|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
417
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 22:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:No, its meant to repel them.
Tanks are supposed to be able to withstand the punishment to a degree. Hence the term tank.
If they could not perform their job, nobody would invest in the damn things.
And no, they are not balanced. They are better. Thats entirely the point.
If you want them to be more expensive, im sure that can be arranged. But they are performing at exactly the level they should. +ähm no AV is not meant to let the tank go and come back fully repaired its meant to be able to destroy tanks. Whats the point if only repell the tank for 20sec from the battlefield? Do you have any idea whatsoever how long 20 seconds is in a competitive match? 20 seconds is an eternity of free damage you are putting on the enemy MCC. Use AV weaponry on actual tanks in real life and you will come to understand how entirely worthless they actually are. They are an annoyance meant to deter state-of-the-art tanks, not kill them. Choppers and LAV's are about the only things that truly get destroyed by AV. Tanks are killed by tanks. The only reason games work differently is because a lot of people act like children when they arent capable of dealing with every single potential threat at the same time. It's the BS entitlement complex that comes with competitive gaming. Honestly, the REAL tank counter right now are assault dropships. Tanks cant do much of anything about those. But rather than do whats obvious, people would rather complain because its outside of their comfort zone.
That's funny. The FGM-148 Javelin stops tanks all the time with one shot. Kills the crew and detonates the ammo. That's one hell of an annoyance. That's how I want to annoy HAVs! LOL
Actually I don't. There's no challenge in that. But as it is now, any half decent pilot stands little chance of loosing his HAV even to organized infantry AV.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
420
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 09:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:The US military does not like our armor to get chinked. Scratches the paint job and annoys us. If the RPG threat was truly high to tanks, there would be some evidence of it in actual combat huh? The javelin works on the tanks of other nations because... uh.... who have we been fighting for the last thirty years? Not exactly the space-age enemy we were preparing for.
You obviously don't know how the Javelin works. But now that I've said that you'll probably go look it up and post what you find here to try and look like you knew before you were called on your misconception.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
420
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 09:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tanks? What tanks?
Read my signature.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
420
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 09:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sir Petersen wrote:Are there people out there who think the tanks are not OP? lol how is it possible to be so blind? Or is it ignorance that prevents some of you to see the obvious?
Well they see it, but those who prefer easy kills with little to no risk will deny their now overwhelming advantage.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
420
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 10:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vesperz wrote:Ahem. Just destroyed two tanks yesterday using nothing but sticky RE's. Snuck up behind while it was busy shooting my team mates. Big explosions and kill points while running away giggling. Number two? Dropped atop of a tank and stuck RE's once again, again explosions and kill points. ... I run scout. Fun times were had. Just thought I'd share.
Well done. o7
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
422
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 10:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:GET ATMESON wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank pointless. The problem isn't the tank being OP. The problem is you being overly entitled.
Is the only true counter to a tank another tank? Yes. It is. And thats exactly how it should be. At least until other big vehicles come into play.
New Eden is a place dominated by large, powerful vehicles. It always has been. Anti-vehicle stuff is merely there to annoy them and force them to retreat. Don't like it? Too bad. Tooooo bad.
Sincerely,
A FORGE GUNNER who actually appreciates fun gameplay when he notices it. Tanks prices are way cheaper..... Still meant to wreck you. AV is meant to wreck tanks, your point is null and void. Why should AV solo a force multiplier?
Your siganture "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry." is blatantly false as HAVs have never required teamwork to be effective.
But to put it simply, again, since it's apparently a difficult concept for many vehicle pilots to comprehend...
AV equals Anti-Vehicle. It does not mean Annoy-Vehicle.
Probably still too difficult for you.
Try this...
When operating an HAV takes three pilots with SP spent on HAV operation to make it do anything, then you can come back with the argument that it should require three AV to take it down. Until then your inability to comprehend GAME balance issues as related to that particular play style is noted and filed.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
422
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 10:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vesperz wrote:Shijima Kuraimaru wrote:Vesperz wrote:Ahem. Just destroyed two tanks yesterday using nothing but sticky RE's. Snuck up behind while it was busy shooting my team mates. Big explosions and kill points while running away giggling. Number two? Dropped atop of a tank and stuck RE's once again, again explosions and kill points. ... I run scout. Fun times were had. Just thought I'd share. Well done. o7 o7 Thank you sir. It wasn't easy let me tall ya' I don't run tanks at all, but I mean if myself, in a scout suit can take down a tank MGS Solid Snake style - Hmmm, what does that say to the complainers about tanks being OP?
Like I said, well done, but you have the SP invested in the gear to make the tactic work. Not everyone who wants to be AV want's to play it the same way you do and they shouldn't have to.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
422
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 10:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
dogmanpig wrote:Shijima Kuraimaru wrote:
Your siganture "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry." is blatantly false as HAVs have never required teamwork to be effective.
when vehicles can capture objectives, go in doors, and give themselfs ammo without going to a depot or calling a new one in then they won't require teamwork, till then they do require teamwork.
You poor deluded soul.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
Shijima Kuraimaru
warravens League of Infamy
430
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 11:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote:Here's how balanced tank v AV is. I ran a match earlier today where my squad and I killed 7 tanks (2 somas, 3 Sicas, 1 Gunloggi and 1 Madrugar) and 1 LAV with swarms, proxy mines, RE's and AV grenades. All of the tankers were no-name scrubs I had never heard of who just had basic skills into tanks and were terrible at running them. I went 13/6, loosing all but two of my fits to infantry. My AV fit costs 58,600ish per suit. That adds up to about 351,600 ISK for chasing down skilless scrubs in tanks because I can't AV and shoot enemies behind me at the same time. You COULD try to clear out the infanrty first, but the tank will have moved on or killed you from behind by then. I earned about 176,000 ISK for running AV all match and getting trounced by infantry while trying to focus on killing off the constant vehicle spam.
So, some scrubs can fit basic tanks worth around 100,000-200,000 ISK and go 18/2 or 28/1 without hardly spending any SP into tanks (actual scores of two of the tankers from the match, there were 5 different ones on the field at all times) and probably earn close to twice what I do while I'm specced to Prof. 5 in swarms and running 3 damage mods on a Wyrikomi, and earn a "consolation prize" sized reward of around half what they probably made while I wasted twice what they did in a match hunting them down.
So, where's your risk v reward buddy? I'm looking for it, but I sure as hell don't see it. Quit scrubba dubbin and get good, it doesn't take OP tanks to run tanks well. Ask Tech Mech or Lurchasaurus or Skihides or any of the other actually GOOD tankers in the game. They pulled off awesome matches without BS tank speeds and stacked hardners that negate almost all damage.
The current damage out put for the current proto swarms needs to be the new basic swarm damage, and swarm missiles need a huge speed buff. AV grenade damage of Lai Dai's needs to be the basic AV grenade damage, and forge guns.... well... they are actually in a good place right now since they have both range, damage AND anti-infantry capabilities. Though since you RUN forge's, I guess I can't expect you to understand the plight of the rest of the AV players.
Edit: No offense to reasonable forge gunners
Well I think of it this way...
If Forges aren't very effective now, then that implies that other lighter AV are worse off. It's really not a hard connection to make and you have my sympathies for not being able to make it without it being spelled out and thinking I was trying to downplay other AV.
I still can't find tanks on the market. All I see are those HAVs.
|
|
|
|