|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
332
   |
Posted - 2014.01.01 02:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:If it's one tank then it should be one of every other vehicle as well . None should be looked upon as being more of an asset or important than any other if this is a fair game and you would like to measure out justice .
Um, no. Which vehicle is the most durable? How about the most deadly? Least likely to flip over? Only needs one person to drive and shoot effectively?
The only thing LAVs have over tanks is they're smaller targets that can get closer to objectives on some maps (since tanks are now almost as fast, if not FASTER than LAVs in some cases); and the only thing dropships have is getting on top of and over things since they can FLY. You put 2 or even 3 LAVs or dropships up against a single tank, and the tank is going to win 9/10 times, unless the pilot is a complete idiot, or it's a militia tank going up against assault dropships, and even then, it would be close. |
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
333
|
Posted - 2014.01.01 07:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:TheEnd762 wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:If it's one tank then it should be one of every other vehicle as well . None should be looked upon as being more of an asset or important than any other if this is a fair game and you would like to measure out justice . Um, no. Which vehicle is the most durable? How about the most deadly? Least likely to flip over? Only needs one person to drive and shoot effectively? The only thing LAVs have over tanks is they're smaller targets that can get closer to objectives on some maps (since tanks are now almost as fast, if not FASTER than LAVs in some cases); and the only thing dropships have is getting on top of and over things since they can FLY. You put 2 or even 3 LAVs or dropships up against a single tank, and the tank is going to win 9/10 times, unless the pilot is a complete idiot, or it's a militia tank going up against assault dropships, and even then, it would be close. Did you NOT get what I was getting at ???? I was speaking on behalf of tank users like I always do . It seems that you didn't understand what I said .
No, you were saying all vehicles should be considered equal, if and when it comes to vehicle limits. And I said, no, that's stupid, because tanks ARE a much more exploitable asset in battle, and therefor can NOT be counted as equal to LAVs or dropships. |
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
334
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 00:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:So YOU would like to go back in time as well ??? All I'm saying is when you read someone's words , like yours and the OP's for instance , you can tell that there is preferential treatment towards LAV's and Dropships . Just like it's been for a while now and now with this patch drop things have changed and like always , most are afraid of change .
I say again , no vehicle is no more important than any other . If you place restrictions on one than there should be restrictions on all .
Back in time? What are you talking about?
People aren't "afraid" of this change. They're pissed off because it's unbalanced. YOU are afraid of it being changed again, so that it IS balanced, because it means you won't get to freely zip around the battlefield in your invincible murder fortress anymore.
You can say no vehicle is more important than any other, but that doesn't change the fact that tanks are more deadly, durable, and exploited than any other vehicle.
Yes, there should be restrictions on ALL vehicles. Four LAVs, three dropships, two tanks. |
|
|
| |
|