|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aero Yassavi
Yassavi House
4443
   |
Posted - 2014.01.08 09:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Don't let your math overcome logic. Numbers can only tell you so much. So the scrambler rifle can dish out initial damage faster than the other rifles? But guess what? It can't sustain it's damage like the other rifles can. The scrambler rifle is balanced. If anything, it could use a little less hip fire accuracy, but that's it.
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
No, it's Super Amarr!
|
Aero Yassavi
Yassavi House
4446
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 09:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Aero Yassavi wrote:Don't let your math overcome logic. Numbers can only tell you so much. So the scrambler rifle can dish out initial damage faster than the other rifles? But guess what? It can't sustain it's damage like the other rifles can. The scrambler rifle is balanced. If anything, it could use a little less hip fire accuracy, but that's it. I did use logic: in 1v1 combat the scrambler rifle will win everytime, unless you're some kind of a morron.
Well either I'm a moron (only one "r"), or the Kaalakiota Rail Rifle, Boundless Combat Rifle, and Duvolle Assault Rifle are better than you give them credit for.
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
No, it's Super Amarr!
|
Aero Yassavi
Yassavi House
4447
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Aero Yassavi wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Aero Yassavi wrote:Don't let your math overcome logic. Numbers can only tell you so much. So the scrambler rifle can dish out initial damage faster than the other rifles? But guess what? It can't sustain it's damage like the other rifles can. The scrambler rifle is balanced. If anything, it could use a little less hip fire accuracy, but that's it. I did use logic: in 1v1 combat the scrambler rifle will win everytime, unless you're some kind of a morron. Well either I'm a moron (only one "r"), or the Kaalakiota Rail Rifle, Boundless Combat Rifle, and Duvolle Assault Rifle are better than you give them credit for. "only one "r"" Seriously, a clarical error, that's your retort? Lol. I'm going with moron.
If you really want to go there, when quoting inside a quote, you only use one tick. So it should of been, "only one 'r'"
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
No, it's Super Amarr!
|
|
|
| |
|