That was very silly, and not at all persuasive. It's jarring to be listening to someone talk about how balanced tanks are (along with all his reasons), while watching a video of him killing infantry with impunity. The infantry run around helplessly trying to get away -- because without changing suits (and you can't just change as soon as you see a tank), that's all you can do. The video sounded more like a tanker who is happy about how well things are going for him.

Also, who cares if you, Flix Keptick, will disregard someone's opinion because they don't watch some video you think is obligatory?

As someone else suggested to me, infantry should be for killing infantry and capping objectives. Tanks should be for killing vehicles and infrastructure. Infantry and tanks should not be able to easily kill each other -- they should have different roles. Maybe fill out the medium tier vehicles that are reasonable against infantry, and the tank role be to shut these down.

As it is, tanks are infantry slayers.

Exactly. Escalation! No more just run assaults around and end game.

Richness, layers, full war with the limitations we have which is to say we can't call in reinforcements of more players nor should we due to cloning. The players are the reinforcements. They escalate the battle from infantry to vehicle land war.

DO YOU NOT SEE THE LEVEL OF ACTIVITY IN THAT VIDEO! It looks like war. It looks like the promo videos for DUST!

You will finally have to move like infantry need to move instead of this damn ring around the roses bunny hopping merry go round movement. You will have to increase what you bring to the fight.

Proto infantry can still win matches; but, tanks can even the fight.