|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1500
   |
Posted - 2013.12.16 19:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Atiim wrote:I'll join.
As both a real tanker and talented "AV"
Lol you're not a real tanker.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 08:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:I'll join.
As both a real tanker and talented "AV" Lol you're not a real tanker. 
If you need to take out other tanks with AV because you're not good enough to use your silly little tank, you're not a tanker. Like I've said, simply having access to it doesn't make you a tanker. Since 1.7, I'm a full-time tanker again. I don't even use ISK suits when I'm in a tank, because when I die, I die in my tank.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 08:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Atiim wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:I'll join.
As both a real tanker and talented "AV" Lol you're not a real tanker. Don't take it personally, he's just mad that people know he's doing well because of imbalance, not skill. He probably won't get over it.
Lol people were still complaining about me, and people like me when Uprising dropped, because we were just flat out more intelligent than infantry. It wasn't the vehicle that was OP, it was the driver than was OP, and the AV infantry that was extremely UP.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1505
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 11:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
because we were just flat out more intelligent than infantr.
a guy known for sending hatemails frequently and for generally posting biggest pile of shiat about tanks on the forums claims being intelligent
Then why do my tank threads routinely get over 10 pages?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1507
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 11:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sleepy Shadow wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
because we were just flat out more intelligent than infantr.
a guy known for sending hatemails frequently and for generally posting biggest pile of shiat about tanks on the forums claims being intelligent Then why do my tank threads routinely get over 10 pages? Trolls always get a lot of replies. ThatGÇÖs how you recognize a good troll. Blatant stupidity + ignorance x flames = replies en masse
If you say so.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1509
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Atiim wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Atiim wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Tanking in Ambush is for fairies.
Ambush within itself is for faries. Agreed. I notice a large percentage of the tank complaints centre around ambush. As such I tend to ignore them. If you don't want to get raped by tanks, play a game mode with a deployment and supply depots. Honestly i couldn't really care what it is, but if you say something is overpowered based on people using it in an Ambush match, then your opinion is not only idiotic, but irrelevant. Though I don't even get why somebody would want to tank in ambush to begin with. They are usually enclosed city maps where Scouts can easily place RE's on your hull, and when it's not a city map it's a wide open field where you don't have any Supply Depots, and somebody can easily call in a Railgun to wreck you.
But when CCP said they were using data based on tanks in ambush, infantry didn't say a word against it, that that would be a terrible idea and a terrible way to balance tanks for Uprising.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
| |
|