I like Top Men they're certainly not as condescending or totalitarian as some have suggested, we're going to get plenty of you unreliable ISK hungry people who will jump corps to get on whatever bandwagon. Top Men's a bit more EVE oriented but it doesn't mean that we can't fight we stay on PFC because PC isn't really a huge priority, sure getting training is about all we can do but these wars are jokes, we've got plenty of ISK (that we can't use). The thing is, is that we've got issues our US side isn't the greatest, or most active but we've shown up before our corps all have had districts.

I like Top Men they're certainly not as condescending or totalitarian as some have suggested, we're going to get plenty of you unreliable ISK hungry people who will jump corps to get on whatever bandwagon. Top Men's a bit more EVE oriented but it doesn't mean that we can't fight we stay on PFC because PC isn't really a huge priority, sure getting training is about all we can do but these wars are jokes, we've got plenty of ISK (that we can't use). The thing is, is that we've got issues our US side isn't the greatest, or most active but we've shown up before our corps all have had districts.

Wait a week or two.
This is the first time we've been at full clones
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/Oddelulf/III-District-11
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/Oddelulf/III-District-6
But the thing that all of you leet sons of bitches annoy me with is your not the type to make something do something, yall bandwagon, join a little guy I'd bet you couldn't do **** unless you pull talent from dying corps, you've never worked your way up you don't understand... http://dustboard.com/global/merc/HowDidThatTaste that's just me though...

HmmGǪme thinks your veiled condescending tone still doesn't mask the fact that your 'policies' are pretty 'cookie-cutter' when it boils down to it. If working with a top-down structure, a full charter of policy and operating procedures is what you want then good for you guys, if it works then carry on.

I highly doubt that players and corps switch allegiances in Dust all that much more than in Eve (shall we discuss TEST?) and that difference between the two can be accounted by the difference in mentality between a point-and-click space sim and a FPSGǪthat will never change.

Its funny to me how the corps/alliances that one can consider 'Eve born' have maintained this attitude of "when it matters"GǪhow did that work out for Subdreddit? Your statement of All For One And One For All is nice but holds no weight until you have been tested by bloody, bloody warGǪthat attitude/belief has never been executed better than by EoN when we were at our peak before too many players went on to much greener pastures than Dust will have for a long long time.

EoNBrosBestBros is an attitude I will always have but the time came when there was little reason for us to maintain EoN tagsGǪsomeone like Ydubbs will always have mad respect from me for being a stubborn bastard and keeping his alliance tag when there is no longer any reason to (in Dust/Eve).

Rules for rules sake is nothing more than a leadership circle-jerk that can easily isolate your line members. KISS and following a trickle-down mentality creates cohesion, dedication and functionality while not stomping out individual corp culture.

But thats me, to each their own.

Everyone runs their alliances differently I could trash talk about CI but I like Zatara and Co as well OSG, DBSA, and Gunfall

I try to keep quiet I don't mind laying trash out v EoN because I'm ex-EoN I respect CI and FA but I don't take kindly to TM bashing

Its funny to me how the corps/alliances that one can consider 'Eve born' have maintained this attitude of "when it matters"GǪhow did that work out for Subdreddit?

Let the dead be dead...

ALSO I agree with sheriff this ought to be in recruitment.