The
Popular Poll is interesting, but it is easily manipulated. So, how is a reader to know which candidates deserve their attention, and which are just getting their friends or alts to sway the poll results? How can a player casually interested in the Election get an idea of which candidates to take seriously without reading through 500 posts in 20 threads? Well, one way would be to get the options of the hard core Election Junkies who have read all those 500 posts and formed informed opinions on the qualifications of the candidates.
In this thread I will be asking for feedback from those GÇ£ExpertsGÇ¥, the Election Junkies who have combed through all of those candidacy threads. To be included on the list of experts you have to post your assessment of the qualifications of each candidate, and have posted in a meaningful way in at least 5 of the candidacy threads. Members of CPM0 will be assumed to be experts.
What to do:
Copy and paste this list. Change the (Undecided) to (Yes) if you would recommend people consider that candidate for CPM; or to (No) if you feel the candidate is either not qualified, or has not yet shown themselves to be qualified. Leave it as (Undecided) if you are on the fence or have not yet studied their platform. Go back and edit your post if you change your mind, or new candidates join the race.
Candidates:Soraya Xel (Undecided)
Spartacus Dust (Undecided)
Aero Yassavi (Undecided)
The Black Jackal (Undecided)
Tech De Ra (Undecided)
Kevall Longstride (Undecided)
Poonmunch (Undecided)
SILENTSAM 69 (Undecided)
Aisha Ctarl (Undecided)
Hellsatano (Undecided)
Dalmont Legrand (Undecided)
TEXA5 HiTM4N (Undecided)
Mossellia Delt (Undecided)
Yokal Bob (Undecided)
Radar R4D-47 (Undecided)
Canari Elphus (Undecided)
If you donGÇÖt like giving a negative opinion you can leave the rest as Undecided.
Your (Yes) vote is saying: GÇ£Yes you should take the time to read this candidateGÇÖs thread and consider their ideas before you vote for CPM.GÇ¥
Your (No) vote is saying: GÇ£DonGÇÖt even bother reading this guyGÇÖs post. Either they have not provide enough information to convince anyone to vote for them, or they have provided enough information and proven that they are not up to the job.GÇ¥
I have decided to accept candidates as experts, because this is not just a vote for one position. Candidates will care deeply about who they have on the Council with them. Candidates
should vote for themselves. Candidates still must have posted constructively in 4 other candidate threads to qualify. (Their own thread counts as the 5th.)