Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
3684
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 20:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Autocannons: Blasters with longer effective range, tighter spread, slightly less damage, stronger to armor, high RoF (both large and small)
Artillery: on the fence about honestly. I can't see how it's useful/immune to redline abuse in our current maps (way to small even for current rails if you ask me).
Laser: Most likely beam (long range, high alpha, low RoF etc) to fill in strong shield weapon in that class. Probably charge with long burst and overheat, low tracking speed.
Bomber dropships/Fighter Bombers: able to fit bomb launcher that fires one of four torpedoes (EM, explosive, plasma, "tank buster" (for lack of a better term)), max 1 torpedo carried at a time, 1-2min reload/ delay (starts when vehicle is called in and piloted to reduce recall abuse). LOS launched, no propulsion.
EM: large area "flux" damage (only shields/equipment, good for clearing large areas)
Explosive: tight area explosion, what you'd expect from a bomb, strong to armor
Plasma: Same as explosive, strong to shield
"Tank Buster": Very tight radius, best used against large stationary targets (*cough*redlinerailtanks*cough*), high damage
I'm sorry but tighter spreads for ACs?
I agree with you kn most points but I'm not seeing the logic behind that bit.
Also trust me when I say we don't need torpedoes in dust, just trust me on that one.....
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Zahle Undt
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
527
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 21:01:00 -
[32] - Quote
On a tangent (but better note). I want laser turrets even though I'm guessing they will be tough to use. But yeah I also want a thinly armored speed tank I imagine it would be like the US Bradley fighting vehicle .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Fighting_Vehicle
But I don't think I'm putting a single point of SP into tanks until I am roaming about in a gold colored amarr target sweeping laser beams across the battlefield melting infantry (for probably 30 seconds until a skilled tanker kills me)
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
3704
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 12:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
bump
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines
1954
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Autocannons: Blasters with longer effective range, tighter spread, slightly less damage, stronger to armor, high RoF (both large and small)
Artillery: on the fence about honestly. I can't see how it's useful/immune to redline abuse in our current maps (way to small even for current rails if you ask me).
Laser: Most likely beam (long range, high alpha, low RoF etc) to fill in strong shield weapon in that class. Probably charge with long burst and overheat, low tracking speed.
Bomber dropships/Fighter Bombers: able to fit bomb launcher that fires one of four torpedoes (EM, explosive, plasma, "tank buster" (for lack of a better term)), max 1 torpedo carried at a time, 1-2min reload/ delay (starts when vehicle is called in and piloted to reduce recall abuse). LOS launched, no propulsion.
EM: large area "flux" damage (only shields/equipment, good for clearing large areas)
Explosive: tight area explosion, what you'd expect from a bomb, strong to armor
Plasma: Same as explosive, strong to shield
"Tank Buster": Very tight radius, best used against large stationary targets (*cough*redlinerailtanks*cough*), high damage
I'm sorry but tighter spreads for ACs? I agree with you kn most points but I'm not seeing the logic behind that bit. Also trust me when I say we don't need torpedoes in dust, just trust me on that one.....
The range on the artillery could be short enough so it can't be redline abused but not too short. Iv played a few games where theres mortars and its fine.
It just has to have a targeting system like I stated further back in the thread so it can't be spammed and a minimum range of 50 metres. If the range is done right then it'd only be used in the redline when the teams redlined.
Like everything in dust, someone always finds a way to abuse everything almost lol and if done the way I mentioned then it'd still be rail tanks that people use to abuse the redline because it would be any good for redline abuse really.
If you think about it after the things I mentioned, its pretty obvious a rail tank would still be the one for redline scum.
Level 1 forum warrior.
Minmatar and Gallente fw.
I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines
1954
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
And speaking of redline abuse, anyone with half a brain will only come out of the redline with that bomber when hardeners are active.
That doesn't bother me though and its a great idea. People in dust generally try to abuse things as much as possible, iv accepted this and I don't think we should palm off ideas because of those people or we'll end up with nothing but nerfed versions of what we have now.
Level 1 forum warrior.
Minmatar and Gallente fw.
I sold my wife and kids to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |