| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FLAY LOCKED
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
17
   |
Posted - 2013.12.28 11:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Because so many people, including myself, have been using CRs and RRs, I wanted to dust off the old Duvolle to see how it compares. To my surprise, I actually did rather well with it, going 33/2 in a Domination match.
I prefer it over the Six Kin and Boundless CRs because of its higher ammo capacity and lower RoF. With the CRs, I find myself running out of ammo too fast. As for a comparison against the RRs, I don't know if it's just me, but the iron sights of the Duvolle feel more comfortable and any advantage the RRs are supposed to have in range seems nonexistent. I am able to take on opponents at 80m+ with ease while using my Duvolle.
The Duvolle AR is still a solid weapon. I am used to its sights and I think the RoF and ammo capacity are perfect. Do any of you feel the same? I know some nerf threads have been posted for the RR and CR, but in my opinion, they are not even nerf worthy at the moment.
The only time I'd agree with a nerf is if some TAR, Flaylock, or MD incident comes up again, but as for now, things feel right.
Oh yeah, tanks... Limit them to 3 per team please. I've played several Ambush matches where each team would call in 5 to 6 tanks, leaving infantry players to cower in cover or switch to ineffective AV. That is all. |
Oswald Rehnquist
961
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 11:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
I don't think things feel right, not that there is any battle rifle imbalance but I feel that the differences aren't that unique as it should, the far range rifle doesn't feel much different than the cqc one.
I think they should be pulled apart a little bit more and reinforce their range strengths and weaknesses of the rifles to make them contrast a little bit more.
Below 28 dB
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
Redline Defense Force
Seekers of the Unseen
138
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 11:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ill only use scoped ARs.
'Don't talk to strangers, shoot them.' Snow LOCKOUT
Think twice before you aim at me, you might already be dead.
|
Rowdy Railgunner
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
321
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 11:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6rHeD5x2tI Just because. |
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm.
Canis Eliminatus Operatives
398
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 13:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
I love my duvolle's, don't use it often but when I do what fun.
CEO
Invictus Maneo~ "I remain unvanquished"
|
Mortedeamor
1143
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 13:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Oswald Rehnquist wrote:I don't think things feel right, not that there is any battle rifle imbalance but I feel that the differences aren't that unique as it should, the far range rifle doesn't feel much different than the cqc one.
I think they should be pulled apart a little bit more and reinforce their range strengths and weaknesses of the rifles to make them contrast a little bit more.
Edit:
sorry if my grammar is failing me, its 4am and I was too tired to go to bed, fixing that now.
so u think the laser "rifle " is balanced?
i think people forget the laser "rifle" is supposed to be a rifle and not a shiny laser pointer
why use suits when ccp gave us nice shiny op as hell tanks that cost next to nothing
|
FLAY LOCKED
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.12.29 00:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:Oswald Rehnquist wrote:I don't think things feel right, not that there is any battle rifle imbalance but I feel that the differences aren't that unique as it should, the far range rifle doesn't feel much different than the cqc one.
I think they should be pulled apart a little bit more and reinforce their range strengths and weaknesses of the rifles to make them contrast a little bit more.
Edit:
sorry if my grammar is failing me, its 4am and I was too tired to go to bed, fixing that now. so u think the laser "rifle " is balanced? i think people forget the laser "rifle" is supposed to be a rifle and not a shiny laser pointer
I forgot the laser rifle even existed... |
KING CHECKMATE
Scions of Athra
3551
|
Posted - 2013.12.29 00:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
FLAY LOCKED wrote:Because so many people, including myself, have been using CRs and RRs, I wanted to dust off the old Duvolle to see how it compares. To my surprise, I actually did rather well with it, going 33/2 in a Domination match.
I prefer it over the Six Kin and Boundless CRs because of its higher ammo capacity and lower RoF. With the CRs, I find myself running out of ammo too fast. As for a comparison against the RRs, I don't know if it's just me, but the iron sights of the Duvolle feel more comfortable and any advantage the RRs are supposed to have in range seems nonexistent. I am able to take on opponents at 80m+ with ease while using my Duvolle.
The Duvolle AR is still a solid weapon. I am used to its sights and I think the RoF and ammo capacity are perfect. Do any of you feel the same? I know some nerf threads have been posted for the RR and CR, but in my opinion, they are not even nerf worthy at the moment.
The only time I'd agree with a nerf is if some TAR, Flaylock, or MD incident comes up again, but as for now, things feel right.
Oh yeah, tanks... Limit them to 3 per team please. I've played several Ambush matches where each team would call in 5 to 6 tanks, leaving infantry players to cower in cover or switch to ineffective AV. That is all.
The AR is still king at closer ranges, seems very balanced with the RR and the CR, the SCR being the most unbalanced (not OP) of all with High Alpha damage making it powerful in 1 v 1 situations,but overheat mechanic making it unworthy in any other case...
AV-TANK BALANCE = https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1612446#post1612446
|
HYENAKILLER X
AGGRESSIVE TYPE
444
|
Posted - 2013.12.29 00:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
The duvolle is just brutal in any situation. The laser was hard times for a while.
You are welcome for my leadership
*Proven Aggressive Type
|
Oswald Rehnquist
963
|
Posted - 2013.12.29 00:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:Oswald Rehnquist wrote:I don't think things feel right, not that there is any battle rifle imbalance but I feel that the differences aren't that unique as it should, the far range rifle doesn't feel much different than the cqc one.
I think they should be pulled apart a little bit more and reinforce their range strengths and weaknesses of the rifles to make them contrast a little bit more.
Edit:
sorry if my grammar is failing me, its 4am and I was too tired to go to bed, fixing that now. so u think the laser "rifle " is balanced? i think people forget the laser "rifle" is supposed to be a rifle and not a shiny laser pointer
I never made the statement that the laser rifle is balanced, as it stands the battle rifles are the premier form of combat dictated by CCP. That being the case finishing the battle rifles with greater contrast then gives it finality to balance the other weapons.
I don't use any of the battle rifles, I never said the laser rifle was balanced, or other other niche weapons. The discussion when people say rifles is in reference to the front line battle rifles, thus the topic was focused on that.
Below 28 dB
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |