Good old AE, more assumptions from J3 and Bob spewing bullshit about how this is just for us.

STB and TSOLE are also very old and established corps. STB is the largest active playerbase in the game and TSOLE is the largest Aussie playerbase in the game.

This rule would protect fledglings like Grave, or cobra connection who don't have that playerbase to draw on from taxes. a 5% tax from a super active 30 man corp will only yield about a clone pack worth of isk. Supposing you turned off tons of players to PC by making them think PC is only an isk sink for no purpose...no hope for them. I'd rather more got involved.

FA can be exempt from this rule since AE's only legitimate concern seems to be pivoting on the fantasy that this idea is to advance the political dreams of FA. We beat you 2-3x since the New Year...so just chill you ******* nerd before you cream your pants again about being relevant in the competitive environment.

The problem of PFC is that instead of allowing people to discern what taking districts feels like and that that entails in PC logistically it prevents that crucial portion.

Allowing PFC to begin as a free for all would work as well, tbh.

Let them fight each other learning how difficult it is to take and hold 25 districts and forging the partnerships perhaps to take more than they could....interesting things happen. And then reset PFC after there's a winner of the free for all mayhem.

And Yes TP helped out a lot of corps stay on the map instead of simply taking everything...from the work that was done putting people on Altbrard to Sakulda to Skarkon and other places TP actually did quite a bit keeping corps who would have been reduced to nothing safe.

So yeah...go talk to 3dge of Darkness for example about the work TP did for corps tat wanted to be PC active [to name just 1].

Anyone else aside from AE pridehards around with an opinion?

It's simply an idea, and the closest criticism that held any water was that this shouldn't be carebear.

Does the community share the sentiment?

What we really need is for more districts to be opened up. Smaller corps will have space to take and I'm sure some corps will take tons of land but then you have a lot of timers. Honestly this would balance on it's own and smaller guys can get in there.

Zatara you have got it all wrong

When you become the power house of PC, then you get to make the rules

FA can be exempt from this rule since AE's only legitimate concern seems to be pivoting on the fantasy that this idea is to advance the political dreams of FA. We beat you 2-3x since the New Year...so just chill you ******* nerd before you cream your pants again about being relevant in the competitive environment.

FA can be exempt from this rule since AE's only legitimate concern seems to be pivoting on the fantasy that this idea is to advance the political dreams of FA. We beat you 2-3x since the New Year...so just chill you ******* nerd before you cream your pants again about being relevant in the competitive environment.

I don't disagree that opening up more districts would also solve the problem. Although, if they haven't made PC less laggy do you really think opening up more regions is a priority?

FEC wasn't exactly a failure not to turn this into something else just pointing out that because of the FEC a lot of players got to play with others in PC. People started getting on and playing Dust more and EoN fell apart right after. So to me seems there were some wins there as well. As far as this topic I will save my comments for later.