|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2098
   |
Posted - 2014.01.02 17:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
A team of crack infantry - lolwanting AR to kill tanks are we?
Crack infantry which cannot adapt = crap infantry tbh
Crack infantry = You kill the enemy infantry and ignore the tank because he cant hack a point lol
No vehicle back up? whos fault is that?
If they bring 1 tank and 2 infantry, against a 6man squad with at least 1 proto swarm = Point held down because you kill infantry and tank cant hack a point
It sounds like your crack team is crap and ***** itself when a tank arrives
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2098
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 17:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:A team of crack infantry - lolwanting AR to kill tanks are we?
Crack infantry which cannot adapt = crap infantry tbh
Crack infantry = You kill the enemy infantry and ignore the tank because he cant hack a point lol
No vehicle back up? whos fault is that?
If they bring 1 tank and 2 infantry, against a 6man squad with at least 1 proto swarm = Point held down because you kill infantry and tank cant hack a point
It sounds like your crack team is crap and ***** itself when a tank arrives Oh my greatest apologies I hadn't considered we were to blame I mean its not like the tank killed us all or anything. We must clearly want to kill tanks with ARs because I mentioned that we were all running that did I? Its amazing, you seem to think we have the brain capacity of yourself. Said 6 man squad against tank = unequivocally dea, despite AV. You know its rather hard to defend a point when you are all dead. I mean its amazing I jist gave you a scenario where the current iteration of tanks gives you an 'I win' card and the best you can come up with is 'You trying to shoot it with AR's?' Its utterly astounding, I'll have to submit a paper on it, can I autopsy you? Im intregiued as to how thick that skull of yours must be.
Your all dead
Cant you use cover?
Sounds like bad team is bad tbh
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2098
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 18:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:A team of crack infantry - lolwanting AR to kill tanks are we?
Crack infantry which cannot adapt = crap infantry tbh
Crack infantry = You kill the enemy infantry and ignore the tank because he cant hack a point lol
No vehicle back up? whos fault is that?
If they bring 1 tank and 2 infantry, against a 6man squad with at least 1 proto swarm = Point held down because you kill infantry and tank cant hack a point
It sounds like your crack team is crap and ***** itself when a tank arrives Oh my greatest apologies I hadn't considered we were to blame I mean its not like the tank killed us all or anything. We must clearly want to kill tanks with ARs because I mentioned that we were all running that did I? Its amazing, you seem to think we have the brain capacity of yourself. Said 6 man squad against tank = unequivocally dea, despite AV. You know its rather hard to defend a point when you are all dead. I mean its amazing I jist gave you a scenario where the current iteration of tanks gives you an 'I win' card and the best you can come up with is 'You trying to shoot it with AR's?' Its utterly astounding, I'll have to submit a paper on it, can I autopsy you? Im intregiued as to how thick that skull of yours must be. Your all dead Cant you use cover? Sounds like bad team is bad tbh Hmm, I even went to the effort of telling you about the complex, It has a whole side open, What find odd though ia you seem to think hiding is an acceptable tactic. I think that just shows the tanker mindset. If I can see you and your not in a tank it should be instadeath.
You refuse to hide so you die
Frankly you can easy hold onto a point if no infantry are about and its the tank, you kill the infantry and afterwards hide
But sounds like you got a crap squad still with the mindset of 1 proto swarmer will kill all vehicles
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2151
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
But you're complaining that MLT gear is cheaper than PRO gear. You want a MLT hull to cost 200,000 ISK, and a STD hull to be 350,000 ISK?
I'll take that if your dropsuits go back up to their old costs. PRO suits costing 317,000 ISK.
No he is simply complaining that a militia HAV (expensive asset) is cheaper than a Proto Infantry weapon (cheap asset) Regarding the dropsuits price yes even a militia HAV should be more expensive than a proto dropsuits unless we get dropsuits that can have more than 5000HP, are immune to most Infantry weapons amd move faster than jeeps without stamina loss oh and that can carry a big gun with some small ones while beeing invincible for a short period of time.... You get quite a lot for the ISK you pay for a HAV... I disagree korvin, they should maintain their cheapness but loose their survivability. 1.7 has been good in the effect of more tanks, but if tanks (gunships, dropships, APCs) are too be a common sight (as they should be) they need to have less survivability, such that infantry and other vehicles can effectively combat each other. The frequency of tanks is only so high because, the tanks are overpowered. If they are balanced, less people will Spam them.
So give me a 5mil tank then
According to you cheap = useless and throwaway and can be easil;y replaced
So expenisve = usefull and durable and will kick everyones teeth in because its expensive
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2152
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
But you're complaining that MLT gear is cheaper than PRO gear. You want a MLT hull to cost 200,000 ISK, and a STD hull to be 350,000 ISK?
I'll take that if your dropsuits go back up to their old costs. PRO suits costing 317,000 ISK.
No he is simply complaining that a militia HAV (expensive asset) is cheaper than a Proto Infantry weapon (cheap asset) Regarding the dropsuits price yes even a militia HAV should be more expensive than a proto dropsuits unless we get dropsuits that can have more than 5000HP, are immune to most Infantry weapons amd move faster than jeeps without stamina loss oh and that can carry a big gun with some small ones while beeing invincible for a short period of time.... You get quite a lot for the ISK you pay for a HAV... I disagree korvin, they should maintain their cheapness but loose their survivability. 1.7 has been good in the effect of more tanks, but if tanks (gunships, dropships, APCs) are too be a common sight (as they should be) they need to have less survivability, such that infantry and other vehicles can effectively combat each other. The frequency of tanks is only so high because, the tanks are overpowered. If they are balanced, less people will Spam them. So give me a 5mil tank then According to you cheap = useless and throwaway and can be easil;y replaced So expenisve = usefull and durable and will kick everyones teeth in because its expensive Which is exactly why expensive tanks are unbalanced, if you make them expensive and powerful it becomes a game of who has the best. As it stands the Isk level allows for someone to die in a tank approximately twice a pub match for a miltia fit. Now if three people a side get through 2 tanks and 1 survives that will meam tanks become a constant threat. This is more fun than 2min scrap at the beginning followed by either ultimate pwnege from a single tank player, or no more tanks for the rest of the match. Ultra Strong tanks like you want are only fun for the driver.
A game of who has the best
With tanks its OP and unbalanced
With infantry its fine
Yea no
You cant have it both ways
At first its my AV fit is cheap and should be able to kill your super expenisve tank and now its my AV fits costs more than your tank and thats unfair
Intelligence is OP
|
|
|
| |
|