|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mortedeamor
1169
   |
Posted - 2014.01.02 11:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
im an ex closed beta tanker as far as blasters go i have above average skills im notta super great rail sniper have never been ..i have 1.2 mill sp dedicated to tanks and 36 to infantry. what makes me a tanker in dust 514 skill.
what skill comes down to for a blaster tank
knowledge of map
control of turret
driving abilities
self awareness
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1169
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 11:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
sp dedicated doesnt really matter in tanking i mean it can in competitive play vs specced tankers of equal or greater skill
but i live on the premise that if you are a shittier tanker than me with better gear i will destroy you..and that seem to pull through for me..until i move beyond mlt blasters i will have a specced tanker with me more often than not 
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1169
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 11:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote:What makes me a tanker?
I don't use a single piece of MLT modules on my tanks.
Basic & advanced.
well in that case what makes me a tanker is that i dont run double hardners..and beat non mlt tanks with mlt tanks..even though i has up to basic tanks
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1169
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 11:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
and by the by atim who cares what others think? people are always jabbing at u for what you claim to run..do they ever leave you alone? if your a tanker your a tanker whoop te doo hope to see ya on the field so i can roll into you and judge you.
until then if you ever see me i sincerely hope you at least try to kill me with your av(that i believe you claim to be great with as well)
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1177
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 18:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Amarrgheddon wrote:From what I read in this thread "good tankers" hate new tankers. It seems rather than teach them how to be decent, restrained, disciplined tankers such as them selves, they would rather have them nerfed. So if being a "good tanker" means whining and turning on others in your same profession. I will be happy to be called a part-timer. I do not want to be associated with such rabble anyway. When all tanks become nerfed you can blame tankers in general. It won't just happen to individuals. I think that is where the tank spam is coming from. If enough people abuse the current system it will be changed. I would encourage bringing more tanks onto the field. Keep fighting fire with fire until some one brings us some water.
damn im thirsty
i ide rather use they're lack of skill to fund the tanks i need for serious competition let them learn the way i did
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1181
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 00:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:Amarrgheddon wrote:From what I read in this thread "good tankers" hate new tankers. It seems rather than teach them how to be decent, restrained, disciplined tankers such as them selves, they would rather have them nerfed. So if being a "good tanker" means whining and turning on others in your same profession. I will be happy to be called a part-timer. I do not want to be associated with such rabble anyway. When all tanks become nerfed you can blame tankers in general. It won't just happen to individuals. I think that is where the tank spam is coming from. If enough people abuse the current system it will be changed. I would encourage bringing more tanks onto the field. Keep fighting fire with fire until some one brings us some water.
damn im thirsty i ide rather use they're lack of skill to fund the tanks i need for serious competition let them learn the way i did
also on this note i have taken down multiple proto rail tanks witha non hardened some in cqc..you snipers are so ballsy as to come close to me a cqc machine master i will slaughter you and av needs to hurry up and bring av in lavs with tanks..if they wanna stop me with out a skilled tanker with skilled tanker help (as no one tank hold me off
with tank skill matters most atm cept when it comes to rail sniping as for rail vs cqc blaster driving and person skill can make you a beast
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
Mortedeamor
1181
|
Posted - 2014.01.05 01:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
THUNDERGROOVE wrote:Atiim wrote:THUNDERGROOVE wrote:> 75% of your SP is invested in tanks and their related skills For example, on this character I have 0 SP in vehicles at all, therefore I'm not a tanker. My 10 mill SP alt that has all but ~350K in vehicles is a tanker, even though he mostly uses dropships because loljihadjeeps but I still have to deal with lolrails I would argue is. 75% SP  That's a bit much, don't you think? How about 50-65% Nope, if at least using a vehicle isn't your primary role you're not a tanker. There are exceptions like if you feel your vehicle skills are "maxed out" and you branch off, but that's a lot of SP.
my main is 98% specced into being a gaurdian..but sadly all the current avers are pussies and no one is working together like we did in chromsome this main has blaster tank specced to adv...thats not much but i am good enough with a blaster tank that most anyone except a proto tanker is easy meat for me...and proto tanks re batable with mlt tanks ive done it its epicly hard and if the tanker good i probably couldnt do it alone with a blaster.
tanks are great skill > than gear in all except long range rail sniping
av is sad because no one is using lavs hitting in groups they are alone and on foot and getting slaughtered
brothers since when was av clustered on foot? let the infantry hide in they're buildings until the av in they're covettes of doom and tank mates clean slate the whole map...
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
|
|
| |
|