| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
   |
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Infamous Erich
Inf4m0us
103
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
i'm allways happy to share tears.
Closed Beta Vet
Shield Tank Vet
Bring back my Sagaris
|
BAM HUSQVARNA
Storm Wind Strikeforce
Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
Maybe you should go back to MAG where you were a below average Infantry scrub... |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
842
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks?
took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move. |
Asirius Medaius
753
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
If you are getting hit by swarms, it means you haven't run over the enemy team with your Soma.
If you aren't running over the enemy team with your Soma, then you neither fast, nor furious, enough to catch this Turbo Soma Driver.
I think if you break 20 kills without dying (my highest was 14 kills) in a Soma while running over infantry, you should be able to put a spoiler/wing on the back of your HAV.
#gottagofast
Signature coming soonGäó.
[Level 9 Forum Warrior]
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
681
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move.
Usually took me about 7.2s.
Guess you were doing it wrong?
Cosgar: You know, tanks are actually paper thin once their modules are in cooldown.
(Am too sleepy to quote properly)
|
Jason Pearson
3278
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? all the tank QQ just highlighted the bad tank players, that is all. it took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move. anyway, history will repeat, CCP will realise the mistake and the following nerfhammer hit will be so hard, you will be begging for 1.6 tanks afterwards. I will just watch the show and again collect all the tank driver tears.
**** off.
AVers can't adapt and were massively pandered to back before this build, they're unable to focus on anything other than "OMGTANKBOOMBOOMBOOM", it doesn't matter if it's a Shield tank or an Armor tank, ITS A TANK ITS A TANK!
I squad with players and listen to them, "Tank on the field", can you clarify what type it is? "Does it matter?" Yes "I don't know what it is but my swarms aren't killing it and it's flashing blue" So it's a shield tank and you're using explosive weaponry, just stop.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
4637
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yes, because rock to beat rock is totally fair.
I haven't lost a single tank today.
And I'm using cheapo Soma/Sica 's that cost around 70k.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Tuna > Tacos
|
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
1410
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
have a look at these I posted this in another thread but ill leave it here as well
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN58mesUkkY
2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUUVqD3ks40
3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKtYqWBR7h0
4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIwekfp3p5Q
now look closely at most of the ground based combat.... now combine what you've seen with the changes that ccp has applied to this game round vehicles its almost as if they are trying to tell us something ..........
with almost all the adds they have released showing a heavy vehicle presence and the changes to vehicles i.e. price ect its almost like they want lots of vehicles per battle supporting infantry ..
iv said this before but anyone who waches any add for this game and then comes on here getting but hurt from vehicles is just plain stupid tbh almost every add shows tanks , dropships and lavs running rampant on the fireld with infantry scatterd between. just pointing out some blaring obvious truths here
Its gone from suck .....to blow
level 1 forum warrior
|
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
846
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move. Usually took me about 7.2s. Guess you were doing it wrong?
yeah because playing in the acamedy against someone that bought a prefit tank for AUR with zero skills counts as argument 
Cat Merc wrote:Yes, because rock to beat rock is totally fair.
I haven't lost a single tank today.
And I'm using cheapo Soma/Sica 's that cost around 70k.
I guess it is time to start using rocks only
proto suit dies in 0.5s to any weapon, tank with 20k+ ehp that is cheaper than my suit requires coordinated team effort. CCP obviously never tested the changes. |
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
BAM HUSQVARNA wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Maybe you should go back to MAG where you were a below average Infantry scrub...
I was an all-arounder, which were better and more important.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
1164
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
And with yours are 12...
"Just another piece of duct tape"
Drugs for mercs
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? all the tank QQ just highlighted the bad tank players, that is all. it took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move.
That highlights just how bad you are.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
KGB Sleep
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement
Caldari State
493
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tanks are now simply dropsuits that take 3 or more specialists to kill.
I think it should take at least 2 to run a tank. Shermans in WWII ran a 5 man crew. BF3 needed 3 ppl in a tank for its max potential to be achieved. 1 person tanks are laughable. Teamwork should be required for that kind of force the same way tankers cry AV should be teamwork.
1 for driving / main gunning and 1 for module activation / gunning. Riding solo? Egg carton with no active modules.
It is balanced that way because for a tank to operate at max potential they get the drawback of less infantry fielded to interfere with counter efforts. How's that for risk/reward?
Besides, I can't think of anything more fun that a pro tanker picking up a random newbro and teaching him how run active modules then cruising the battlefield together. Wouldn't that be fun guys? We're all about fun in Dust! Build lasting relationships with your tank bluebuddies!
It would be as fun as getting a newbro to the supply depot to fit AV and then protect him all the way to your tank so we can destroy you while your whole team shoots at us!
The key is to lessen the number of infantry while a tank is fielded, or lessen the survivability of the tank and keep infantry roaming.
"Because beer, that's why."
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
KGB Sleep wrote:Tanks are now simply dropsuits that take 3 or more specialists to kill.
I think it should take at least 2 to run a tank. Shermans in WWII ran a 5 man crew. BF3 needed 3 ppl in a tank for its max potential to be achieved. 1 person tanks are laughable. Teamwork should be required for that kind of force the same way tankers cry AV should be teamwork.
1 for driving / main gunning and 1 for module activation / gunning. Riding solo? Egg carton with no active modules.
It is balanced that way because for a tank to operate at max potential they get the drawback of less infantry fielded to interfere with counter efforts. How's that for risk/reward?
Besides, I can't think of anything more fun that a pro tanker picking up a random newbro and teaching him how run active modules then cruising the battlefield together. Wouldn't that be fun guys? We're all about fun in Dust! Build lasting relationships with your tank bluebuddies!
It would be as fun as getting a newbro to the supply depot to fit AV and then protect him all the way to your tank so we can destroy you while your whole team shoots at us!
The key is to lessen the number of infantry while a tank is fielded, or lessen the survivability of the tank and keep infantry roaming.
My tanks don't have small turrets anymore. Bluedots are stupid and useless.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
760
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
KGB Sleep wrote:Tanks are now simply dropsuits that take 3 or more specialists to kill.
I think it should take at least 2 to run a tank. Shermans in WWII ran a 5 man crew. BF3 needed 3 ppl in a tank for its max potential to be achieved. 1 person tanks are laughable. Teamwork should be required for that kind of force the same way tankers cry AV should be teamwork.
1 for driving / main gunning and 1 for module activation / gunning. Riding solo? Egg carton with no active modules.
It is balanced that way because for a tank to operate at max potential they get the drawback of less infantry fielded to interfere with counter efforts. How's that for risk/reward?
Besides, I can't think of anything more fun that a pro tanker picking up a random newbro and teaching him how run active modules then cruising the battlefield together. Wouldn't that be fun guys? We're all about fun in Dust! Build lasting relationships with your tank bluebuddies!
It would be as fun as getting a newbro to the supply depot to fit AV and then protect him all the way to your tank so we can destroy you while your whole team shoots at us!
The key is to lessen the number of infantry while a tank is fielded, or lessen the survivability of the tank and keep infantry roaming.
I like your ideas. +1 |
Foley Jones
The Exemplars
Top Men.
309
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:02:00 -
[17] - Quote
11 tank threads on the first page?
Seems resonable to me....
MY SP BRINGS ALL THE MERCS TO THE CHANNEL AND THEY ARE LIKE "Do you wanna squad up?" DAMN RIGHT I WANNA SQUAD UP
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
2586
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:03:00 -
[18] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
Haven't heard any infantry saying this.
What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range.
No.
|
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1235
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mine is the one you should read and respond to first  |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range.
Called a lack of an advantage.
Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service
RISE of LEGION
323
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range. Called a lack of an advantage. Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes.
No crying tankers forced these changes and are now happy that they don't need to worry about anything except another tank or a LAV packed with remotes...well or a stupid team that allow the enemy to completly switch to AV. If you think a nearly indistructable warmachine makes any tank driver smarter.... |
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
851
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range. Called a lack of an advantage. Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes. No crying tankers forced these changes and are now happy that they don't need to worry about anything except another tank or a LAV packed with remotes...well or a stupid team that allow the enemy to completly switch to AV. If you think a nearly indistructable warmachine makes any tank driver smarter....
pretty much this. my tank is cheaper than my proto suit but alot more effective. I am invicible to infantry as long as I watch my cooldowns & get out before the modules run out.
the nerfhammer will hit tanks so hard, you will be begging for 1.6 |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1476
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 12:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range. Called a lack of an advantage. Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes. No crying tankers forced these changes and are now happy that they don't need to worry about anything except another tank or a LAV packed with remotes...well or a stupid team that allow the enemy to completly switch to AV. If you think a nearly indistructable warmachine makes any tank driver smarter....
You really think we wanted CCP to nerf our playstyle? Are you mad? What makes you think we want anything about our playstyle nerfed? Who was on here crying the most? Infantry. What were their complaints? Tankers are too intelligent and they can't be soloed.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service
RISE of LEGION
326
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range. Called a lack of an advantage. Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes. No crying tankers forced these changes and are now happy that they don't need to worry about anything except another tank or a LAV packed with remotes...well or a stupid team that allow the enemy to completly switch to AV. If you think a nearly indistructable warmachine makes any tank driver smarter.... You really think we wanted CCP to nerf our playstyle? Are you mad? What makes you think we want anything about our playstyle nerfed? Who was on here crying the most? Infantry. What were their complaints? Tankers are too intelligent and they can't be soloed.
Honestly did loose track both side were crying the same and this time CCP listened more to the tankers. I am not all against a change but CCP should know by now that their way of multiple big changes is not very helpfull...in terms of balance. |
Ryme Intrinseca
The Rainbow Effect
356
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? Haven't heard any infantry saying this. What I have heard, is guys with proto swarms not even being able to engage a tank thanks to their speed & the swarms' nerfed range. Called a lack of an advantage. Infantry forced these changes, and CCP obliged. It's only too bad that infantry doesn't like the changes. No crying tankers forced these changes and are now happy that they don't need to worry about anything except another tank or a LAV packed with remotes...well or a stupid team that allow the enemy to completly switch to AV. If you think a nearly indistructable warmachine makes any tank driver smarter.... You really think we wanted CCP to nerf our playstyle? Are you mad? What makes you think we want anything about our playstyle nerfed? Who was on here crying the most? Infantry. What were their complaints? Tankers are too intelligent and they can't be soloed.
You have a short memory, the forums were full of tanker QQ, much of it yours. 'AV is so OP, a can't Leeroy Jenkins the whole enemy team'. Well you can now, 'grats. |
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions
DARKSTAR ARMY
4069
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? all the tank QQ just highlighted the bad tank players, that is all. it took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move. anyway, history will repeat, CCP will realise the mistake and the following nerfhammer hit will be so hard, you will be begging for 1.6 tanks afterwards. I will just watch the show and again collect all the tank driver tears. **** off. AVers can't adapt and were massively pandered to back before this build, they're unable to focus on anything other than "OMGTANKBOOMBOOMBOOM", it doesn't matter if it's a Shield tank or an Armor tank, ITS A TANK ITS A TANK! I squad with players and listen to them, "Tank on the field", can you clarify what type it is? "Does it matter?" Yes "I don't know what it is but my swarms aren't killing it and it's flashing blue" So it's a shield tank and you're using explosive weaponry, just stop.
Why can't I held all this facepalm?
It's honestly painful to watch sometimes.
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
397
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
I like how pre 1.7 tankers complained saying that it should take more then a solo AVer to take out a tank since it costs so much.
Now that they are on par with dropsuit cost, it still should take more then one AV to solo a tank because they are a "tank".
Logic. |
NAV HIV
The Generals
General Tso's Alliance
595
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:40:00 -
[28] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining?
So you "The Great Tanker" lmfao.... Are saying that tanks at it's Current form are a good balance with between AV and Tanks?! The nerf on swarm and AVs, not a problem. There should be some team effort taking a tank down. But When i see a madrugar flying over an objective on domination. And I mean Fly Over the objective!!! That's when i have some issues. I dont care about tanks buff AV nerf, but the Gone in 60 second BS is just ********. IF you think it's a good fix then you are as ******** as i always thought you were |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1477
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? So you "The Great Tanker" lmfao.... Are saying that tanks at it's Current form are a good balance with between AV and Tanks?! The nerf on swarm and AVs, not a problem. There should be some team effort taking a tank down. But When i see a madrugar flying over an objective on domination. And I mean Fly Over the objective!!! That's when i have some issues. I dont care about tanks buff AV nerf, but the Gone in 60 second BS is just ********. IF you think it's a good fix then you are as ******** as i always thought you were
I barely see you, and when I do, you're infantry, never taking out a tank. Are you afraid?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
chase rowland
The Enclave Syndicate
Dark Taboo
112
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:As usual, infantry still complains that they can't solo tanks with their MLT Starter Fit.
Why don't you squad with a competent tanker and stop complaining? why dont you learn to play with 1.6 tanks? all the tank QQ just highlighted the bad tank players, that is all. it took 20-30 seconds with proto AV to kill a tank alone with continous fire and this only happened when the driver was bad and did not move. anyway, history will repeat, CCP will realise the mistake and the following nerfhammer hit will be so hard, you will be begging for 1.6 tanks afterwards. I will just watch the show and again collect all the tank driver tears.
then dusts population will be below 500. we were pissed enough in 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |