| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vitharr Foebane
Blood Money Mercenaries
352
   |
Posted - 2013.12.12 06:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Add at least a zero maybe two to the cost of any thing vehicle related, because at the moment they are way too good for way too cheap.
TBA IS NOT A NAME!
At least give the heavy laser a name so we know you MIGHT be working on it.
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2147
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 06:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is exactly what infantry said when they made turrets cost over 1 million isk. We just fixed that.
"He shouldve realized at that point I was lying as I'd already had my morning poo and I don't read newspapers."
CB Vet
|
bear90211
Nyain San
Renegade Alliance
70
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 06:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:Add at least a zero maybe two to the cost of any thing vehicle related, because at the moment they are way too good for way too cheap.
Ok so you want to SUPAH NURF HAMMAH us AGAIN for the 7th TIME! and now you want us to be a 2 hit kill to an STD swarm launcher and us to cost 900000 ISK just for the base, so a proto tank will cost... 5.2 million ISk. THINK ABOUT IT. ITS A TANK.
Heavies are still squishy to my AR, just 5 rounds into them extra ;D
hmm, I want taco's...
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
1346
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 06:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:This is exactly what infantry said when they made turrets cost over 1 million isk. We just fixed that.
Strong or cheap. Pick one, Lurch. The current HAVs cost less than Protosuits, so if that's the case than we should, by all rights, make them die to a single ProtoSwarmLauncher. After all, you paid less than he did...
Shields as Weapons
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
1032
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 10:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vehicles need to go back to pre 1.7.
The whole point of a vehicle was that it was expensive but super effective. They weren't used willy-nilly.
But Vehicle users were greedy, selfish, and plain stupid with their roles. What they needed was to have core mechanics fixed.
Now a Militia tank can survive ALL AV up to prototype AV. The Tanks cost less than dropsuit fittings and are able to survive 6 man AV squads, and this is jsut the beginning of it... we are only seeing what entry level tanks can do, wait until the good stuff arrives on the field... |
crazy space 1
GunFall Mobilization
Covert Intervention
2059
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 10:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Remember they lowered the based stats of tanks to make them weak unless you fit a tank. modules would get buffed.
Oh wait no they said that in the dev blog and then in the same dev blog showed numbers that did the opposite of what they said they were going to do.
|
Asirius Medaius
752
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 10:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
bear90211 wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:Add at least a zero maybe two to the cost of any thing vehicle related, because at the moment they are way too good for way too cheap. Ok so you want to SUPAH NURF HAMMAH us AGAIN for the 7th TIME! and now you want us to be a 2 hit kill to an STD swarm launcher and us to cost 900000 ISK just for the base, so a proto tank will cost... 5.2 million ISk. THINK ABOUT IT. ITS A TANK.
5.2 million for a tank that almost never dies (ever in 1.7) sounds about right; I can't stress enough that I haven't seen or heard anyone destroy a tank with AV.
I think I'm going to take a very long break from this game; CCP claimed they had all of this under control, and took extra months to do so from pushing **** back.
Now this game has ridiculous random changes (HAV speed anyone? Rail Rifle owning everything in sight?). If this is what they pushed back for months in order to finish, and they still screw up, what is to make me think this game will even get better in a year?
Signature coming soonGäó.
[Level 9 Forum Warrior]
|
Ld Collins
The Phalanx Inc
87
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 10:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
8213 wrote:Vehicles need to go back to pre 1.7.
The whole point of a vehicle was that it was expensive but super effective. They weren't used willy-nilly.
But Vehicle users were greedy, selfish, and plain stupid with their roles. What they needed was to have core mechanics fixed.
Now a Militia tank can survive ALL AV up to prototype AV. The Tanks cost less than dropsuit fittings and are able to survive 6 man AV squads, and this is jsut the beginning of it... we are only seeing what entry level tanks can do, wait until the good stuff arrives on the field...
The problem is that Somas and Sicas have the same HP and Shield as Maddy and Gunnlogi and they are cheaper if you lower the shield and armor aon Soma and SIcas you will so a dramatic drop in the number of tanks in a match. |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
1947
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 10:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
A fully fit soma costs around 65k ISK and still wrecks havok among infantry.
I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
|
Jack McReady
DUST University
Ivy League
842
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
currently tanks cost alot less, even less than proto suits, are twice as durable as before and super fast (even without the bugged nitro module). having 20k+ ehp and super speed obviously were not enough, right? CCP also had to nerf AV additionally too ...
let me repeat this, a proto suit dies in 0.5 seconds to a rifle and costs as much as a 20k ehp tank on speed. those changes were obviously never tested  |
|
|
Ld Collins
The Phalanx Inc
88
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:A fully fit soma costs around 65k ISK and still wrecks havok among infantry.
well yes they wreak havoc on infantry because they are suppose to but if you work together you can easily destroy them. Proxy mines RE's FG's Av nades swarms there are alot of AV weapons and equipment in the game. No one seems to be using them effectively also the best advice i could give infantry is to keep installations alive at all costs. A railgun installation can destroy HAVs without breaking a sweat. |
Chibi Andy
Forsaken Immortals
Top Men.
769
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
my suit is more expensive than your tank.
YOU HAVE BEEN SCANNED!!!
sç+a¦át¢èa¦á)sç+
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
4447
Resolution XIII
935
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
bear90211 wrote:Vitharr Foebane wrote:Add at least a zero maybe two to the cost of any thing vehicle related, because at the moment they are way too good for way too cheap. Ok so you want to SUPAH NURF HAMMAH us AGAIN for the 7th TIME! and now you want us to be a 2 hit kill to an STD swarm launcher and us to cost 900000 ISK just for the base, so a proto tank will cost... 5.2 million ISk. THINK ABOUT IT. ITS A TANK.
No, three.
Troll, For lifeGǪ But maybe a dragon, uh a bigger dragon.
|
LudiKure ninda
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
54
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
Eat Blaster bullets infantry scrubs  ,.. like I was getting raped 5 months before with SL an FG 
wANNA KILL A TANK ??? Get yourself a TANK!!! |
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
1410
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
have a look at these
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN58mesUkkY
2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUUVqD3ks40
3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKtYqWBR7h0
4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIwekfp3p5Q
now look closely at most of the ground based combat.... now combine what you've seen with the changes that ccp has applied to this game round vehicles its almost as if they are trying to tell us something ..........
with almost all the adds they have released showing a heavy vehicle presence and the changes to vehicles i.e. price ect its almost like they want lots of vehicles per battle supporting infantry ..
iv said this before but anyone who waches any add for this game and then comes on here getting but hurt from vehicles is just plain stupid tbh almost every add shows tanks , dropships and lavs running rampant on the fireld with infantry scatterd between. just pointing out some blaring obvious truths here
Its gone from suck .....to blow
level 1 forum warrior
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |