|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3777
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Title is self-explanatory.
Also:
Atiim wrote: Please attempt to remain constructive. You trolls should be sated by now.
-HAND
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3777
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:This would be the umpteenth whine thread by you about tanks. Yes, it really is always about tanks. Give it a rest. More whine threads are not going to make CCP fix things faster. There's a statue in Jita for that. It's not a whine thread at all. It's just asking a question.
Just me wanting to see people's opinion on the matter. And the thread isn't just referring to tanks either.
I'm not whining about anything here, so I guess that would bring me right back to where I was before you made your irrelevant comment that seems like a bad attempt at trolling.
Weren't you fed already?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3780
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:BuTtHuRtPEepZ wrote:should be this order
Vehicles > Infantry > Vehicles > Infantry > etc... Fixed that for you But where does that leave the AV infantry?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3780
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Text Grant wrote: You didn't hear? They are for the bottom of the leaderboards with 0 kills 0 war points and 15 deaths
Lol.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3780
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
TunRa wrote:Sometimes I fell Atiim is intentionally trying to start flame wars....hmm... I don't intentionally start Flame Wars.
They just usually become one whenever a vocal tanker enters the thread.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3780
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Kinda, Tanks whould be good at AV but poor at Anti infantry, wheras MAVs LAVs and DSes should be better v Infantry but slightly effective v Vehicles if properly fitted. Light Infantry AV needs to slightly be more effective. Heavy AV is pretty much fine atm. There's my opinions. Butt's system is pretty good at a basic level I just add a bit more
What more would you propose adding to Butt's system?; if you don't mind of course.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3782
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
TunRa wrote: But this is your what, tenth thread on this subject? Really? How many more will you make?
How many more threads will people make about Scouts being underpowered? How many more threads will people make about when a piece of content will be released? How many more threads will be about the changes to suit bonuses? Shall I go further?
Anyways, when every vehicle pilot on the DUST 514 Forum agrees to never make a thread involving Vehicles or Anti-Vehicle weaponry again, then I'll agree to never make a thread on the subject again.
Until then; "Deal With It."
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3787
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 12:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote: Well, the only Scout (I'm talking 1.8) that's underpowered is the Amarr one. Also, that piece of content should've probably came out a long time ago. Lastly, all you're doing is poor **** posting and bitchin to the wind.
And just because you said that, I'm going to make a post on how the pilot suit should work. Maybe. Probably.
Please, show me where I am complaining about tanks in this thread, or anything for that matter.
Anyone else have something utterly irrelevant that in no way possible contributes to the thread?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3787
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 12:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
Charlotte O'Dell wrote:shut up atiim. everybody and their mother already explained their feelings on the subject and you're just being a drama queen at this point. move on and qq about combat/rail rifles like the rest of us. Really? While AV vs. V has been discussed to death, I've seen about 1-2 comments total about whether or not vehicles should be their best counter. Please, link to a discussion where people talk about whether or not vehicles should be their best counter. For I see none
Also. could you possibly be any more of a hypocrite? Or do I need to link your post history from Uprising 1.6 and back?
You couldn't possibly QQ about anything involving a rifle, nor infantry; because your not good enough to do anything but sit in your tank (Your own words exactly).
If your going to spew mindless banter everywhere, could you at least be bothered to put weight behind it?
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
|
|
|