|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5190
   |
Posted - 2013.12.22 18:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit.
That is all.
Lol okay we get tanks need an ISK increase, but why even bother having vehicles and roles in this game is they should all be as effective as one another?
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5193
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 22:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
DJINN Marauder wrote:RED FARM wrote: I guess I am the only one that thinks tanks are sort of not so bad. The problem is not HAVs. It is blueberries on foot trying to attack them and dying. Scouts trying to cross the road right in front of them etc. BBs poking out from cover ..."I wonder if the tank is still there?" If there are 4 enemies tanks on the field and maybe a LAV.... That is 4-8 less enemies foot soldiers able to attack or hold an objective(s). I know people will disagree. One person can hold an objective against 2 tanks. It boils down to DEFEAT usually by getting cloned and not losing your MCC. Stay in cover and do not engage. Two days ago, I held an objective outside of a city vs. two tank with 3 operators for like 5 minutes. I just danced around a box. Anytime one started to leave I popped a couple rounds into him to make him stay. If any tanker is 10 or more kills and 0 deaths..... squad leads need to target that tank and take him out them watch for a vehicle delivery and take him out again OR target him to completely avoid. So, in this regard I feel a 100k tank is (or should be) about as effective as a 100k suit. In reality the tank may or maybe not be force multiplier depending on the blueberries. Too bad I play ambush... No where to hide there and no objectives 
Ambush is the worst game mode and no tank should be balanced for Ambush the garbage game mode that it is.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5200
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 23:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:So it's okay for AV to cry about prices, but when my 1.7mil tank gets taken out by three Lai Dais, I need to htfu?
You know what? HTFU you terribad players. What crap ass tank are you running that dies to 3 Dai Lai's? Like seriously. Before 1.7, nearly everything died to Lai Dais. Like, seriously girlfriend.
Yup 3 was always enough to finish my tank from god only know what angle that I could even comprehend.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5202
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 00:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:So it's okay for AV to cry about prices, but when my 1.7mil tank gets taken out by three Lai Dais, I need to htfu?
You know what? HTFU you terribad players. What crap ass tank are you running that dies to 3 Dai Lai's? Like seriously. Before 1.7, nearly everything died to Lai Dais. Like, seriously girlfriend. Like OMG, don't be such a drama queen. Vehicles had issues with cost ans rendering but CCP went way too far with all the AV nerfs, like totally.
I cant take a man seriously if he says "Like Totally" in a sentence....you just crossed a line.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5205
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 00:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Swarm Launcher would be cool if the player had to guide their rockets to the target.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5207
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 01:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Goric Rumis wrote:Yes and no.
"No" in that nothing in the game should be balanced on ISK alone. Balancing the battlefield is more important than balancing the cost.
"Yes" in as much as effectiveness is measured overall, and not specifically by the ability to destroy it or its ability to kill. Its effectiveness needs to be limited to a specific realm. Right now, tanks are the most effective in all realms--they just need infantry to take care of the little stuff like hacking objectives. Their effectiveness needs to be limited by a redesign of the maps to limit their domain.
True in some regards but New Eden is based on a harsh reality.
You buy better stuff, you tend to win. Were not in some Starwars arcade defy all disbelief. In reality when you buy something of higher quality that someone else you tend to have better results from it.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
5220
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 07:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jadek Menaheim wrote:On principal alone, it makes sense to me that a body costs the same or relatively more than a vehicle to produce.
Really seems to me the body would be cheaper to make than a compact internal vehicle powerplant
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
|
|
| |
|