|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
469
   |
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Long Evity wrote:So, I'm seeing a lot of responses from tankers replying to AV QQ, and it's mostly: It should always take team work to down a tank!
But, let's reverse that. It should also take teamwork to USE a tank.
It makes no sense for 1 player to be powerful enough that the other side needs to dedicate half a squad to deal with. Now, I'm not implying tanks should be solo'd, but the way they're used vs the way they're countered don't match up.
If it costs my team 3 AV'ers to push your tanks back - then it should cost the other side at least 2 players to use the tank properly.
So, my suggestion, is take away tanks ability to drive and shoot. They either pilot - or they shoot.
"If they implement this idea I'm quitting tanks!" Good, gtfo. Quitting tanks because you can't be a god on the field just proves you were only in it to be better then everyone else. Why are LAV and most DS limited to being the pilot or turret driver - but a tank, with more HP and power, doesn't?
"Assault dropships..." Still suck. Ever tried aiming with one? It's not as easy as it is a tank, so it's far more acceptable, not to mention how easy it is to push one off you or others, or just blow them up. 1v1, FG vs Assault DS - the FG still wins.
It makes no sense for one person to be powerful enough that a whole team has to dedicate a squad of tankers to win...
Sagaris lover!!!
|
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
469
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Long Evity wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Long Evity wrote:So, I'm seeing a lot of responses from tankers replying to AV QQ, and it's mostly: It should always take team work to down a tank!
But, let's reverse that. It should also take teamwork to USE a tank.
It makes no sense for 1 player to be powerful enough that the other side needs to dedicate half a squad to deal with. Now, I'm not implying tanks should be solo'd, but the way they're used vs the way they're countered don't match up.
If it costs my team 3 AV'ers to push your tanks back - then it should cost the other side at least 2 players to use the tank properly.
So, my suggestion, is take away tanks ability to drive and shoot. They either pilot - or they shoot.
"If they implement this idea I'm quitting tanks!" Good, gtfo. Quitting tanks because you can't be a god on the field just proves you were only in it to be better then everyone else. Why are LAV and most DS limited to being the pilot or turret driver - but a tank, with more HP and power, doesn't?
"Assault dropships..." Still suck. Ever tried aiming with one? It's not as easy as it is a tank, so it's far more acceptable, not to mention how easy it is to push one off you or others, or just blow them up. 1v1, FG vs Assault DS - the FG still wins.
It makes no sense for one person to be powerful enough that a whole team has to dedicate a squad of tankers to win... wtf are you even talking about? What suit or situation requires 6 tanks to handle?
Sorry, I really have no clue, but what i mean to say was, It makes no sense for one player to take down a whole squad of tankers..
Sagaris lover!!!
|
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
471
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Seigfried Warheit wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Long Evity wrote:Anmol Singh wrote:Long Evity wrote:So, I'm seeing a lot of responses from tankers replying to AV QQ, and it's mostly: It should always take team work to down a tank!
But, let's reverse that. It should also take teamwork to USE a tank.
It makes no sense for 1 player to be powerful enough that the other side needs to dedicate half a squad to deal with. Now, I'm not implying tanks should be solo'd, but the way they're used vs the way they're countered don't match up.
If it costs my team 3 AV'ers to push your tanks back - then it should cost the other side at least 2 players to use the tank properly.
So, my suggestion, is take away tanks ability to drive and shoot. They either pilot - or they shoot.
"If they implement this idea I'm quitting tanks!" Good, gtfo. Quitting tanks because you can't be a god on the field just proves you were only in it to be better then everyone else. Why are LAV and most DS limited to being the pilot or turret driver - but a tank, with more HP and power, doesn't?
"Assault dropships..." Still suck. Ever tried aiming with one? It's not as easy as it is a tank, so it's far more acceptable, not to mention how easy it is to push one off you or others, or just blow them up. 1v1, FG vs Assault DS - the FG still wins.
It makes no sense for one person to be powerful enough that a whole team has to dedicate a squad of tankers to win... wtf are you even talking about? What suit or situation requires 6 tanks to handle? Sorry, I really have no clue, but what i mean to say was, It makes no sense for one player to take down a whole squad of tankers.. That isnt what he is saying..he is saying tanks should work like lavs kinda.. have a driver and a gunner..not drive and gun at the same time
That is the worst idea ever, i payed for the tank, the noob in the turret gets the kills, this is going to turn out like dropships.
Sagaris lover!!!
|
|
|
| |
|