Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Leonid Tybalt
DIOS EX. General Tso's Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 16:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
This has happened to me twice now and I can hardly believe this effect is supposed to be deliberate. I sit in my madrugar gunning away, shield and armor are at full points and not forge guns, rail guns or anything of the like can kill me with several direct hits, yet somehow one dude ramming a bpo-LAV into my Madrugar is enough to blow up both my tank and his little jeep.
This never happened pre-1.7 (back then LAVs tended to always blow up if the even just nudged an HAV).
Seems kind of strange to me that a player wearing a militia-starter fit, calling in a completely free LAV is supposed to be able to destroy a tank that not even several proto-suited players can do.
So is this some kind of bug? |
alias lycan
Federated Consultants PMC Lokun Listamenn
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 20:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
sounds like you were hit with a jihad jeep. players strap remote explosives to their LAVs and ram you at full speed dealing enormous damage depending on how many explosives are attached. very effective way to quickly deal with a tank |
Leonid Tybalt
DIOS EX. General Tso's Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 20:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
But, shouldn't the kill report list the remote explosive as the weapon used to kill the tank then? Because each time this has happened it said "xxx (Baloch) Leonid Tybalt" or "xxx (Onikuma) Leonid Tybalt", indicating that it was the LAV itself that did the damage. |
alias lycan
Federated Consultants PMC Lokun Listamenn
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 20:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
the LAV explosion also deals damage sometimes its the remote that kills you sometimes its the LAV |
Dj grammer
Red Star. EoN.
68
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 01:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
The future of Anti-vehicle weaponry |
dogman dave
DUST University Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 03:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Leonid Tybalt wrote:This has happened to me twice now and I can hardly believe this effect is supposed to be deliberate. I sit in my madrugar gunning away, shield and armor are at full points and not forge guns, rail guns or anything of the like can kill me with several direct hits, yet somehow one dude ramming a bpo-LAV into my Madrugar is enough to blow up both my tank and his little jeep.
This never happened pre-1.7 (back then LAVs tended to always blow up if the even just nudged an HAV).
Seems kind of strange to me that a player wearing a militia-starter fit, calling in a completely free LAV is supposed to be able to destroy a tank that not even several proto-suited players can do.
So is this some kind of bug?
Not a bug, just an unintended consequence of making REs sticky, tanks OP, and AV useless. When CCP makes conventional AV capable of dealing with tanks in something like a sensible manner the tactic will die out. Meanwhile tankers will have to accept losses to suicide LAVs as the price to pay. While I fully support this tactic as an ingenious counter to tanks that are running wild I deplore the necessity of its use. IOWs CCP did their usual great job of rebalancing. I think tanks can stay as they are now and all AV weapons should have their nerfs undone. Lets try that and see how things go.
|
Xaviah Reaper
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
213
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 03:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
alias lycan wrote:sounds like you were hit with a jihad jeep. players strap remote explosives to their LAVs and ram you at full speed dealing enormous damage depending on how many explosives are attached. very effective way to quickly deal with a tank
also very freaking hilarious to watch :)
Best game with a Python:
33kills 1 death (1.6)
24kills 1 death (1.7)
|
Justicar Karnellia
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
303
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 13:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
dogman dave wrote:Leonid Tybalt wrote:This has happened to me twice now and I can hardly believe this effect is supposed to be deliberate. I sit in my madrugar gunning away, shield and armor are at full points and not forge guns, rail guns or anything of the like can kill me with several direct hits, yet somehow one dude ramming a bpo-LAV into my Madrugar is enough to blow up both my tank and his little jeep.
This never happened pre-1.7 (back then LAVs tended to always blow up if the even just nudged an HAV).
Seems kind of strange to me that a player wearing a militia-starter fit, calling in a completely free LAV is supposed to be able to destroy a tank that not even several proto-suited players can do.
So is this some kind of bug? Not a bug, just an unintended consequence of making REs sticky, tanks OP, and AV useless. When CCP makes conventional AV capable of dealing with tanks in something like a sensible manner the tactic will die out. Meanwhile tankers will have to accept losses to suicide LAVs as the price to pay. While I fully support this tactic as an ingenious counter to tanks that are running wild I deplore the necessity of its use. IOWs CCP did their usual great job of rebalancing. I think tanks can stay as they are now and all AV weapons should have their nerfs undone. Lets try that and see how things go.
I couldn't have summarised it better myself! This. |
843 Unorthadox Hunter
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
38
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 17:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
Though I doubt the tactic will die out when they have capable AV and even "Capable AV" will require two people to kill a tank.. wait it does actually take 2 people to kill a tank, some may say how but I won't say because the more time it takes people to learn how to use AV now the better with me and most likely a patch will cause RE's to stick on anything but vehicles do to these "Car Bombs" though AV people think about it, it is actually quite simple there are two phases you can kill a Tank that I have examined being a Tanker myself and a AT. AV are just angry that it takes more then one person to take out a Tank but there is also one phase to do this as well. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |