| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lorhak Gannarsein
1269
   |
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was going to write an essay... But I changed my mind. Let the point stand for itself.
And for what it's worth, mentioning MLT HAVs in this context is equal to an instantaneous and irreversible loss of credibility. They're more effective than their price would attest, and everyone knows. They also invalidate to a great extent SP invested in vehicles.
Happily printing ISK with permahardeners and MLT blasters.
Just let me get a couple mil more before nerf, CCP!
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
411
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
I think MLT tanks can go tank themselves.
Don't look him in the eye, WHAT DID I JUST SAY?!!!
I specialize in ridiculousness.
Back off my Incubus.
|
Jade Dragonis
GRIM MARCH
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
274
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tanks are a pain at the moment and Ill admit i use them (SP invested) However leave them as they are. Once I get my Cal Sentinal with 4 dmg mods and the breach then they are welcome to spam tanks for my WP collection lol
Forged again? Your welcome.
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo
Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2288
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
No amount of boning relieves the urge to have a Tommy tank once in a while. 
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Vitharr Foebane
Living Like Larry Schwag
508
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Breaching fortified positions, scattering non av infantry like cockroaches, among many other things. No one is saying tanks shouldn't counter themselves they are saying that AV should be able to do it's job. Anti(as in kill maim or otherwise destroy) Vehicle(as in those things that aren't infantry) SHOULD be able to kill those foolish enough to stick around after the first shot. This isn't the case however as all tankers have to do is pop their god mode button and hunt down the poor soul who thought that AV is supposed to kill vehicles. THAT IS NOT RIGHT.
Thanks CCP for making the HMG Heavy viable again :3
That's no excuse to slack off on releasing a heavy laser though =.=
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
413
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
^This guy gets it.
Don't look him in the eye, WHAT DID I JUST SAY?!!!
I specialize in ridiculousness.
Back off my Incubus.
|
p q
THE BREAKFAST KILLERS
35
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
So, right now, this is a tank game on most maps. The only way to kill a tank is with a tank (unless a dumb tanker drives to yer turret). Is this the future of Dust? Tank combat? No thanks, I'll go back to my other games where a guy can't kill me for 25 cents |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3918
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:Breaching fortified positions, scattering non av infantry like cockroaches, among many other things. No one is saying tanks shouldn't counter themselves they are saying that AV should be able to do it's job. Anti(as in kill maim or otherwise destroy) Vehicle(as in those things that aren't infantry) SHOULD be able to kill those foolish enough to stick around after the first shot. This isn't the case however as all tankers have to do is pop their god mode button and hunt down the poor soul who thought that AV is supposed to kill vehicles. THAT IS NOT RIGHT.
Beat me to it.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service
RISE of LEGION
517
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:I was going to write an essay... But I changed my mind. Let the point stand for itself.
And for what it's worth, mentioning MLT HAVs in this context is equal to an instantaneous and irreversible loss of credibility. They're more effective than their price would attest, and everyone knows. They also invalidate to a great extent SP invested in vehicles.
But why need tank to be the best counter to infantry and dropships as well? If tanks can done nearly everything way better why have infantry and dropships in this game anymore? |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3918
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Why are niches the best counter to themselves?
And more importantly; why would I use AV if HAVs do it better?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
|
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1553
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
A railgun tank (and missile tank against armor tanks) should be the best counter to tanks, but AV should only be a slightly less counter, otherwise why use AV?
Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament.
Go Go Power Rangers!
|
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
1089
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:mentioning MLT HAVs in this context is equal to an instantaneous and irreversible loss of credibility.
asking what tanks are for and then throwing out such pathetic comment is equal to an instantaneous and irreversible loss of credibility. |
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
511
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
Perhaps have a hardener impose a penalty to speed while active? The point of a hardener is to let a vehicle stand and deliver through AV. So let's emphasize the Stand part of that statement.
There's lore for it already. Check out siege/triage modules on an eve wiki. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |