| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HYENAKILLER X
AGGRESSIVE TYPE
475
   |
Posted - 2014.01.16 09:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
But isnt it incredibly obvious that not only are vehicles op, and that av is nerfed, but also you are forcing a dynamic on players that absolutely no one likes?
Nobody likes av!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No one wants to use av if it makes you vulnerable to enemy infantry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
99% of the player base wants to fight on foot with rifles!!!!!!!!!!
Stop making it a vehicle game so scrubs can play.
At bare minimum make swarms a side are or super buff flaylock vs vehicles.
Why am I a hostage in a game I have ALWAYS BEEN GRATEFUL FOR AND ENJOYED?
I have the receipts to prove it.
Av is a problem. Please fix it.
You are welcome for my leadership
*Proven Aggressive Type
|
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
5783
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 09:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
So when AV was OP and AVers were forcing HAV and any and every vehicle off of the field with no effort required....that was a fair "forcing of a dynamic no on likes"?
For the most part however Vehicles need to change, AV needs its old damage models back and from there balancing can begin.
"My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity."
|
OliX PRZESMIEWCA
Bezimienni...
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
There are many ways to kill a tank. It's not impossible. Coordinate attack and someone to protect your back and most of them will burn.
Tanks need to stay. This game is a PS3 reply to Xbox Halo series. I can't imagine this game without vehicles but playing against 6 tanks is wrong. Ccp need to create some restrictions like max veh. amount per game. |
8213
0uter.Heaven
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1341
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:So when AV was OP and AVers were forcing HAV and any and every vehicle off of the field with no effort required....that was a fair "forcing of a dynamic no on likes"?
For the most part however Vehicles need to change, AV needs its old damage models back and from there balancing can begin.
1. When was AV ever OP? I was a skilled tanker, so AV never bothered me. AI redline rail turrets and double orbitals killed me more than AV. And I lost maybe one tank every 10 matches.
2. Having the tables turned is a cop out. We all want balance, not this back and forth -nerf buff nerf- system we always get from CCP because they have no formula or concept to balance
Fish in a bucket!
|
dust badger
SOUND Mercs
Of Sound Mind
376
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
HYENAKILLER X wrote:
Nobody likes av!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No one wants to use av if it makes you vulnerable to enemy infantry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
strongly disagree
There is nothing more satisfying than taking out a tank, and there are ways to make your self competitive and still carry AV
But i wouldnt say no to a little AV buff |
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
1415
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
To be fair, I've killed more tanks in the last month than I did during the time span of open beta's release to the last day of 1.6... |
jerrmy12 kahoalii
The Phoenix Federation
386
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:So when AV was OP and AVers were forcing HAV and any and every vehicle off of the field with no effort required....that was a fair "forcing of a dynamic no on likes"?
For the most part however Vehicles need to change, AV needs its old damage models back and from there balancing can begin.
Not swarms, but they do need a buff and vehiclr damage wp back
Closed beta vet
I use a tablet so beware of typos
|
Macchi00
LORD-BRITISH
38
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
I will say as opinion by Forgegunner.
Swarm, AVgrenade, Forgegun.
To be returned to its original spec.
The performance of the tank is good and remains now.
Plasma cannon should buff.
I love ForgeGun.
|
HYENAKILLER X
AGGRESSIVE TYPE
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Listen, you people can use this thread to show boat, argue or just for lolz but there is no way ANYONE can argue av without coordinated efforts is one of the most pointless endeavors. You are absolutely and entirely vulnerable when equipping av swarm or forge gun.
I respect the fact some of you guys go hard and like av. I fcking hate av.
Tank drivers and dropship pilots are cherry picking scrubs and im tired of not facing off against other opponents who I know I can beat but my entire fcking team is hiding from tanks.
Its just starting to be not worth it to log in.
all these proto stompers arent winning on anything other than fear of vehicles. this whole community is being trained to run from fights.
Isk and vehicles rule this game not combat.
You are welcome for my leadership
*Proven Aggressive Type
|
dust badger
SOUND Mercs
Of Sound Mind
376
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
ISK rules all |
|
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
2847
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 11:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
The current balance isn't forcing us into AV, it's forcing us into militia tanks.
I like playing AV.
No.
|
HYENAKILLER X
AGGRESSIVE TYPE
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 11:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
dust badger wrote:ISK rules all
Hinders all*
And 90% of the population isnt even experiencing the full game.
Vehicles behave like the best players and they are almost entirely scrubs every time.
You are welcome for my leadership
*Proven Aggressive Type
|
HYENAKILLER X
AGGRESSIVE TYPE
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 11:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:The current balance isn't forcing us into AV, it's forcing us into militia tanks.
I like playing AV.
If I wanted vehicle combat ide play armored core or twisted metal.
You are welcome for my leadership
*Proven Aggressive Type
|
Kierkegaard Soren
Forsaken Immortals
Top Men.
113
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 11:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
I like AV.
Because explosions.
Dedicated Commando.
So it's a good job KDR doesn't bother me, really.
|
KGB Sleep
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement
Caldari State
641
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 11:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
I want a wire guided missile that packs a punch but don't SCREW IT UP.
"Because beer, that's why."
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |