DUST Search - AE Claims to want to stamp out District Lockers

Leadfoot10 wrote:

I think one of the problems within this broken mechanic is we never know who the other side will bring....

If PX1 calls in AE, they will continue to beat ML....as was the case in the battle late last night.

If ML calls in FA, they will continue to beat PX1...as was the case earlier in the week.

If we both call in ringers, the ringers fight it out, and we get to twiddle our thumbs and have our big brothers fight our fights for us.

Where's the fun in that?

So we have a bit of a conundrum....with each side not knowing what the other will do.

What's most sad to me is that those PX1 vs ML battles tend to be very close and exciting ones. We've had some truly epic and nailbiting rounds between us, and it's disappointing to me we can't continue to experience the exhilaration of an evenly matched battle rather than hearing about how FA crushed PX1 or experiencing ML getting stomped by AE for the 30th time. lol

Here's looking forward to PC 2.0, where, hopefully, some of these issues will be resolved with PC taking a turn for the better....Leadfoot


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
m twiggz Pradox One Proficiency V. 325	Posted - 2014.01.31 09:20:00 - [1] - Quote Leadfoot10 wrote: I think one of the problems within this broken mechanic is we never know who the other side will bring.... If PX1 calls in AE, they will continue to beat ML....as was the case in the battle late last night. If ML calls in FA, they will continue to beat PX1...as was the case earlier in the week. If we both call in ringers, the ringers fight it out, and we get to twiddle our thumbs and have our big brothers fight our fights for us. Where's the fun in that? So we have a bit of a conundrum....with each side not knowing what the other will do. What's most sad to me is that those PX1 vs ML battles tend to be very close and exciting ones. We've had some truly epic and nailbiting rounds between us, and it's disappointing to me we can't continue to experience the exhilaration of an evenly matched battle rather than hearing about how FA crushed PX1 or experiencing ML getting stomped by AE for the 30th time. lol Here's looking forward to PC 2.0, where, hopefully, some of these issues will be resolved with PC taking a turn for the better....Leadfoot I thoroughly enjoyed the PX1 v. Molon Labe. PCs. The first two were very close, especially the second one. The third battle was 14 FA, Fusion Commander and Unique ID vs. 16 PX1, was no where near a close battle. If I recall properly, I have it written down at home (currently at work) the next 4 battles were also mostly FA. After using FA to slaughter us a few times ML started showing up for battles and won 2-4 of them before PX1 decided to call in AE and NF, which slaughtered you kind fellas. After all was said and done I think PX1 and ML only fought each other maybe 6 of those battles. All in all using ringers, full teams of ringers, is ridiculous. I can understand filling spots, at most a squad, of ringers if your low on players or have multiple battles is fine, but full teams? Where is the pride in that? I don't mean this in any offense to ML because we did it also, but honestly it's what makes PC so boring. You attack one corp and fight a different corp. You attack a different corp and fight the same ringers you fought in the previous PC. It's come down to regardless of who you attack you're fighting a mix-match of the same players over and over again.