing it for the reason that you are actually doing it for. You are doing the exact same thing that TP did, for the exact same reasons, at less personal time invested and more profit. Let us be real here for a minute. The only thing different is that you are pretending like you are trying to "fix the game" by doing it. #meta Pardon good sir...how long were the districts open. The answer is very long. You may project all you would like. To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. Might I ask you how this conversation could ever be productive when your baseline is you know my motivations? Please, at your leisure, continue to fuel CCP's "tank of change" to improve all of our overall game play. Might I also pose a query? Why do you not have a single district open? Just one. So players can use PC as it was intended?
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 364	Posted - 2014.02.02 07:22:00 - [322] - Quote lDocHollidayl wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: From a different thread(Context is "Why are we locking up districts") Arirana wrote: We did it because of the tactical advantage it gave to the coalition that is forming against us. They could take a snag at our districts whenever they wanted, meanwhile all we can do is defend and spend an hour trying to snipe. Stop talking about wanting to fix the game. You are locking up for the strategic advantage that it provides. Everything else is just meta. Not directed at Arirana ofc. At least he gives straight talk. Everything else is metafactured to make it look like you aren't doing it for the reason that you are actually doing it for. You are doing the exact same thing that TP did, for the exact same reasons, at less personal time invested and more profit. Let us be real here for a minute. The only thing different is that you are pretending like you are trying to "fix the game" by doing it. #meta Pardon good sir...how long were the districts open. The answer is very long. You may project all you would like. To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. Might I ask you how this conversation could ever be productive when your baseline is you know my motivations? Please, at your leisure, continue to fuel CCP's "tank of change" to improve all of our overall game play. Might I also pose a query? Why do you not have a single district open? Just one. So players can use PC as it was intended? Teamplayers holds no districts. There is a gracious window of attack associated with all related organizations. I am not saying that you are doing anything wrong by following the playerbase in locking up. What I AM saying is that the purpose of this thread was meta and that you hold no altruistic "save the game" motive in doing so. You are locking up because it benefits you; not because it benefits the game. Many members of your corporation have complained about this in the past. What say they? Do they buy the line? Or do they not smell the **** they are stepping in...
CUBS UNbanned Alt 215	Posted - 2014.02.02 07:37:00 - [323] - Quote Fiddlestaxp wrote: lDocHollidayl wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: From a different thread(Context is "Why are we locking up districts") Arirana wrote: We did it because of the tactical advantage it gave to the coalition that is forming against us. They could take a snag at our districts whenever they wanted, meanwhile all we can do is defend and spend an hour trying to snipe. Stop talking about wanting to fix the game. You are locking up for the strategic advantage that it provides. Everything else is just meta. Not directed at Arirana ofc. At least he gives straight talk. Everything else is metafactured to make it look like you aren't doing it for the reason that you are actually doing it for. You are doing the exact same thing that TP did, for the exact same reasons, at less personal time invested and more profit. Let us be real here for a minute. The only thing different is that you are pretending like you are trying to "fix the game" by doing it. #meta Pardon good sir...how long were the districts open. The answer is very long. You may project all you would like. To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. Might I ask you how this conversation could ever be productive when your baseline is you know my motivations? Please, at your leisure, continue to fuel CCP's "tank of change" to improve all of our overall game play. Might I also pose a query? Why do you not have a single district open? Just one. So players can use PC as it was intended? Teamplayers holds no districts. There is a gracious window of attack associated with all related organizations. I am not saying that you are doing anything wrong by following the playerbase in locking up. What I AM saying is that the purpose of this thread was meta and that you hold no altruistic "save the game" motive in doing so. You are locking up because it benefits you; not because it benefits the game. Many members of your corporation have complained about this in the past. What say they? Do they buy the line? Or do they not smell the **** they are stepping in... #AriApoorspokesman#noonecaresjustplay#saveahorse ride a Ramp...Cowboy Don't drink the koolaid... Rampage made it from scratch and didn't wash his hands
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 367	Posted - 2014.02.02 07:40:00 - [324] - Quote lDocHollidayl wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: From a different thread(Context is "Why are we locking up districts") Arirana wrote: We did it because of the tactical advantage it gave to the coalition that is forming against us. They could take a snag at our districts whenever they wanted, meanwhile all we can do is defend and spend an hour trying to snipe. Stop talking about wanting to fix the game. You are locking up for the strategic advantage that it provides. Everything else is just meta. Not directed at Arirana ofc. At least he gives straight talk. Everything else is metafactured to make it look like you aren't doing it for the reason that you are actually doing it for. You are doing the exact same thing that TP did, for the exact same reasons, at less personal time invested and more profit. Let us be real here for a minute. The only thing different is that you are pretending like you are trying to "fix the game" by doing it. #meta Pardon good sir...how long were the districts open. The answer is very long. You may project all you would like. To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. Might I ask you how this conversation could ever be productive when your baseline is you know my motivations? Please, at your leisure, continue to fuel CCP's "tank of change" to improve all of our overall game play. Might I also pose a query? Why do you not have a single district open? Just one. So players can use PC as it was intended? TP's districts were all open for months and months before the mass attack came. We only received attacks from people who didn't know better until then. When they came, we were able to successfully defend them and gain ground in the process. I must admit though, they strained us. A good portion of our crew wanted to be playing FF14 and didn't want anything to do with this game at the time. I can't see how what you are doing is in any way different. I congratulate you for having the sense and foresight to see what holding more districts than you can reasonably defend causes. When TP hit 15% control, we figured that the wave would come at any second. Nobody had locked districts on that scale before and we didn't really know what to do. Our original idea was to just take more as a buffer against the assault that we knew would come eventually. It took until we held over a third of all territory for it it come, but we were expecting it for at least a month and a half beforehand. Between your corp, your shadowcorps (GODZAMONGMEN et. al) and your alliance, you must realize that you can not withstand a mass assault. Especially with two teams that can beat you at least 50% of the time... TP was concerned about a mass attack when 0 teams could beat us 50% of the time. Pretty sure AE's win rate at that point was 20% or lower against us. If we had known that we could just lock up and not have to farm the AFK money by playing out the defense, we would still probably hold 20%... Why can't you just admit that you saw the writing on the wall? Why do you have to deny what everyone already knows? *In case of a mass assault: TP, NF and all associated entities are NEUTRAL in every regard. Sufficient payment could (and would) change that.
The Black Art Fatal Absolution 380	Posted - 2014.02.02 07:56:00 - [325] - Quote lDocHollidayl wrote: To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. omniscient, not omnipotent. idk how being 'all powerful' would help anyone figure out your motivations.
2 Pistols Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 0	Posted - 2014.02.02 07:58:00 - [326] - Quote who is RA
Derrith Erador Fatal Absolution 808	Posted - 2014.02.02 14:38:00 - [327] - Quote The Black Art wrote: lDocHollidayl wrote: To believe you know another's motivation is strangely omnipotent. omniscient, not omnipotent. idk how being 'all powerful' would help anyone figure out your motivations. You're a douche, sir. beatin' slaves and whippin' knaves All in a days work for an Amarrican!
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution 4585	Posted - 2014.02.02 15:44:00 - [328] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. That is completely wrong. AE has been against district locking from the start, why would they suddenly start locking their own districts to get CCP to realize the problem?
CUBS UNbanned Alt 216	Posted - 2014.02.02 16:12:00 - [329] - Quote Honestly its a moot point. They have the right to lock their land just like everyone else. Is it sh1tty? Of course, but not any worse than everyone else. so the QQ over the largest landholders being the last ones on the bandwagon of locking districts is an entirely silly argument altogether. will it expedite ccp fixing the problem? Maybe, but as usual we have to be skeptical. if you are gonna QQ over anything, complain about the change in tune, and maybe the timing of doing this when the devs are on vacation... yea another poor choice for the decision makes makers... but QQ over locking? Pffft #rampagerolmodelisPeterGriffin#lockingisanarbitraryterm Don't drink the koolaid... Rampage made it from scratch and didn't wash his hands
Jenova Rhapsodos Fatal Absolution 169	Posted - 2014.02.02 16:23:00 - [330] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Wasn't towards AE.. After all I agree with what they're doing. You lock so they lock get over it. That is completely wrong. AE has been against district locking from the start, why would they suddenly start locking their own districts to get CCP to realize the problem?



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page