|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
   |
Posted - 2014.01.24 21:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now what exactly did the enemy tank require?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 21:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:ER-Bullitt wrote:Is that all you've got? pity... I made the post not my corp, try to stay on topic You make a post, your repping your corp its how it goes on a forum You linked me with R* and now your crying when i took the **** out of you and your corp because ive seen your double standards in game and called you out on it Difference is i didnt hide my corp/alliance if anyone takes the ****, you do, you ashamed of your corp and alliance?
I know some Red Star guy ain't talking about spamming tanks. Could the pot be calling the kettle any blacker?
Have to say it 'bro', but your entire response to him was QQ.
L2Forum.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 21:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Big Popa Smurff wrote:ER-Bullitt wrote:OP is a typical protostomper, always has been. So are the guys he was probably running with. Anyone with half a brain who runs in s squad that spams proto suits should be able to deal with a bunch of militia tanks. derrrr
His opinion is skewed and does not paint a clear picture of the infantry versus tank imbalance. Especially if you look at the big picture from the new player, or non-proto stomper.
Forum warriors like Takashiro whatever from Red Star couldn't give two ***** about the new player experience.. they just happy rolling around in their OP tanks.
Good job douchebags. Yea I use proto gear, have since start of open beta. Iv played this game for more than a year and in that time iv amassed quite a fortune of isk. So I choose to use proto because I can afford to and why not? And yeah militia tanks are very easy. You can solo them. It's the more advanced tanks that need 2-3 forge gunners firing at once that are more of a challenge. Tanks are tough to beat but not impossible which is how it should be. You must be a complete noob if ur complaining that tanks are OP. The Butthurt really shines through your post.
So requiring 2-3 people to destroy 1 person is balanced? Seems legit.
Not saying that being tough to beat is a bad thing, it's actually a good thing. But when a single unit requires multiple unit's to destroy, there is a problem.
Call his post butthurt if you want. Doesn't make what's saying any less true.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:OP needs a flame suit
You used teamwork
You actually killed a tank let alone 11 of them
You didnt care that you went negative
You made ISK i assume
You are pleased with vehicles
You think CCP did a great job
You say Tanks vs AV is balanced
******* hell you have just broke every rule in the book and pissed off 99% of the forums let alone AV and infantry
I think you need a flame proof castle so you can at least live a few more years, that suit isnt strong enough
When I did half of stuff to tankers, a flame CONTINENT couldn't even save me. Let alone a castle.
Don't act so high and mighty when you aren't. It makes you look bad.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Big Popa Smurff wrote:
But that where the fun is. Coordinating with 2 other guys to take out a tank in a matter of seconds, getting a rush of adrenalin as u help to deal the final blows. Working as a team is a bit more satisfying than being a lone wolf.
So your saying that I should be able to simply buy an advantage by using a vehicle?
Man, that actually doesn't sound like a bad idea right about now.. Using gear that gives me the power of 3.
Why I'm sure that everyone had lots of fun when the Logistics class had the power of 3. Right?
1=1. Not 1=3.
Please. If you are going to pretend as if you speak for the Anti-Vehicle community, at least learn basic math skills.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3892
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
manboar thunder fist wrote:I hit a madrugar without its hardeners in the weak spot with a breach forge gun and it went down to 1400 HP in one shot. I just threw a couple av nades and laughed as he went negative isk.
Considering how your average Madrugar costs about 100k, I highly doubt that he went ISK Negative.
Heck, if he AFK'd for the entire match he still could have broke even.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3898
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Big Popa Smurff wrote:Atiim wrote:Big Popa Smurff wrote:
But that where the fun is. Coordinating with 2 other guys to take out a tank in a matter of seconds, getting a rush of adrenalin as u help to deal the final blows. Working as a team is a bit more satisfying than being a lone wolf.
So your saying that I should be able to simply buy an advantage by using a vehicle? Man, that actually doesn't sound like a bad idea right about now.. Using gear that gives me the power of 3. Why I'm sure that everyone had lots of fun when the Logistics class had the power of 3. Right? 1=1. Not 1=3. Please. If you are going to pretend as if you speak for the Anti-Vehicle community, at least learn basic math skills. im not speaking for the community, just my experiences. Im sorry if your finding it tough to play a team game, maybe you should go back to COD or something... do ur homework and realize where CCP has come from. EVE where it could take many ships to destroy one. you should really do your own math if you think one guy with a few hundred hp should realistically take on something with a few thousand.
You aren't speaking for the Anti-Vehicle community, yet you said this:
Big Popa Smurff wrote: .....from an AVer perspective.
Which implies that what you are saying is from the perspective of the typical Anti-Vehicle user; which would be generalizing and attempting to represent the community.
If I said, "From an American perspective, fast food is the best type of food," would you not agree that this statement implies that I am speaking for the general American population?
I have no problems playing a "team game" as long as ALL players are required to be part of the team. ~ Which tankers do not, nor have they ever. If you preach teamwork, then why not force all pieces of the puzzle to utilize it as opposed to one?
This game isn't EVE. You cannot expect every mechanic imported from a Space-craft Simulator MMO into a First Person Shooter and expect it to work.
Even if, a battle in EVE Online can be 1000 vs. 1000. You could have the numbers to allow this to be balanced because your team can afford to field extra people to deal with a target. DUST 514 features 16 vs. 16 battles at best.
If the person with a few hundred HP is wielding a weapon dealing a few thousand HP, then yes the one person should be able to take on the one person with a few thousand HP.
If you truly believe that a 1 person should not be able to take on 1 person simply because of HP values, then you would request a nerf to Shotguns and Nova Knives, as by your logic alone; Scouts/Light Frames should not be able to take on heavies in a 1v1 and win.
Here's a question for you:
Atiim wrote:Should I as a single unit have the ability to purchase item(s) that would require multiple people to destroy?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3902
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 02:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Big Popa Smurff wrote:Il just keep this short Atiim. You find it difficult to take out a tank, I dont. Simple answer... GET GOOD SCRUB. 
Oh noes, he told me to get gud. Whatever shall I do? 
Basically, you couldn't argue against me, so you resorted to an insult that's overused to the point of almost no meaning in the FPS genre? How sad. Even Spkr4TheDead and Tankahiro could do better.
To be fair, I didn't really expect much better from you. After all you don't even know basic addition.
If you find that taking out tanks are easy, then why not take KingBabar's challenge?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3914
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Big Popa Smurff wrote:
Just not arsed mate. I must of hit a nerve somewhere, can't understand why you want to have such a heated debate why I have fun with the game right now and you don't... I know it must be tough to comprehend someone else has a different opinion than you. Though you do sound a bit simple.
I could care less if you have a different opinion than me.
But when you try to sell you opinion as common fact, it becomes an issue.
Funny. You say I sound "a bit simple" as if you sound "a bit complex"
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3916
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:
Atiim is jelly bc he sucks at killing tanks and other people dont.
Then prove it.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|