Biggest offender of the Railguns: Rate of Fire. They fire so damn fast and hit so damn hard at the same time, it's mental. Give them a longer fire interval, that will immediately make them less effective up close while they maintain their range and power.

Rock, meet paper. Large Railguns were designed to destroy Madrugars, and they destroy Madrugars, working as intended.

The CR seems fine to you though ???

Range , ROF , DPS and the ability like most AR's except the RR of instakilling any suit ( even Heavies ) without reloading a clip .

That just seems balanced to you ???

No its not, its a iwin button against every vehicle, it does more damage to shields, and ccp meant for it to be a longe range support weapon not a dps machine.

Its quite clearly meant to be the designated anti vehicle turret, as its anti infantry capabilities are quite limited. Also, it does more damage to armor, because it's a railgun.

I take it you use a Blaster? Those are Iwin buttons against infantry.

Biggest offender of the Railguns: Rate of Fire. They fire so damn fast and hit so damn hard at the same time, it's mental. Give them a longer fire interval, that will immediately make them less effective up close while they maintain their range and power.

This is about railguns, the large turret, not rail rifles.


Though Rails seem like they are doing what they are supposed to in vehicular combat. A maddie with a blaster can take down any infantry it comes across, but a mlt with a rail can pop it pretty fast in open combat.

Checks and balances seem halfway decent as far as having an easy 0 sp cost for people to call in to counter low skill tankers regardless of how much SP they have.

A good tanker has nothing to fear.

I apologize for that one but I still mean what I said . RR and CR are OP .

As far as the Railguns I just believe that most just need to understand that it's a force now . Before the gun use to overheat in the matter of three to four shots , now it can actually compete on the battlefield with blasters when before most of the time , there was no contest because blasters would ALWAYS win .

I apologize for the previous statement but I stand by what I said . Railguns now must be respected , this is the way that it should be , it's splash damage is still a joke and it is ONLY effective against tanks and vehicles , not so much against infantry like blasters . I like both , now the missiles on the other hand need to be looked at carefully , they shoot at everything other than what is targeted , the volleys fly in all directions and you have to be in close distance to hit a vehicle and against infantry it's totally ineffective .

Its quite clearly meant to be the designated anti vehicle turret, as its anti infantry capabilities are quite limited. Also, it does more damage to armor, because it's a railgun.

I take it you use a Blaster? Those are Iwin buttons against infantry.