|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1500
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 11:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
1. Join Our "Rainbow Office" chat channel.
2. Contact me and we'll Group up.
3. We'll play some EU ambush until we come up against a decent set of tank spammers.
4. Do Your "Easy AV" play you claim you can do.
5. I'll record it all and we'll deflate this myth that the only true effective Counter to tanks is more tanks.
Talk is cheap guys....
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 12:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:Fu+ēk it lets just set up a PC where they can prove the point. I pay for the dam clonepack my self
So 6-7 tankers and support infantry vs the kick as AV squad with infantry Babar you guys are the tankers on one of your districts if its okey with you.
My bet is on the tankers
It would be if we had any Districts left....
(With less than 20 active players and no corp wallet to speak of we sold out not bothering to fight a war vs Laggy Spam after they declared to me that they wanted to remove us from PC. We don't have the manpower, the isk or not least the will to fight a losing war vs the laggiest, richest and most exploit using corp in Dust. It would drain us for isk and probably the will to even play Dust.)
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 12:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:KingBabar wrote: With less than 20 active players and no corp wallet to speak of we sold out not bothering to fight a war vs Laggy Spam after they declared to me that they wanted to remove us from PC. We don't have the manpower, the isk or not least the will to fight a losing war vs the laggiest, richest and most exploit using corp in Dust. It would drain us for isk and probably the will to even play Dust.
OT We both know someone that would strongly disagree with you if he was still playing -
Who? I'm at a loss.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 12:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:I am looking 4 a home let me know if you are intressted
You need to have a min 3.5 KDR, 20 M + SP, a dedicated role and be at least slightly gay!
If you meet those criteria contact me or Tosh ingame and we'll do some matches.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1506
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote:so you want a tank driver to show you how easy it is to do the role of AV.
can't AV just learn to get better?
i really don't understand.
Well yes to the first, but only because they come here and claim it is so easy to kill tanks, its no problem for them doing it in basic gear with little to no infantry skills. Did you read the thread I linked? Claims like these pisses me off cause they're lying, and if they're not lying and everybody else simply suck, what would be better than to get "vid proof" posted by a non tanker on these forums? I will confirm their BS claim is true. And in the right sort of way, I can record a string of games getting the full picture of it, not some edited BS from someone having the occational tank kill.....
And please elaborate, how can AV-ers learn to get better?
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1506
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote:just played an ambush in which my team spammed the **** outta blaster tanks and were in no time at all thrashed by 1 railgun and 1 assault forgegunner, joining in on the fun i called in a mlt blaster tank and was then blown to hell in about 1 minute from 2 guys throwing AV nades and swarms , sooooooooo i guess it was because tanks are so *OP* that my team lost? seriously you people need to stop the crying just because your not slaying everything with a assault rifle
Yes, thats what happens every game, its mostly the tankers getting trashed by AV in no time. Perhaps give tanks some more HP or better hardeners then?
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1507
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote:KingBabar wrote:Wallaby1 wrote:just played an ambush in which my team spammed the **** outta blaster tanks and were in no time at all thrashed by 1 railgun and 1 assault forgegunner, joining in on the fun i called in a mlt blaster tank and was then blown to hell in about 1 minute from 2 guys throwing AV nades and swarms , sooooooooo i guess it was because tanks are so *OP* that my team lost? seriously you people need to stop the crying just because your not slaying everything with a assault rifle Yes, thats what happens every game, its mostly the tankers getting trashed by AV in no time. Perhaps give tanks some more HP or better hardeners then? perhaps stop complaining so mutch!? hearing people crying on the mic is OP to my ears!!
First off, I don't complain much at all. (And what is "OP to my ears"?)
I've not even commented upon the AV-Tank Balance other than in too many cases another tank is the only viable AV option, definately the best one.
The tankers claim its easy to do AV, even for them, I wan't them to show me cause I don't believe them for a second.
Its quite simple really.
(And please link my posts where I actually come on to these forums and complain. (Well With exception of my previous "nades should be nerfed" threads.))
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1507
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote:KingBabar wrote:BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote:so you want a tank driver to show you how easy it is to do the role of AV.
can't AV just learn to get better?
i really don't understand.
Well yes to the first, but only because they come here and claim it is so easy to kill tanks, its no problem for them doing it in basic gear with little to no infantry skills. Did you read the thread I linked? Claims like these pisses me off cause they're lying, and if they're not lying and everybody else simply suck, what would be better than to get "vid proof" posted by a non tanker on these forums? I will confirm their BS claim is true. And in the right sort of way, I can record a string of games getting the full picture of it, not some edited BS from someone having the occational tank kill..... And please elaborate, how can AV-ers learn to get better? really i kill tanks all the time and you want to know how. i speced into it. (AV) along with tanks. and yes i read it. REs and porxies work. Forge gun work and ambushes with multiple light AV work. Now tanks with constant hardeners require porcy traps with forges to hit after words or other light AV. Forge guns kill tanks in 3-4 shots no hards on which most do not have on all the time. Other light AV it is almost required to have more than one or else it doesn't do enough damage. IMO swarms do need a slight buff. along with the plasma cannon, but not so much as to make the forge seem pointless. as it is supposed to be heavy AV. AKA the strongest AV. but this game has still yet to add any webifiers or other equipment to **** off tankers yet.
So we have a winner, I take it you Accept my challange?
I'll be on probably in about 2 hours and the following 5-6 hours or even more.
I'd really like to se you perform your magic With anything but a camping fatsuit, perhaps I'll learn a thing or two....
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1507
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote:KingBabar wrote:Wallaby1 wrote:KingBabar wrote:Wallaby1 wrote:just played an ambush in which my team spammed the **** outta blaster tanks and were in no time at all thrashed by 1 railgun and 1 assault forgegunner, joining in on the fun i called in a mlt blaster tank and was then blown to hell in about 1 minute from 2 guys throwing AV nades and swarms , sooooooooo i guess it was because tanks are so *OP* that my team lost? seriously you people need to stop the crying just because your not slaying everything with a assault rifle Yes, thats what happens every game, its mostly the tankers getting trashed by AV in no time. Perhaps give tanks some more HP or better hardeners then? perhaps stop complaining so mutch!? hearing people crying on the mic is OP to my ears!! First off, I don't complain much at all. (And what is "OP to my ears"?) I've not even commented upon the AV-Tank Balance other than in too many cases another tank is the only viable AV option, definately the best one. The tankers claim its easy to do AV, even for them, I wan't them to show me cause I don't believe them for a second. Its quite simple really. (And please link my posts where I actually come on to these forums and complain. (Well With exception of my previous "nades should be nerfed" threads.)) OP (over powering) to my ears!! - there is way to mutch complaining in the forums im not referring to you personally . -i dont understand why people wont use a tank to combat enemy tank spam? mlt tanks are so cheap SO USE THEM TO KICK SOME ASS instead of complaning about how hard it is to fight tankers.
Right, then we are on the same page though with different opinions.
We both mean that the only proper counter to tanks is calling in your own tank.
You seem to think thats fine, I however do not.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1510
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush
Sorry i only play real modes
Ok, lets do it in whatever game mode you like best. Are you free tonight?
And LOL at "real modes", a bunch of morons running around in circles hacking and moving on is not any sort of proper game mode IMO.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1510
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 13:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote:
Right, then we are on the same page though with different opinions.
We both mean that the only proper counter to tanks is calling in your own tank.
You seem to think thats fine, I however do not.
Fair enough i agree av weapons need some reworking as the game has changed but i like the tanks.[/quote]
I too like the general workings of tanks now, the game is much faster paced and fun now, yes I honestly mean that.
The only real good ide I've heard is to remove large blasters, they're the reason its so hard to be infantry chasing Down a tank.
With removal of large blasters the tanks would be dependant on their smaller blasters and another dude(s) for being a mighty big hitter and have Close range anti personell capabilities at the same time. This just off the top of my head...
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1513
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 14:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:KingBabar wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush
Sorry i only play real modes Ok, lets do it in whatever game mode you like best. Are you free tonight? And LOL at "real modes", a bunch of morons running around in circles hacking and moving on is not any sort of proper game mode IMO. What where as whoever using FOTM fit with a modded controller in ambush is the real mans game right? lolno How would we do this? am i soloing these tanks or doing it in a group? are you even helping or just watching? Whats the plan?
Well you said it was easy, I simply want you to show me, I must clearly be doing it wrong. The form of it is not that important IMO.
- No forge roof camping. - I would prefer ambush cause there's where the truly tough games are, I mean, 6 enemy tanks and no place to hide very ofthen.We can do it in other modes too, not that important. - I will observe, you said it was easy so why do you need a group?Or my help? If you bring in 1 friend you can go 2 vs1 against the tanks, fair enough?
And I really hope that FOTM fit and Modded controller comment was directed at someone else, That couldn't be me you're talking about unless you're seriously deluded.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1513
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 14:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:KingBabar wrote:
You need to have a min 3.5 KDR, 20 M + SP, a dedicated role and be at least slightly gay!
No wonder you have less than 20 active players if you are so elitist! 20 M? Seriously? You're giving up a lot of fresh talents. PC active top corporations have people with much less than 20 M or so said good KDR. I'm absolutely shocked at those requirements. The only understandable one is to be a bit gay.
If this corp was truly intended for owning districts in PC I would agree with you. This is however a merc corp. And with 2 exceptions (1 super logi and 1 AV specialist) we're all experienced players with good gear and good to great gungame.
If people are to keep paying us 5 M per merc per battle +bonus I'd like to keep it so that our customers come again and again, filling the corp with "potentials" or "good enough" people, could lead to poor performance and us loosing business because of that.
I also have to actually like and know the dudes in my corp, see what happened to SI who recruited way too fast.
Dust is by far the easiest FPS game to do well in, by a mile. Even a semi blind scrub like me gets a moronic KDR....
A 2 KDR is a great score in any game, but not in Dust.
Besides, if you're paying good isk for a squad to help you out, wouldn't you want some sort of set standard? I mean, we all have our bad games but its not like a player with said recuirements are bad in general...
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1513
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 14:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:KingBabar wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:KingBabar wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush
Sorry i only play real modes Ok, lets do it in whatever game mode you like best. Are you free tonight? And LOL at "real modes", a bunch of morons running around in circles hacking and moving on is not any sort of proper game mode IMO. What where as whoever using FOTM fit with a modded controller in ambush is the real mans game right? lolno How would we do this? am i soloing these tanks or doing it in a group? are you even helping or just watching? Whats the plan? Well you said it was easy, I simply want you to show me, I must clearly be doing it wrong. The form of it is not that important IMO. - No forge roof camping. - I would prefer ambush cause there's where the truly tough games are, I mean, 6 enemy tanks and no place to hide very ofthen.We can do it in other modes too, not that important. - I will observe, you said it was easy so why do you need a group?Or my help? If you bring in 1 friend you can go 2 vs1 against the tanks, fair enough? And I really hope that FOTM fit and Modded controller comment was directed at someone else, That couldn't be me you're talking about unless you're seriously deluded. No FG camping lol Ambush hard lol thats because an AR doesnt kill a tank amiright? but frankly no ambush is very meh and tanks are in all modes anyways Why do i need a group? let see because its always easier to take something down in a group, thats called teamwork, a rare concept to AV users and one concept i use weather im in a tank or not
You go Av in ambush against a tank rain and lets see how hard it is....
I'm signing into dust right now. How many people do you need to demonstrate how easy AV play is? 5 would be max since I'm there too....
I'll be in "Rainbow anything" in 5 minutes, and I must say:
I'm impressed that you wanna take this challenge, didn't think that would happen....
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1513
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 15:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:KingBabar wrote:
You go Av in ambush against a tank rain and lets see how hard it is....
I'm signing into dust right now. How many people do you need to demonstrate how easy AV play is? 5 would be max since I'm there too....
I'll be in "Rainbow anything" in 5 minutes, and I must say:
I'm impressed that you wanna take this challenge, didn't think that would happen....
You keep saying ambush I dont do ambush i do proper modes OK then no ambush. I understand.
Its just way harder in ambush thats all.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1513
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 15:04:00 -
[16] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:KingBabar wrote:
If this corp was truly intended for owning districts in PC I would agree with you. This is however a merc corp. And with 2 exceptions (1 super logi and 1 AV specialist) we're all experienced players with good gear and good to great gungame.
If people are to keep paying us 5 M per merc per battle +bonus I'd like to keep it so that our customers come again and again, filling the corp with "potentials" or "good enough" people, could lead to poor performance and us loosing business because of that.
I also have to actually like and know the dudes in my corp, see what happened to SI who recruited way too fast.
Dust is by far the easiest FPS game to do well in, by a mile. Even a semi blind scrub like me gets a moronic KDR....
A 2 KDR is a great score in any game, but not in Dust.
Besides, if you're paying good isk for a squad to help you out, wouldn't you want some sort of set standard? I mean, we all have our bad games but its not like a player with said recuirements are bad in general...
Mmmh, so a group of very solid PC ringers? Ok, that makes sense. And I perfectly agree about the "you have to know the people", but stats are not a guarantee, in these terms. Anyway, I'm sure you know that there are awesome players with great gun game and less than 20 M. Would you really reject their applications?
No, that was a typo, its officially 15 M SP, but none of these numbers are set in stone, we have guys with lesser stats but they've gotten in after impressing me or others over several games.
Hit me up if you wanna do some games...
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1516
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 15:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:KingBabar wrote:
No, that was a typo, its officially 15 M SP, but none of these numbers are set in stone, we have guys with lesser stats but they've gotten in after impressing me or others over several games.
Hit me up if you wanna do some games...
I will. Is "Rainbow Office" your public chat?
Yes
Edit:
Scacci tells me you're Italian and very good, both of which will be very appreciated!
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1574
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
The challenge still stands.
Mua ha ha ha haa.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1577
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
For the record:
I haven't made up my mind about this entire tanks vs AV debacle. I do see tank after tank gets blown up (though mostly by other tanks), but I also see tank Squads ruling the Battlefield With entire Squads of AV players getting stomped....
Its as always a matter of situation, team composition and general skill of the players.
Having dudes thats hardly done anything but tank for almost 2 years come here and claim how easy av is, that they can drop a tank in standard gear without any skills invested is pure nonsense, especially the "easy" part of it all.
So far I can see 2 major issues thats off:
1. Tank spam in Ambush. Not that I play that game mode much these days but it is nice to have a Place where we can just screw around and shoot someone in the face, without worrying about much else. A co-ordinated tank Train is a sure winner and is about to break that entire game mode, its a shame.
2. The accuracy/efficiency of Large blasters. Yes we've always had them and no one complained, why? I don't have a Clue. Perhaps it would be best to remove it all together or do some tweaks to them, i dunno. IMO the large guns should be for other vehicles, installations, aerial vehicles and area denial, not the supersized AR, infantry killer it is today. With the removal of large blasters, tankers will off course get the occational infantry kill. Did you ever hear a ground pounder complain about getting killed by a rail or missile tank? I haven't.
If Heavy blasters would be removed, the tankers needs to fit their smaller turrets for Close infantri submission. This will lead to the tankers "suffering" from the same issue that AV infantry has, as an AVer you're pretty much dependant on guys to cover and take out enemy infantry or you'll not even get Close. To do everything you need more than 1 dude in the Box.
Today the tanks are:
- Very solid in terms of HP - Very solid in terms of keeping that hp With hardeners - Very solid in terms of repping time - Very solid vs anything not infantry - Very solid vs infantry - And they are fast to the point were it actually looks silly or "cartoonish" when you see them speed boost away...
Removing large blasters would give them a proper role on the Battlefield, not the "be all do all better than anything else" machines they are today. Does this sound balanced?
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1578
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:KingBabar wrote:
We both mean that the only proper counter to tanks is calling in your own tank.
You seem to think thats fine, I however do not.
Why is that wrong?
We need as much diversity as we can possible have IMO. If the only effective Counter towards tanks is more tanks, then we do indeed end up With tankspam 514, is that really what you want?
- See the red team Calls in a tank, we better do it too. - Red team goes: Se they're also calling in a tank, we better Call in another one in case that dude is good. Two more you say? Lets Call in 3 then..... Silly scenario but you get my point.
The traditional rock paper scissors that all games like this should strive for gets kind of broken if someone can have scissors made of rocks, it leaves the papers little Choice....
And seriously Spkr, you have played probably hundred of hours of MAG, where modes like Aquisition and Domination required more tactic than any Dust Skirmish I've played. Please tell me whats so tactical about killing all the enemies and keeping those letters blue? Its almost always a case of the team With the best killers winning the game, at least in my experience.
If most games hadn't ended up With me standing and fighting snipers at the redline I would definately play it more, its just that I've spent hours upon hours merely standing there waiting for the game to end cause its absolutely nothing to do short of getting a sniper and try and Countersnipe towards the redline.
If we had skirmish 1.0 or something similar that is progressive, or indeed any form of capture the flag game mode you wouldn't se me anywhere else.
And in regards to Ambush, the "I don't play that game mode" is hardly a valid point in a discussion now is it? Those/we are a part of this game too after all.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1582
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 12:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:KingBabar wrote:For the record:
I haven't made up my mind about this entire tanks vs AV debacle. I do see tank after tank gets blown up (though mostly by other tanks), but I also see tank Squads ruling the Battlefield With entire Squads of AV players getting stomped....
Its as always a matter of situation, team composition and general skill of the players.
Having dudes thats hardly done anything but tank for almost 2 years come here and claim how easy av is, that they can drop a tank in standard gear without any skills invested is pure nonsense, especially the "easy" part of it all.
So far I can see 2 major issues thats off:
1. Tank spam in Ambush. Not that I play that game mode much these days but it is nice to have a Place where we can just screw around and shoot someone in the face, without worrying about much else. A co-ordinated tank Train is a sure winner and is about to break that entire game mode, its a shame.
2. The accuracy/efficiency of Large blasters. Yes we've always had them and no one complained, why? I don't have a Clue. Perhaps it would be best to remove it all together or do some tweaks to them, i dunno. IMO the large guns should be for other vehicles, installations, aerial vehicles and area denial, not the supersized AR, infantry killer it is today. With the removal of large blasters, tankers will off course get the occational infantry kill. Did you ever hear a ground pounder complain about getting killed by a rail or missile tank? I haven't.
If Heavy blasters would be removed, the tankers needs to fit their smaller turrets for Close infantri submission. This will lead to the tankers "suffering" from the same issue that AV infantry has, as an AVer you're pretty much dependant on guys to cover and take out enemy infantry or you'll not even get Close. To do everything you need more than 1 dude in the Box.
Today the tanks are:
- Very solid in terms of HP - Very solid in terms of keeping that hp With hardeners - Very solid in terms of repping time - Very solid vs anything not infantry - Very solid vs infantry - And they are fast to the point were it actually looks silly or "cartoonish" when you see them speed boost away...
Removing large blasters would give them a proper role on the Battlefield, not the "be all do all better than anything else" machines they are today. Does this sound balanced? Stop complaining about pubs, pubs is pubs with crap matchmaking 1. lolambush, lolpubambush, lolmatchmaking and whoever spawns in 1st with the tanks win 2. No one complained ever, these turrets are anti infantry and can be anti tank also, 1.7 the right blaster can rip through a tank but its alot harder, this is an anti infantry weapon, a large AR for AR514 which this game still is If you remove large blasters because they kill infantry very well will you also call for the removal of forge guns because they kill vehicles very well So far we have infantry calling for the removal of the railgun turret and now the blaster turret so what we have left is just missiles and infantry will still cry about this turret if we keep killing infantry with it - Very solid in terms of HP - Only EHP, shield standard is 4k, armor is 5.2 and either tank with no hardeners is easy to kill - Very solid in terms of keeping that hp With hardeners - Its what hardeners are made for, they were made to reduce a portion of incoming damage, but no hardeners means it will lose that HP very quickly - Very solid in terms of repping time - Only when not being damaged, go over the damage threshold and the shield rep stops completely, armor is temp stopped - Very solid vs anything not infantry - Its what its made for - Very solid vs infantry - Depending on the fit its what its made for - And they are fast to the point were it actually looks silly or "cartoonish" when you see them speed boost away... - Current heavy tanks can reach upto 40MPH and prob more, this is the future where my tank has shields and less armor so less weight and can move faster and i dunno the hull is made of solid carbon fibre and is propelled by a augmented fusion reactor and with a overdrive injector installed can go even faster Removing blasters is just for infantry who get caught out in the open too much
All I see is:
PBI - get gud, use teamwork cause you need to do so to do any form of AV short of Jihad LAV.
I run a tank, and should be able to do it all short of hacking objectives, why should I Waste that PG/CPU and fill the smaller turrets With friends when I can manage alone and stomp anything alone?
Why should infantry be dependant on teamwork but the tankers should not?
And FFS, a real world argument? Really? ES, I didn't think you'd go that low. Well here's one for you: No tank today has a fast shooting anti-infantry gun as a priamry, that job is handled by the smaller guns on the tank, which it should on Yours too. This is not an argument I would ever bring up normally. (Yes there are some armored vehicles With a fast shooting 50 cal on the roof, not exactly the same as the giant blasters we have in Dust.)
And again, dismissing parts of the game cause you don't play it yourselves shows how selfish you really are.
And no, I wouldn't remove forge's, they normally need to be 2 to take Down any decent tanker, I would however increase the range of the smaller blasters so you don't get outranged by forges.
Edit:
I have yet to see any of you tankers man up and face my Challenge, talk is cheap....
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1582
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 13:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:unfortunatley i cannot do as u say on the u servers as vehicle spamm for american on eu servers causes the eu server players vehicles to teleport/...but once ccp fixes the lag issue sure
I'll gladly do it on US servers, I play on them all the time.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1583
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 13:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Why should i put small turrets on? i cant lock the doors, i cant kick players out who i dont want in my tank, i cant stop bluedots from getting in if one of my guys is out and hacking an objective - Give me the tools and may run small turrets again Tankers use teamwork, i use teamwork and work with other tanks/infantry, i find AV do not use teamwork and still think that a clip of a proto swarm will take care of everything Infantry use real world arguments such as a tank takes a crew of 4 to run it, the driver shouldnt have a gun, it only takes 1 rpg to kill a tank etc but double standards if i use it okay i got it loldismisisng parts of the game - Very solid in terms of HP - Only EHP, shield standard is 4k, armor is 5.2 and either tank with no hardeners is easy to kill - Very solid in terms of keeping that hp With hardeners - Its what hardeners are made for, they were made to reduce a portion of incoming damage, but no hardeners means it will lose that HP very quickly - Very solid in terms of repping time - Only when not being damaged, go over the damage threshold and the shield rep stops completely, armor is temp stopped - Very solid vs anything not infantry - Its what its made for - Very solid vs infantry - Depending on the fit its what its made for - And they are fast to the point were it actually looks silly or "cartoonish" when you see them speed boost away... - Current heavy tanks can reach upto 40MPH and prob more, this is the future where my tank has shields and less armor so less weight and can move faster and i dunno the hull is made of solid carbon fibre and is propelled by a augmented fusion reactor and with a overdrive injector installed can go even faster You mean you cant reply to it because im right Your challenge is doing AV in lolambush, then again how many times did AV say tanking was easy from 1.0 to 1.6? we even gave AV players a fully fitted top of the line tank and see if they could survive the whole game in it, only 1 person i know took the challenge on and lost the tank in 5mins so AV is also all talk while we are at it
1. Don't care what others have said or claimed earlier, lets focus on the situation at hand. 2. You and Jason are the ones claiming AV is easy, thats the real issue here, just taste it: "easy". And the danm list: - 4k is the lowest amount on a tank and still higher than anything short of installations, I Call that a lot, its a tank, not saying they have too much, just saying they have the most. - People run 3 hardeners and With a little smart play you can survive everything short of other tanks. - What is that treshold? I see tanks losing 5K hp and be back a very short time after fully charged, this is also ok. - And you claim that a tank should be effective against anything dependant on fit, ok. What then are the Counter to tanks other than more tanks? A wave of Av players? Mines everywhere An entire team focusing on those 5 tanks while the rest of the infantry goes unchecked? You have the best tankers you normally win the game, thats a fact. - Its very teasy to explain everything in a sci-fi universe, doesn't mean it doesn't look silly.
Individually I don't have any issues With any of the Things mention above, its the combinations of all of them that is a tad too much currently. Another sollutions would be to give the dropships more effective weapons vs tanks, now that would be balanced. Tank>AV - DS>Tank and AV>DS or something like that, you see rock paper scissors, now iits tank tank tank. I don't come here pretending I have the ansver, all I know is that the game is a little too tank oriented atm.
The Things we can agree on is the loocking of vehicles so you don't get a bunch of nubs in there, you cot my sympathy there.
Anyways, I'm fed up With you now, you're obviously biased and think more about your own preffered role and little of the general Balance of the game. And do mind, I'm not here to get any sort of super tank nerf going, its just a tad too much atm.
And I'm also getting bored by all this, weren't you the guy that sat on a mountaintop fir half a year redline sniping With a tank? I mean, the community even named that hill up after you, it says a little about you as a player and by extension how biased you are. Its perfectly Natural tfor you to sit way out of harms way and just rack in the kills. I do protostomp true, but its not like the dude standing 10 m from can't shoot back....
And again its all about Your and Jason's claim, saying AV is easy. Easy compared to what? If you'd go back on Your Words and said: "AV play is challanging and it should be, its a tank FFS sake, being hard to kill is what they're all about. Yes you need to be 2 AVers vs a single tank in most cases but that is to be expected".
No but you come here and claim that you're good and all the AVers are just **** players that can't play the game properly. Its a very high nose selfish and not least childish way of looking at it. And I wouldn't have bothered to make this thread in the first Place. And still neither of you will take me up on that Challenge, and until you do, my point still stands.
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
1587
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 00:23:00 -
[24] - Quote
@ ES
1. I acknowleged it, I didn't ignore it, I even sympatise. 2. Perhaps you do, I still see lots of tankers doing great without it. 3. ??? Not sure what you actually mean to say here, but my English is not that good, can you elaborate? 4. OK... 5. OK... 7. So the most powerful AV weapon beats it bach eh? 8. Then why won't you show me? 9. Right, how many AVers per tank averagely? 10. Granted, still looks silly, but you have to be outside of a tank to see it.... 11. Useful, but hard to impossible to use vs a skilled tanker 12. I don't spam nades, if you knew me you wouldn't make that claim. Cal Logi might have been FOTM way back in the days when I even didn't know what FOTM was. After the resent armor buff, the shield nerf and indeed the Cal Logi suit nerf its definately the weakest Logi suit currently. Seriously, a +5% per level to efficiency of regulators? Compared to hacking speed, armor reps and equipment PG/CPU saving? Its a versatile but pretty weak suit compared to the others. I never commentented about AV nades. 13. OK 14. I'll take your word for it. 15. Like all Dust players are mostly bad? I couldn't agree more. 16. I said I'm ok with whatever game mode you want, come on, read through the thread. Its just that the biggest challenge here lies in ambush and considering how "easy" it is, you really shouldn't have any problem.
Lets do it simple:
You'll agree that AV play is "challanging", not "easy" or man up and face my challenge, in Ambush (you just lost your other game mode privelege due to being a git) or you'll stay out of this thread, I'm done with all your "avoidance 514".
Be know as the dude that "talks the talk but are too scared to walk the walk".
And please do bring some laim avoidance as always, vaguely insulting and containing "LOL" in any form. I dare you. I f@cking double dare you!
(Damn, Forum QQ > actually playing. Its a shame... )
http://s1286.photobucket.com/user/KingBabar/media/BannerKingbabarcopy.png.html
|
|
|
|