|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
poison Diego
NECROM0NGERS
The CORVOS
301
   |
Posted - 2014.01.27 12:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think the idea with large blasters is to use them in blitzkrieg warfare, and they are significant in all types of warfare. they fullfill many roles such as holding objectives, keeping enemies at a place where they are not a threat to allies, make noise and ***** up enemy frontlines.
Having no blasters wouldnt work. then there wouldnt be any reason to call in a tank. there would be AVs hunting AVs for no reason. they are no threat on the battlefield, why would you have to take them out?
blasters create balance.
I agree they might do less damage to dropsuits and should have less range.
WELCOME TO WORLDofTANKz514
put your seatbelts on, ITs GONNA BE A BUMPY RIDE!!
and please SUCK ON MY BIG BLACK BLASTER!
|
poison Diego
NECROM0NGERS
The CORVOS
301
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 15:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:They need to be less of a supercharged AR and more of a tank turret, low ROF high damage and actually takes some skill to hit infantry. I have to agree that having a huge AR that does 130 DMG per shot on a tank that has waves of invulnerability is kind of... Off.
I say increase the damage, lower the ROF Significantly and make it a short-medium range ballistic turret made to **** up tanks and, IF the pilot is skilled enough, able to take out infantry with well placed shots as well.
Then fix the small rails and make it the infantry killer and maybe a feature where a small turret on a tank can be disabled (or damaged enough that the operator dies and the turret is unusable) this will allow the small turrets to decimate the infantry but have a counter that does not include blowing up the tank its stuck on.
we already have that. Its called railgun
WELCOME TO WORLDofTANKz514
put your seatbelts on, ITs GONNA BE A BUMPY RIDE!!
and please SUCK ON MY BIG BLACK BLASTER!
|
poison Diego
NECROM0NGERS
The CORVOS
303
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
8213 wrote:Roger Cordill wrote:Message from Godin: I'd said it already, and I'll say it again: This is ******* stupid. You know its funny that people complain about RRs as being to effective vs. infantry. But a turret that can shoot 100 rounds straight, do 100 damage a shot, has no recoil because its mounted, has 5000HP, and 10,000sEHP, and its sole purpose is to kill squishy unarmed soft-body contacts is okay... How about we let the guns and small turrets take care of the infantry...?
Does the proto RR cost 300k? NO!!! but it still does half the damage the Ion cannon does against infantry, costs 6x less and doesn't get f*cked in the ear by railguns so often. That's why people complain..
WELCOME TO WORLDofTANKz514
put your seatbelts on, ITs GONNA BE A BUMPY RIDE!!
and please SUCK ON MY BIG BLACK BLASTER!
|
|
|
| |
|