u don't have a choice of increasing there price although i will be choosing one of the choices. :)

@ Stinker

* Breaking tanks involved tweaking dozens of variables.
* Can fixing tanks be accomplished by changing only one?

Not trolling. Your thoughts?

I don't think any of these options are the perfect fix.

shield tanks feel really good right now armor may be OP but I don't really know because I don't use it.

I feel that the blaster is too effective against infantry. lower the fire rate give it a higher direct damage and slightly larger splash. that way it is more effective against vehicles and installs but requires a greater accuracy to hit infantry. (it would still be "most effective" but it would be over all less effective).

make tanks more expensive, seriously just do it.

MLT tanks are a little too effective so a slight nerf is probably in order.

tank spam, tanks can't hack, so in objective based gametypes (skrim/dom) the team that tank spams often loses. base the payout more on a win or loss and people will stop spamming because it isn't profitable. in ambush I fully support a lower vehicle cap (not removing vehicle all together) I think limiting it to 2 tanks 3 LAVs and 2 dropships per team would be a fine and well balanced solution.

Making AV actually useful again like swarms and AV grenades would be a good start maybe. That's the main problem I see with it currently. Yes the low cost = excessive tank spam but if AV was actually effective like it was with proto swarms being able to one and two hit militia tanks that'd be the end of it. Then I'm sure we'd all hear more cries from the tanking community about nerfing AV cause "it just does way too much damage".