| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
72
   |
Posted - 2014.01.03 02:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
-would negate any damage done by vehicle turrets
-used by AV
-would take 150% more damage from all weapons (300% damage from head shots) but turrets
-could equip Swarms/FG/plasma cannon any future AV only |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 02:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Meee One wrote:-would negate any damage done by vehicle turrets
-used by AV
-would take 150% more damage from all weapons (300% damage from head shots) but turrets
-could equip Swarms/FG/plasma cannon any future AV only and nanos
-has skills to increase weapon damage by 250%
as far as armor and shields go, would it be like a heavy?
|
Emerald Bellerophon
Nenikekamen
62
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 05:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
We have high damage immunity suits in the game already.
They're called HAVs.
Except they're cheaper and require less SP. |
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1010
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 05:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Meee One wrote:-would negate any damage done by vehicle turrets
-used by AV
-would take 150% more damage from all weapons (300% damage from head shots) but turrets
-could equip Swarms/FG/plasma cannon any future AV only and nanos
-has skills to increase weapon damage by 250%
Oh geez, talk about unbalanced and immersion breaking.
What's the difference between an immobile Minmatar ship and a pile of garbage?
The pile of garbage is more lethal.
|
Timothy Reaper
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
Top Men.
703
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 06:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:Oh geez, talk about unbalanced and immersion breaking.
I'm beginning to think this guy is a troll, because he's been posting some of the most bass-ackwards ideas I've heard in a long time.
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Mark Twain
|
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1011
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 06:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Timothy Reaper wrote:Ulysses Knapse wrote:Oh geez, talk about unbalanced and immersion breaking. I'm beginning to think this guy is a troll, because he's been posting some of the most bass-ackwards ideas I've heard in a long time.
Oh, now that you mention it, he does come up with an inordinately large amount of bad ideas.
I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, though, and not all his ideas are terrible.
What's the difference between an immobile Minmatar ship and a pile of garbage?
The pile of garbage is more lethal.
|
Emerald Bellerophon
Nenikekamen
64
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 07:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:Timothy Reaper wrote:Ulysses Knapse wrote:Oh geez, talk about unbalanced and immersion breaking. I'm beginning to think this guy is a troll, because he's been posting some of the most bass-ackwards ideas I've heard in a long time. Oh, now that you mention it, he does come up with an inordinately large amount of bad ideas. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, though, and not all his ideas are terrible.
They're just unnecessary.
The pendulum has swung most of the way to the opposite direction, toward vehicles.
This suit would, by itself, be ridiculously OP, but I appreciate the message that this post gives, despite the fact that I disagree with the idea presented.
Vehicles are OP, in several ways. Infantry are likewise UP, in several ways. The devs would do very, very well to adjust this state of affairs back in favor of infantry at least somewhat, starting soon. |
Lorhak Gannarsein
1114
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 13:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Meee One wrote:-would negate any damage done by vehicle turrets
-used by AV
-would take 150% more damage from all weapons (300% damage from head shots) but turrets
-could equip Swarms/FG/plasma cannon any future AV only and nanos
-has skills to increase weapon damage by 250%
Would it ignore massive damage from snipers and ScR too?
Or would it just ignore vehicles because magic?
PRO tanker and proud.
Number of PRO-turret HAVs killed w/ my permahardened MLT Blaster Gunny - 1 (so far xD)
|
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
72
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 19:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tonka Legacy wrote:Meee One wrote:-would negate any damage done by vehicle turrets
-used by AV
-would take 150% more damage from all weapons (300% damage from head shots) but turrets
-could equip Swarms/FG/plasma cannon any future AV only and nanos
-has skills to increase weapon damage by 250% as far as armor and shields go, would it be like a heavy?
Instead of a regular commando being able to switch between two light weapons.
It would be a heavy commando able to switch between two heavy weapons,provided they specialise in AV. (no HMG,but FG compatible)
0 slots basic level(besides nanos), 1 high slot adv, 1 low and 1 high slot proto.
Would have enough pg/cpu at proto level to easily carry all proto eq/modules/weapons.
The suit could even be AMARR based as it would be a walking coffin against infantry,testing the users faith in their allies. |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
72
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 19:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:
1.Would it ignore massive damage from snipers and ScR too?
2.Or would it just ignore vehicles because magic?
It's nice to know you can't read.
1.All weapons but turrets would do 150% more damage (300% for headshots).
2.it can still be ran over,but it would use a kinetic neutralizer and if bullets of a certain mass hit the suit it would stop them cold.
But,as a cost the suit would be weaker to any bullets that were not equal to or greater than the mass threshold.
And as a suit dedicated to AV it would be installed with the most high tech protocols to push those weapons to their limits.
But it would have 0 protocols for any other type of weapon rendering it useless with anything but AV classified weaponry. |
|
|
Emerald Bellerophon
Nenikekamen
67
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 03:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Instead of coding a new, weird suit...
...the devs could just balance vehicles. |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
1467
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 03:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
4/10
Might read again. |
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe.
Public Disorder.
1177
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 09:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
Meee One wrote:
it would use a kinetic neutralizer and if bullets of a certain mass hit the suit it would stop them cold.
If it can stop high mass objects from penetrating the shield than why can't it stop small ones? The damage from turrets in this game is only marginally larger than some light weapons. Heck the forge gun does more damage per shot than a blaster turret. These smaller projectiles would, in effect, have a very similar kinetic profile to a larger caliber weapons (higher speed munitions?) making your background concept seem...stupid. Remember F=MA and all that.
This is a really bad idea. It would not increase either fun or immersion (something I think of as adding to the fun of a game) and could really be off putting for lots of people.
Fun > Realism
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |