<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WoT is that way.

To start, yes I do think that Large Blaster Turrets should be removed. Tankers already have the cake. They shouldn't be able to eat it while blowing the counterpart's cake away too.

However, until CCP releases the Medium Attack Vehicle [MAV] HAVs would have no purpose on the battlefield. The only reason to field an HAV would be if someone else was to field an HAV. This would be flawed because without HAVs being able to effectively kill infantry, there would never be a need for the opponent to field an HAV in the first place.

Along with this, the 80GJ Blasters are the only Gallente Turret. It's bad enough that Matari and Amarrian pilots aren't able to effectively use their LP. If you remove a racial weapon, you'll need to replace it.

Until the MAVs arrive, I'd just settle on adjusting the ROF of the Turrets.

Solution: low tracking speed. AI laser dominance problem solved....on paper!

I can only imagine that there will be beam and Pulse lasers for the Amarr. Much like how Caldari have railgun (even though railguns can be both Gallente and Caldari >:[...) and missile in DUST.

I imagine Minmatar will get artillery/cannon type turrets and Gattling weapons.

But that only leaves Gallente with one turret type....unless...DRONES!

but I digress.

What if the beam type laser worked with a charging mechanic and similarly to the scrambler then time you charge it depends on the damage done to it. When firing the weapon it acts like a laser rifle except the beam last for a certain amount of time instead of when you let go of the trigger.

It would be ideal for massacring shield targets from range but because of the charge shot mechanic and because you have to keep your aim on the target while your beam is firing it would not be ideal for close range combat and dealing with smaller targets within a certain distance.

A pulse type on the other hand would be more like medium ranged and slightly more suited for Lighter targets and more mobile targets but can still engage other heavily armed objects.

What buff?

Blasters always did this damage, we even had compressed blasters which did 150 per shot at proto level and not the 136 we have now

All thats changed is that the blasters have ammo which infantry were screaming for

My bad, I'm not too knowledgeable about terms.

Why don't tanks have coaxil weapons?

What a nonsense idea, blasters are terrible in tank vs tank making them worse at tank vs infantry would be re-tarded, theres already a huge trade off, the problem isn't the turret its a teams lack of counter tankers.