Lets laugh at the irony of this situation right now and get it out of our systems. Now lets start:

Blah blah blah ... yadda yadda yadda ... (lets throw some more horsedung and the community)

I know alot of what you said is warranted so I'll let that slide. Furthermore, the idea behind MHR is all I was trying to portray in this post, not the final product. As I stated in the OP, I don't care for taking credit, whether this will make people like me again, or if I get rich off it. I want 2-3 constellations set aside for noob corps that want in on PC, that's it.

Unless you're willing to contribute to this idea I suggest you refrain from posting. This is like looking at Hit-ler trying to stage a humanitarian operation to atone for his sins and telling him to stfu and stay a genocidal maniac. You guys are counter-productive in your own right. Mature the fuuck up.

Now that that's out of the way, can you explain what can be countered and how from what I've stated?

If you're talking about district locking I've already considered the possibility of double locking to counter the fix, and I've estimated that if an alliance were to try and lock up their districts, at least half would be left open within a day, while ALL of their districts could be "sniped" (as what the guys at DDB like to call attacking a district in the 30 second window before they have the chance to lock it). What this fix will accomplish will make district locking alot more obvious and impossible to do constantly, as well as to make sniping districts easier and less "wait an hour spamming x" time consuming.

With MHR, the KDR requirements are held for the purpose of the Battle Royale that will take play as soon as all of the corps that want to participate have districts in their designated division. If they prove to be too weak, or too strong for their division, MHR police would demote and promote corps accordingly, as well as set more accurate requirements for each division based on some consistencies and patterns in the skill level of each corp participating based on their division. Kinda like a survey, if you will.

You are fuucking ignorant. First of all, he doesn't give a single fix for district locking. One thing my post has better than his.

Second, the whole idea of MHR is based off of most of strong corps, MY ALLIANCE WAS SPECIFIED, in giving up districts and handing them off to smaller corps. If you read all of the important bits instead of skipping straight to the A-B-C division requirements like a e-peen stroking idiot that has no intention of giving a shiit about anything else, you would have realized that.

Ydubbs has a good idea, its good on paper. The same could be said about my idea. But my idea is a lot more realistic. Telling a corp capable of holding a quarter of Molden Heath they may only have 1 planet and never leave it defeats the whole purpose of "Planetary Conquest".

Seriously Arch, you JUST told me an idea that utterly destroys the Sandbox is a better idea than mine, now you think I don't know what a sandbox is?

A division space is the sandbox where big boys play.

B division space is the sandbox where the up and coming medium sized boys play.

While C division space is the sandbox for nooby small boys that want to fight other nooby small boys.

explain why its better. Give me 3 reasons that have nothing to do with insulting me and my alliance. go.

Let's stop with this pointless confrontation of Arirana's past vs his present, he's making an honest effort and it's for all to see.

But it's unrealistic at best. If you could get the entire AE leadership here with FA and NF saying they'd support this, then we'd have something to continue your idea with.