|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
31
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Warhammer 40000.
|
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Hyper space makes more sense than warp drive because hyper space is the act of using a worm hole to travel through space, but warp drive is just going faster than light. Technically speaking, going through a worm hole is more likely, at least in modern science. That isnt how warp drive works at all. That is a gross oversimplification. Also, wormholes are just as theoretical as warp drives. The only difference is, we can possibly make warp drives, but to use a wormhole, you have to find it.
celerity is the speed limit. Even if you could exploit entanglement the particles still only travel at speeds of C or less. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
low genius wrote:not one firefly comment in three pages?
Mercy is the mark of a great man. I guess I'm Just a good man. Well, I'm alright. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote: celerity is the speed limit. Even if you could exploit entanglement the particles still only travel at speeds of C or less.
What? No one was talking about entanglement were they?
Instantaneous transfer of information is the only exception to celerity, but speed doesn't apply in the same way. You don't have to get all huffy about your imaginary things. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Hyper space makes more sense than warp drive because hyper space is the act of using a worm hole to travel through space, but warp drive is just going faster than light. Technically speaking, going through a worm hole is more likely, at least in modern science. That isnt how warp drive works at all. That is a gross oversimplification. Also, wormholes are just as theoretical as warp drives. The only difference is, we can possibly make warp drives, but to use a wormhole, you have to find it. Yes warp drives are called warp drives because they "warp" time and space. You dont nescisarily "travel" fast but you manipulate space to cover greater distances in far less time. found this tidbit that you might find interesting. http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive
how is manipulating space time different than using a worm hole? |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote: celerity is the speed limit. Even if you could exploit entanglement the particles still only travel at speeds of C or less.
What? No one was talking about entanglement were they? Instantaneous transfer of information is the only exception to celerity, but speed doesn't apply in the same way. You don't have to get all huffy about your imaginary things. Who's getting huffy? I was just wondering because it just came out of nowhere talking about it.
there was a scientist studying cultures of bacteria he observed they would begin to act strange roughly 8minutes before a solar flare. Some of the particles in the water were entangled with particles in hydrogen atoms in the sun. The eight minutes was how long the light took to reach earth. The bacteria were affected instantaneously because of entanglement, however nothing traveled faster than light. Why? The particles were once part of the sun and traveled here at C or less at some time in the past. Traveling faster than light cannot be achieved. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote:
how is manipulating space time different than using a worm hole?
There are no wormholes in the tech of either series so what does it matter?
do you know what a worm hole is? |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Amarrgheddon wrote:Thurak1 wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Hyper space makes more sense than warp drive because hyper space is the act of using a worm hole to travel through space, but warp drive is just going faster than light. Technically speaking, going through a worm hole is more likely, at least in modern science. That isnt how warp drive works at all. That is a gross oversimplification. Also, wormholes are just as theoretical as warp drives. The only difference is, we can possibly make warp drives, but to use a wormhole, you have to find it. Yes warp drives are called warp drives because they "warp" time and space. You dont nescisarily "travel" fast but you manipulate space to cover greater distances in far less time. found this tidbit that you might find interesting. http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive how is manipulating space time different than using a worm hole?
altina, lets go back to where you did not answer this question, but asked your own. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote:Traveling faster than light cannot be achieved. Tachyons. Theoretical I know, I'm just pointing them out. Accelerating to the speed of light is impossible. But just so we're clear are you saying that both star wars and star trek use technology that is technically impossible as we currently understand the universe? Because you're right and I believe I said that already. Or are you saying the Alcubierre drive and its variants are impossible? Because at least on paper they should work and you would be wrong.
we could argue this, yet it would be speculation. One would have to know the margins of error, assumptions, and variables not considered.
I can write god created everything on a piece of paper and it can not be disproven. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 06:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:People.
When stating something as a fact such as "You cannot travel faster than the speed to light" please state your evidence, all material along with a report as to why it is what it is. Also please include documentation from your college/university in which you studied and gained your degree and knowledge, thanks.
sorry. Please refer to the standard model. |
|
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 07:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Look. I am not trying to ruffle feathers. I'm going to bed. The improbability matrix is my chosen fantasy for getting around space. |
Amarrgheddon
Warcaste
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 07:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote:Look. I am not trying to ruffle feathers. I'm going to bed. The improbability matrix is my chosen fantasy for getting around space. That requires a cup of luke warm tea right?
42.
I really am going to bed now. |
|
|
|