DUST Search - Future of BPOs?

All Channels

The Council's Chamber

Future of BPOs?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jaysyn Larrisen OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 537	Posted - 2013.12.20 20:57:00 - [1] - Quote CPM Team... Was curious if I can get your personal thoughts and what your percpetions are of CCPs future actions in regards to the remaining BPOs in the game. I've dropped a thread in the Feedback/Requests section that outlines a possible way ahead and would appreciate your thoughts. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=130765&find=unread
Necandi Brasil DUST BRASIL S.A Covert Intervention 579	Posted - 2013.12.24 02:29:00 - [2] - Quote Yep, Probably they will release new types of bpo's that requires materials to manufacture... Tanks 514! Cheap, fast, Indestrucbible and you see tankers telling it's balanced... Just makes you want to quit this BS
Jaysyn Larrisen OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 566	Posted - 2013.12.24 03:51:00 - [3] - Quote Necandi Brasil wrote: Yep, Probably they will release new types of bpo's that requires materials to manufacture... I think that would be a big step in the right direction.
Veka Kari The Phoenix Federation 27	Posted - 2014.01.04 07:02:00 - [4] - Quote Here's hoping this actually happens, because infinitely duplicating and never exhausting items causes a slow, cold, death for any game. Vote me for CPM1, A Conduit for change
Soraya Xel The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 876	Posted - 2014.01.04 08:02:00 - [5] - Quote Even EVE has a free ship. It just sucks. Free suits have to exist in some capacity, though perhaps not to the degree that DUST BPOs do. I guess forcing BPO play back to the starter fits would be the endgame, though those of us who invested heavily into BPOs would need to be compensated somehow. Indian giving doesn't work well for microtransaction games. As it is, CCP just took away three of my vehicle module BPOs last patch. I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 11552	Posted - 2014.01.04 22:08:00 - [6] - Quote I am at an impass on the entire subject. I really don't want them removed. However I don't want them providing items straight into combat without game play involved (ie you do something for it to make that item) however that distinction is going to be the most problematic to solve. Outside of the starter fits (which IMO needs to get reworked and updated with the new gear) Ultimately if time was pressing and the need of removal from combat came first I would have done to it as done to BPOs in eve that are no longer valid. 0 out the skill requirements making it invalid to fit until such time it can be used to manufacture by us or eve pilots. I am against removal of special BPOs from inventories (skinweaves, guristas, tribute suits ect ect) however regular militia modules that where purchasable in the market I would allow the removal of at a refund if it became necessary to remove the entire module line in the process. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Rail Turret =// Unlocked
Soraya Xel The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 883	Posted - 2014.01.04 22:16:00 - [7] - Quote I don't think manufacturable BPOs are really the same things we bought, really. They'd be completely different items. I kinda think it'd be okay to replace the BPOs if players were not given AUR back (we wanted the items, not the AUR), but a unique skin instead. If they make cosmetic items possible, those who have old BPOs should get unique ones, not purchasable by others. I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
Jaysyn Larrisen OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 673	Posted - 2014.01.05 01:13:00 - [8] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: I don't think manufacturable BPOs are really the same things we bought, really. They'd be completely different items. I kinda think it'd be okay to replace the BPOs if players were not given AUR back (we wanted the items, not the AUR), but a unique skin instead. If they make cosmetic items possible, those who have old BPOs should get unique ones, not purchasable by others. As far as the dropsuits go transforming them into vanity skins might be nice but doesn't solve what you do with other items. Additionally, I have feeling that would be a significantly more complex coding than just making them a non-equipable item that generates X amount of items per week.
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 6269	Posted - 2014.01.05 07:36:00 - [9] - Quote Honestly I feel that any current BPOs that we own right now should remain untouched. After all, there are no more entering circulation and their impact will probably not be noticeable. However, I wouldn't mind CCP introducing permanent BPOs like in Eve Online that require in-game materials to produce suits, weapons, modules, and vehicles. But these BPOs will need to be NPC seeded costing only ISK just like Eve Online and have a balanced bill of materials. For example: An SCR BPO would require 10 units of a planetary interaction (PI) material such as base metals, 10 units of reactive metals, 10 units of felsic magma, etc. with an available NPC factory to mass produce. To help reduce the bill of materials, BPO can be researched just like in Eve Online so that it's production time and material cost reduce. Faction standings should help as well. What do you guys think? OK, CCP. When are knives finally going to be improved? *CLOSED BETA VETERAN SINCE REPLICATION BUILD*
Soraya Xel The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 886	Posted - 2014.01.05 08:19:00 - [10] - Quote Honestly, adding manufacturing to DUST would be pretty complicated, and I'm not fond of it. Anything done for DUST manufacturing would be a poor copy of the complexity of EVE's system. I think that EVE players manufacturing suits and vehicles for DUSTies is one of the ways the link should progress in the future. DUSTies should be able to gather some of the materials through PvE, however, once that exists. I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate

Bear D'Grassi Forsaken Immortals Top Men. 18	Posted - 2014.01.05 12:40:00 - [11] - Quote There is already a well established manufacturing process in EVE, I don't see the point of introducing one to Dust too, we are mercenaries after all, our role in the manufacturing process should begin and end with our being paid to liberate infrastructure, materials or real estate for the use of our client.
Zion Shad Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 2113	Posted - 2014.01.11 06:36:00 - [12] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: Honestly, adding manufacturing to DUST would be pretty complicated, and I'm not fond of it. Anything done for DUST manufacturing would be a poor copy of the complexity of EVE's system. I think that EVE players manufacturing suits and vehicles for DUSTies is one of the ways the link should progress in the future. DUSTies should be able to gather some of the materials through PvE, however, once that exists. This right here. EVE Players get the BPO's and create the items is my vote Co-Owner of Multiplexgaming.com Co-Host of PODSIDE on iTunes


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.