|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
826
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
this thread has been around since closed beta, your idea isn't new nor original. it has been answered 1000s of times conclusively.
NO
why? because tanking is expensive not only isk wise but SP wise as well. why should it take two people to operate a machine that I could literally have all my SP in, if I don't have a gunner I can't play. I'll burn in hell before another blueberry gets in my tank(offence intended blueberry gunners you are like cancer, I could gun better with only my feet).
"AVers should be able to solo tanks but it should take 2 people one person operating the legs and the other the av weapon" "logis don't need a nerf but one person should operate the legs and another should aim and shoot"
no, why? what if I don't have my better half? should I just sit and twiddle my thumbs? OH wait I can't sit I just stare at my couch thinking how comfy it looks. *glares at CCP*
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
826
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 13:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
So, I'm seeing a lot of responses from tankers replying to AV QQ, and it's mostly: It should always take team work to down a tank!
But, let's reverse that. It should also take teamwork to USE a tank.
it makes on sense that an armored vehicle shouldn't have a crew of operators.
If it costs my team 3 AV'ers to push your tanks back - then it should cost the other side at least 2 players to use the tank properly.
unoriginal Idea about separating driving and gunning
QQ, no other vehicles do it why can you (bar ADS)
assault dropships suck so it's okay for them
read the OP!!!!!1!1! i bolded it for you!
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
826
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:knight of 6 wrote:this thread has been around since closed beta, your idea isn't new nor original. it has been answered 1000s of times conclusively.
NO
why? because tanking is expensive not only isk wise but SP wise as well. why should it take two people to operate a machine that I could literally have all my SP in, if I don't have a gunner I can't play. I'll burn in hell before another blueberry gets in my tank(offence intended blueberry gunners you are like cancer, I could gun better with only my feet).
"AVers should be able to solo tanks but it should take 2 people one person operating the legs and the other the av weapon" "logis don't need a nerf but one person should operate the legs and another should aim and shoot"
no, why? what if I don't have my better half? should I just sit and twiddle my thumbs? OH wait I can't sit I just stare at my couch thinking how comfy it looks. *glares at CCP* As expected. Tanking is no longer Expensive. My best AV fit costs twice as much as most tanks on the battlefield. Any they aren't an SP sink either. You don't have to max out even half of the skills to be good against AV. Heck even MLT HAVs with MLT mods can withstand PRO AV try again. AV can't solo a vehicle anymore. Try again. If you have the ability to require an entire squad to destroy, then you should require more than 1 person to operate. "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me" Such is the motto of vehicle pilots. Now proven. I have the ability to take an entire squad to destroy for 30 seconds, better tankers than me have that ability for a minute. stop trying to destroy tanks that are in cycle. could you destroy an armor tank that was in a rep cycle in 1.6? no, you waited for it to fall out of cycle then hit it out of cycle. maybe armor tanks are OP but I wouldn't know, I'm a shield tanker. CCP gave us "waves of opportunity" if you hit us during a "wave of opportunity" prepare to die.
also, if you're dead set on separating drivers and gunners. who needs the turret skills and who needs the driving skills? what happens if you don't get your usual gunner/driver and the replacement doesn't have the same skills?
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
826
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:knight of 6 wrote: also, if you're dead set on separating drivers and gunners. who needs the turret skills and who needs the driving skills? what happens if you don't get your usual gunner/driver and the replacement doesn't have the same skills?
isnt it already the case the the tank weapons benefit from the skills of all people in the vehicle ? so, the partner needs no skill whatsoever as long as the owner of the tank has the skills required? as is currently the case...
next question what is there to prevent the wrong person from entering the vehicle?
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
|
|
|