|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
2
   |
Posted - 2013.12.31 16:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think tanks need roll down windows so that the can simply drive up, roll down, and enter their hacking pin into the station.
also a tag along meat wagon, like a lawn tractor that can vacum leaves off your lawn, but in game to be used for the bodies of the hundreds of av'ers that get mowned down daily.
|
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 16:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bunny Demon wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Limit the amount of each vehicle type not a single limit Eg 4 tanks 10 lavs 6 dropships
get rid of 3rd person views in vehicles (this is an fps), and the ability to hear anything but the vehicle when inside one. try these first. I do not tank myself, but know that MBT's are needed, I have AV prof, but it's useless becaause we have tanks to kill tanks and to kill lavs. AVing with only an SMG sucks! av should be my third weapon with a weight penalty...lol,,,ounces are pounds, and pounds are pain. |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 17:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Do you really believe it takes more than one AV infantry to take out modern RL tanks? Just on sidenote most real tanks have a crew of 3 to 4 men....so please don't come up with real life examples most HAV pilots would be quite upset if tanks w ere like our modern tanks....
modern M1A1 with a Bradley spoting can engage and kill a T-EIEIO's at 2 miles. |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 17:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sky Kage wrote:I agree with the OP, shut up already.
make me, slick |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 18:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jake Bloodworth wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Just so you know, politicians are the only reason we are continuing to build "modern" tanks in the US Army. Army leadership has tried to phase out tanks in favor of lighter, mobile platforms because a single GRENADE can take out an Abrams. Politicians want the gov funds to continuing building a platform that is simply unneeded on the modern battlefield.
Grenades,,ummm NO, 100 guys with RPG's not,, 20lbs of semtex or C4 thrown on and detonated NO! You would get "S.L.A.P'd" with coax M240 BRAVO only because the inline 50cal is non ROE for infantry! |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 18:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Go search up the Javelin on YouTube and get back to me on that.
why not indirect fire i.e. coperhead type or 155mm, you would need to laser designate target
|
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 18:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
BursegSardaukar wrote:Jake Bloodworth wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Just so you know, politicians are the only reason we are continuing to build "modern" tanks in the US Army. Army leadership has tried to phase out tanks in favor of lighter, mobile platforms because a single GRENADE can take out an Abrams. Politicians want the gov funds to continuing building a platform that is simply unneeded on the modern battlefield. I really get tired when debates rage on my comms (EVE and Dust side) about how weapons/war in Dust should be more realistic. If it was realistic we would be drone-striking 3rd world nations from the safety of orbit and wondering why they want to blow us up.
orbit's illegal since 1972 i think, so we do it from Langley and 12,000 ft, been to Ya'man or potholistan lately? |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 19:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Taurion Bruni wrote:GLOBAL RAGE wrote:Bunny Demon wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Limit the amount of each vehicle type not a single limit Eg 4 tanks 10 lavs 6 dropships get rid of 3rd person views in vehicles (this is an fps), and the ability to hear anything but the vehicle when inside one. try these first. I do not tank myself, but know that MBT's are needed, I have AV prof, but it's useless becaause we have tanks to kill tanks and to kill lavs. AVing with only an SMG sucks! av should be my third weapon with a weight penalty...lol,,,ounces are pounds, and pounds are pain. The 3rd person view is a must for dropships, you cannot change the angle of the turret in 1st person, so you have to be level with the enemy to kill them, and even then it is hard to do. imagine being only able to shoot straight in front of you with your infantry weapon, not easy
Agreed, you need a glass bottom on those flying death traps as well, vision sucks. let it be written and let it be so. |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 19:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:GLOBAL RAGE wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Akdhar Saif wrote:I think statwise they're inline with RL Tanks which can only really be taken out by other tanks or by alot of people with AV.
Having said that I think they need to increase the cost or limit vehicle amount in matches because more than 4 tanks on one side makes a boring match. Do you really believe it takes more than one AV infantry to take out modern RL tanks? Just on sidenote most real tanks have a crew of 3 to 4 men....so please don't come up with real life examples most HAV pilots would be quite upset if tanks w ere like our modern tanks.... modern M1A1 with a Bradley spoting can engage and kill a T-EIEIO's at 2 miles. Sure it can but a single RPG soldier can blow them up in one shot and Tanks are not that good vs infantry, most tanks engage othertanks and installations or IF the engage enemy infantry platoons they do it from great distances... Urban warfare is a nightmare for tanks especially without infantry support...
RPG's lol, only in bf3 and follywood, Dude you could with 50 of you're friends try, you may get a mobility kill, but the 4 guys inside will kill you and everyone of your friends.
just standing in front of the 120mm main gun when fired is 100% fatal and that is just the shock wave lifting you up off the ground a killing you!
and if you did get the kill, his platoon driving fresh shinny, would then lay waste to everything that moved.
i want really badass tanks, and you pointing out urban is foundational to CCP's map making problem. |
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 00:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
73 EASTING |
|
|
|
|
| |
|